Ultimate behavior of RC beams strengthened in flexure using FRP material

被引:10
|
作者
Bouzid, Haytham [1 ,2 ]
Rabia, Benferhat [2 ,3 ]
Daouadji, Tahar Hassaine [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tissemsilt, Dept Sci & Technol, Tissemsilt, Algeria
[2] Univ Tiaret, Lab Geomatics & Sustainable Dev, Tiaret, Algeria
[3] Univ Tiaret, Dept Civil Engn, Tiaret, Algeria
关键词
RC beams; FRP material; Ultimate behavior; Loads; Deflections; Failure mode; Castem software; Externally bonded (EB); Near-surface mounted (NSM); REINFORCED-CONCRETE BEAMS; NSM CFRP RODS; DUCTILITY; DEFLECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116300
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The present paper investigates the ultimate flexural behavior of strengthened reinforced concrete (RC) beams with Externally Bonded (EB) or Near-Surface Mounted (NSM) Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (FRP) reinforcement. For the purpose of predicting the ultimate loads and deflections of strengthened RC beams, numerical and analytical models were developed. Both models were developed for strengthened RC beams that fail in flexure by FRP rupture. First, an analytical model was developed based on the moment-area theorem and the equilibrium of internal forces. Second, based on the finite element (FE) method, an 3D numerical model was developed using Cast3M software, version 21. The reliability of the numerical model was tested against the analytical and experimental results collected from previous research. The selected RC beams were made with Normal-Strength (NS) and High-Strength Concrete (HSC). The comparison showed that the numerical model has an excellent performance in predicting the load-deflection response until failure. Moreover, the beam damage obtained from the numerical modeling agreed with the experimental results. Finally, a numerical comparative study between EB and NSM systems was conducted. The comparison showed the effectiveness of the NSM system in terms of strength and ductility. Further, the analysis of stress and strain showed that NSM system reduces the stresses and strains in concrete and steel reinforcement and prevents cracks propagation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Low-Velocity Impact Load Testing of RC Beams Strengthened in Flexure with Bonded FRP Sheets
    Kishi, Norimitsu
    Komuro, Masato
    Kawarai, Tomoki
    Mikami, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 24 (05)
  • [42] Theoretical analysis on full torsional behavior of RC beams strengthened with FRP materials
    Shen, Kongjian
    Wan, Shui
    Mo, Y. L.
    Jiang, Zhengwen
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2018, 183 : 347 - 357
  • [43] Effect of FRP U-jackets on the behaviour of RC beams strengthened in flexure with NSM CFRP strips
    Zhang, S. S.
    Ke, Y.
    Smith, S. T.
    Zhu, H. P.
    Wang, Z. L.
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2021, 256
  • [44] Experimental study on flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with FRP/SMA composites
    Xue, Yan-Jie
    Wang, Wen-Wei
    Wu, Zeng-Han
    Hu, Shaowei
    Tian, Jun
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2023, 289
  • [45] Behavior of Insulated Carbon-FRP-Strengthened RC Beams Exposed to Fire
    Sayin, B.
    MECHANICS OF COMPOSITE MATERIALS, 2014, 50 (04) : 477 - 490
  • [46] Modeling of flexural behavior of RC beams strengthened with mechanically fastened FRP strips
    Nardone, Fabio
    Lignola, Gian Piero
    Prota, Andrea
    Manfredi, Gaetano
    Nanni, Antonio
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2011, 93 (08) : 1973 - 1985
  • [47] Behavior of Insulated Carbon-FRP-Strengthened RC Beams Exposed to Fire
    B. Sayin
    Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2014, 50 : 477 - 490
  • [48] Performance of mechanically fastened FRP strengthened concrete beams in flexure
    Martin, Jeremy A.
    Lamanna, Anthony J.
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2008, 12 (03) : 257 - 265
  • [49] Shear capacity of FRP-strengthened RC beams: FRP debonding
    Chen, JF
    Teng, JG
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2003, 17 (01) : 27 - 41
  • [50] Evaluation of bending strength with FRP of RC beams strengthened with FRP sheets
    Pisani, Marco A.
    JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES FOR CONSTRUCTION, 2006, 10 (04) : 313 - 320