Modeling UAS Flight Procedures for SORA Safety Objectives

被引:2
|
作者
Mathou, Charles [1 ,2 ]
Delmas, Kevin [2 ]
Chaudemar, Jean-Charles [1 ]
de Saqui-Sannes, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toulouse, ISAE SUPAERO, Toulouse, France
[2] Off Natl Etud & Rech Aerosp, Toulouse, France
关键词
AltaRica; MBSA; OSO; SORA; UAS; UAV;
D O I
10.1109/SysCon53073.2023.10130845
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Development of unmanned aerial systems (UAS), made of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and equipment such as a ground station, has increased tremendously in recent years. This has made more pressing the need for new design methodologies that provide a reliable and thorough safety assessment throughout the entire design process. The European specific operations risk assessment (SORA) document provides recommended operational safety objectives (OSO) to achieve. The current paper lays groundwork to comply with OSOs pertaining to UAS flight procedures. Key criteria for modeling such procedures are identified and lead to the choice of the AltaRica DataFlow (ADF) language. The Cecilia Workshop is used to model three real-life UAS emergency flight procedures. Custom components developed for this model are presented while discussing the process of modeling a formal procedure from an informal text source. A safety analysis is performed on the resulting model by computing minimal cut sets on an undesired procedure outcome. The results are then reviewed, providing feedback to increase the procedures' safety gain.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] UAS Safety Operation - Legal Issues on Reporting UAS Incidents
    Konert, Anna
    Kasprzyk, Piotr
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, 2021, 103 (03)
  • [22] UAS Safety Operation – Legal Issues on Reporting UAS Incidents
    Anna Konert
    Piotr Kasprzyk
    [J]. Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, 2021, 103
  • [23] A generalized algorithm for tuning UAS flight controllers
    Wright, Holly J.
    Strydom, Reuben
    Srinivasan, Mandyam V.
    [J]. 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS (ICUAS), 2018, : 1369 - 1378
  • [24] Integrity Monitoring for UAS Flight Control Software
    Rife, Jason
    Huang, Hu
    Guyer, Sam
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 29TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION (ION GNSS+ 2016), 2016, : 1585 - 1608
  • [25] Supercomputer predictive modeling for ensuring space flight safety
    Betelin, V. B.
    Smirnov, N. N.
    Nikitin, V. F.
    [J]. ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2015, 109 : 269 - 277
  • [26] Modeling flight safety scenarios via Petri nets
    Schneeweiss, WG
    [J]. PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 1543 - 1549
  • [27] Modeling efficiency and safety on an aircraft carrier flight deck
    Cummings, Mary L.
    Li, Songpo
    Han, Hong
    Aguilar, Carlos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEFENSE MODELING AND SIMULATION-APPLICATIONS METHODOLOGY TECHNOLOGY-JDMS, 2023,
  • [28] OUTLINE OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES
    RANGE, MC
    [J]. NEW OUTLOOK FOR THE BLIND, 1969, 63 (06): : 163 - 164
  • [29] Objectives and Procedures in Civic Education
    Tryon, R. M.
    [J]. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 1930, 31 (01): : 70 - 72
  • [30] THE AUDIT OF INVENTORY: OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES
    Zuca, Stefan
    [J]. METALURGIA INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 18 (01): : 188 - 192