Patient and Treatment Characteristics Associated With Receipt of Core Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in VA Mental Health

被引:1
|
作者
Liebmann, Edward P. [1 ,2 ]
Resnick, Sandra G. [2 ,3 ]
Austin, Karen L. [4 ]
Jedele, Jenefer M. [4 ]
机构
[1] VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Dept Psychiat, Sch Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[3] US Dept Vet Affairs, Northeast Program Evaluat Ctr, Off Mental Hlth & Suicide Prevent, Vet Affairs Cent Off, West Haven, CT 06516 USA
[4] VA Serious Mental Illness Treatment Resource & Ev, Ann Arbor, MI 48105 USA
关键词
MEASUREMENT-BASED CARE; IMPLEMENTATION; ENHANCE;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usac218
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective Measurement-based care (MBC) has been implemented in Veterans Affairs since 2016 and is increasingly used in other mental health care organizations. Little quantitative research exists that assesses patient-level barriers and facilitators of MBC. This study examines correlates of receiving patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among veterans receiving both psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy (Both), psychotherapy only (Psychotherapy), and pharmacotherapy only (Pharmacotherapy). Methods Data on PROM administration were obtained for a 12-month period for 1,726,578 veterans who initiated outpatient mental health care during fiscal year 2019. Clinical, treatment, and PROM data were extracted from the electronic health record. Logistic regression was used to model the association between veteran and treatment characteristics and PROM administration. Results Thirty-two percent of veterans in Both, 26.0% in Psychotherapy, and 8.8% in Pharmacotherapy received at least one PROM. The probability of PROM administration was positively associated with the number of treatment encounters during the fiscal year 2019. Major depressive, generalized anxiety, and other depressive disorders were associated with an increased probability of PROM administration. Psychotic disorders, personality disorders, older age, dementia, and electronic health record suicide risk flag were associated with decreased odds of PROM administration across treatment types. Conclusions Rates of PROM administration differ depending on the type of treatment received. The probability of PROM administration is influenced by the frequency of encounters and, to a lesser extent, having a diagnosis congruent with symptoms assessed in the set of PROMs considered. Consistent with hypotheses from the MBC implementation literature, potential indicators of clinical severity and cognitive impairment decrease the likelihood of PROM utilization.
引用
收藏
页码:3613 / 3620
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Scale Linking to Enable Patient-Reported Outcome Performance Measures Assessed with Different Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Katzan, Irene L.
    Fan, Youran
    Griffith, Sandra D.
    Crane, Paul K.
    Thompson, Nicolas R.
    Cella, David
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (08) : 1143 - 1149
  • [22] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Integration Into Electronic Health Records
    Pitzen, Collette
    Larson, Jasmine
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2016, 12 (10) : 867 - +
  • [23] Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in evaluation of treatment for aphasia
    Ross, Katherine B.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2006, 14 (03) : IX - XI
  • [24] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as proof of treatment efficacy
    Kluzek, Stefan
    Dean, Benjamin
    Wartolowska, Karolina A.
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2022, 27 (03) : 153 - 155
  • [25] Patient-reported outcome measures used to improve youth mental health services: a systematic review
    Bajgain, Kalpana Thapa
    Amarbayan, Mungunzul
    Wittevrongel, Krystle
    McCabe, Erin
    Naqvi, Syeda Farwa
    Tang, Karen
    Aghajafari, Fariba
    Zwicker, Jennifer D.
    Santana, Maria
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2023, 7 (01)
  • [26] Patient-reported outcome measures used to improve youth mental health services: a systematic review
    Kalpana Thapa Bajgain
    Mungunzul Amarbayan
    Krystle Wittevrongel
    Erin McCabe
    Syeda Farwa Naqvi
    Karen Tang
    Fariba Aghajafari
    Jennifer D. Zwicker
    Maria Santana
    Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 7
  • [27] Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) versus patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)Is there a difference?
    Jokstad, Asbjorn
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 4 (03): : 61 - 62
  • [28] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Vedadi, Ali
    Khairalla, Roula
    Che, Adrian
    Nagee, Ahsas
    Saqib, Mohammed
    Ayub, Ali
    Wasim, Aghna
    Macanovic, Sara
    Orchanian-Cheff, Ani
    Selzner-Malekkiani, Nazia
    Bartlett, Susan
    Mucsi, Istvan
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (09) : 2435 - 2445
  • [29] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Ali Vedadi
    Roula Khairalla
    Adrian Che
    Ahsas Nagee
    Mohammed Saqib
    Ali Ayub
    Aghna Wasim
    Sara Macanovic
    Ani Orchanian-Cheff
    Nazia Selzner-Malekkiani
    Susan Bartlett
    Istvan Mucsi
    Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2435 - 2445
  • [30] Exploring patient goals as an addendum to patient-reported outcome measures
    Schifferdecker, Karen E.
    Carluzzo, Kathleen L.
    Kaiser, Karen
    Nelson, Eugene C.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2016, 25 : 34 - 34