A systematic review for netizens' response to the truth manipulation on social media

被引:2
|
作者
Akram, Muhammad [1 ]
Nasar, Asim [2 ]
Arshad-Ayaz, Adeela [1 ]
机构
[1] Concordia Univ, Dept Educ, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia, Azman Hashim Int Business Sch, Johor Baharu, Malaysia
关键词
Truth manipulation; Social media; Cognition; Disinformation; Misinformation; Fake news; Propaganda; FAKE NEWS; ATTITUDES; INFORMATION; COGNITION; IDENTITY; IMPACT; WANT;
D O I
10.34105/j.kmel.2023.15.018
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The manipulated or manufactured truth on social media platforms spreads false information to influence netizens' cognition, often resulting in fabricated social and political narratives. This study systematically reviews the literature on truth manipulation and its impact on the cognition of social media users. The primary focus is on disinformation, misinformation, fake news, and propaganda. The study appraises 162 peer-reviewed publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection database using the systematic review method. The data was put through a bibliometric analysis to unpack the evolutionary nuances of netizens' cognitive response to manufactured truth, informativity, and manipulation on social media. The study highlights emerging trends and issues from truth manipulation on social media. The bibliometric analysis reveals since 2017, there has been an increase in the trend of scholarly work about truth manipulation on social media and its effects on the cognition of netizens. The USA seems to be the most prominent node to contribute to the study of truth manipulation. The content analysis shows multiple aspects causing truth manipulation. This study also seeks ways and methods to prevent and counter truth manipulation on social media. It looks at the possibilities of altering netizens' cognitive abilities by improving their critical social media literacies through fact-checking. The study results show that knowledge gaps persist in truth manipulation on social media and the cognitional aspects in response to fabricated narratives. We emphasize the importance of further investigations in this domain.
引用
收藏
页码:322 / 342
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social media and professional development: a systematic review
    Bruguera, Carles
    Guitert, Montse
    Romeu, Teresa
    RESEARCH IN LEARNING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 27
  • [22] Social media and orthodontics: A commentary on a systematic review
    Reynders R.M.
    Isaia L.
    Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2019, 20 (4) : 123 - 126
  • [23] Social Media in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review
    Sarginson, Dawn
    Wendler, M. Cecilia
    JOURNAL OF NURSING EDUCATION, 2024, 63 (01) : 6 - 9
  • [24] Detection of Bots in Social Media: A Systematic Review
    Orabi, Mariam
    Mouheb, Djedjiga
    Al Aghbari, Zaher
    Kamel, Ibrahim
    INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 57 (04)
  • [25] A Systematic Review of Application of Social Media in Libraries
    Madhusudhan, Margam
    Soni, Shahil
    DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01): : 45 - 49
  • [26] Social media and suicide prevention: a systematic review
    Robinson, Jo
    Cox, Georgina
    Bailey, Eleanor
    Hetrick, Sarah
    Rodrigues, Maria
    Fisher, Steve
    Herrman, Helen
    EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 10 (02) : 103 - 121
  • [27] Role of Social Media in Earthquake: A Systematic Review
    Amiresmaili, Mohammadreza
    Zolala, Farzaneh
    Nekoei-Moghadam, Mahmood
    Salavatian, Siavash
    Chashmyazdan, Mohammadreza
    Soltani, Ahmad
    Savabi, Jaber
    IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 23 (05)
  • [28] Why shop on social media? A systematic review
    Oliveira, Carlos
    Bicharra Garcia, Ana Cristina
    Diirr, Bruna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERNET MARKETING AND ADVERTISING, 2022, 16 (04) : 344 - 368
  • [29] Injecting Truth into Social Media
    German, Federico
    Biller-Andorno, Nikola
    SCIENTIST, 2022, 36 (01): : 16 - 17
  • [30] Social media and the value of truth
    Mackay, Jenn Burleson
    JOURNAL OF MASS MEDIA ETHICS, 2013, 28 (03): : 222 - 223