Influence of interspecific competition on mule deer birthing and rearing site selection

被引:2
|
作者
Sallee, Daniel W. [1 ]
McMillan, Brock R. [1 ]
Hersey, Kent R. [2 ]
Petersen, Steven L. [1 ]
Larsen, Randy T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Plant & Wildlife Sci, 4105 Life Sci Bldg, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Utah Div Wildlife Resources, 1594 W North Temple St,Suite 2110, Salt Lake City, UT 84114 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2023年 / 87卷 / 01期
关键词
Cervus canadensis; competition; elk; mule deer; Odocoileus hemionus; resource selection; random forest; RESOURCE SELECTION; ODOCOILEUS-HEMIONUS; ELK; SURVIVAL; CATTLE; FAWNS; DISTRIBUTIONS; MOVEMENTS; MORTALITY; DOMINANCE;
D O I
10.1002/jwmg.22318
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ungulates often alter behavior and space use in response to interspecific competition. Despite observable changes in behavior caused by competitive interactions, research describing the effects of competition on survival or growth is lacking. We used spatial modeling to determine if habitat use by female mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) was affected by other ungulate species prior to, during, and after parturition. We conducted our study in the Book Cliffs region of eastern Utah, USA, during 2019 and 2020. We used resource selection function (RSF) analysis to model space use of 4 ungulate species that potentially competed with mule deer: bison (Bos bison), cattle, elk (Cervus canadensis), and feral horses. We incorporated RSF models for competing species into a random forest analysis to determine if space use by mule deer was influenced by these other ungulate species. We used survival and growth data from neonate mule deer to directly assess potential negative effects of other ungulates. Habitat use by elk was an important variable in predicting use locations of mule deer during birthing and rearing. The relationship was positive, suggesting interference competition was not occurring. Survival of neonate mule deer increased as the probability of use by elk increased (hazard ratio = 0.185 +/- 0.497 [SE]). Further, probability of use by elk in rearing habitat had no influence on growth of neonate mule deer from birth to 6 months of age, suggesting that exploitative competition was not occurring.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Northern Yellowstone mule deer seasonal movement habitat selection, and survival patterns
    Gogan, Peter J. P.
    Klaver, Robert W.
    Olexa, Edward M.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2019, 79 (03) : 403 - 427
  • [42] OVERWINTER FORAGE SELECTION BY MULE DEER ON SEEDED BIG SAGEBRUSH GRASS RANGE
    AUSTIN, DD
    URNESS, PJ
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1983, 47 (04): : 1203 - 1207
  • [43] FORAGE SELECTION COMPARISONS FOR MULE DEER AND CATTLE UNDER MANAGED PONDEROSA PINE
    CURRIE, PO
    REICHERT, DW
    MALECHEK, JC
    WALLMO, OC
    JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1977, 30 (05): : 352 - 356
  • [44] Mule Deer Habitat Selection Following Vegetation Thinning Treatments in New Mexico
    Sorensen, Grant E.
    Kramer, David W.
    Cain, James W., III
    Taylor, Chase A.
    Gipson, Philip S.
    Wallace, Mark C.
    Cox, Robert D.
    Ballard, Warren B.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2020, 44 (01): : 122 - 129
  • [45] The influence of forest cover on mule deer habitat selection, diet, and nutrition during winter in a deep-snow ecosystem
    Serrouya, Robert
    D'Eon, Robert G.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 256 (03) : 452 - 461
  • [46] Evaluating the influence of energy and residential development on the migratory behavior of mule deer
    Wyckoff, Teal B.
    Sawyer, Hall
    Albeke, Shannon E.
    Garman, Steven L.
    Kauffman, Matthew J.
    ECOSPHERE, 2018, 9 (02):
  • [47] Forage selection by mule deer: does niche breadth increase with population density?
    Nicholson, MC
    Bowyer, RT
    Kie, JG
    JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2006, 269 (01) : 39 - 49
  • [48] Nutritional niche separation between native roe deer and the nonnative fallow deer—a test of interspecific competition
    Heidi Rautiainen
    Ulrika A Bergvall
    Annika M Felton
    Mulualem Tigabu
    Petter Kjellander
    Mammal Research, 2021, 66 : 443 - 455
  • [49] CHARACTERISTICS OF BITTERBRUSH HABITATS THAT INFLUENCE CANOPY COVER AND MULE DEER BROWSING
    GUENTHER, GE
    WAMBOLT, CL
    FRISINA, MR
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1993, 37 (03) : 175 - 181
  • [50] THE FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF THE CENTRAL MUDMINNOW AND YELLOW PERCH - THE INFLUENCE OF FORAGING SITE, INTRASPECIFIC AND INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION
    PASZKOWSKI, CA
    OECOLOGIA, 1985, 66 (02) : 271 - 279