Atomistic modeling of the mechanical properties: the rise of machine learning interatomic potentials

被引:47
|
作者
Mortazavi, Bohayra [1 ,2 ]
Zhuang, Xiaoying [1 ,3 ]
Rabczuk, Timon [4 ]
Shapeev, Alexander V. [5 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Chair Computat Sci & Simulat Technol, Dept Math & Phys, Appelstr 11, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[2] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Cluster Excellence PhoenixD Photon Opt & Engn Inno, Hannover, Germany
[3] Tongji Univ, Coll Civil Engn, Dept Geotech Engn, 1239 Siping Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Bauhaus Univ Weimar, Inst Struct Mech, Marienstr 15, D-99423 Weimar, Germany
[5] Skolkovo Inst Sci & Technol, Skolkovo Innovat Ctr, Bolshoy Bulvar 30, Moscow 143026, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
DENSITY-FUNCTIONAL THEORY; THERMAL-CONDUCTIVITY; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; GRAPHENE SHEETS; NETWORK; CHEMISTRY; 1ST-PRINCIPLES; STRENGTH; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1039/d3mh00125c
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Since the birth of the concept of machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) in 2007, a growing interest has been developed in the replacement of empirical interatomic potentials (EIPs) with MLIPs, in order to conduct more accurate and reliable molecular dynamics calculations. As an exciting novel progress, in the last couple of years the applications of MLIPs have been extended towards the analysis of mechanical and failure responses, providing novel opportunities not heretofore efficiently achievable, neither by EIPs nor by density functional theory (DFT) calculations. In this minireview, we first briefly discuss the basic concepts of MLIPs and outline popular strategies for developing a MLIP. Next, by considering several examples of recent studies, the robustness of MLIPs in the analysis of the mechanical properties will be highlighted, and their advantages over EIP and DFT methods will be emphasized. MLIPs furthermore offer astonishing capabilities to combine the robustness of the DFT method with continuum mechanics, enabling the first-principles multiscale modeling of mechanical properties of nanostructures at the continuum level. Last but not least, the common challenges of MLIP-based molecular dynamics simulations of mechanical properties are outlined and suggestions for future investigations are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:1956 / 1968
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accelerating the prediction of inorganic surfaces with machine learning interatomic potentials
    Noordhoek, Kyle
    Bartel, Christopher J.
    NANOSCALE, 2024, 16 (13) : 6365 - 6382
  • [42] A practical guide to machine learning interatomic potentials - Status and future
    Jacobs, Ryan
    Morgan, Dane
    Attarian, Siamak
    Meng, Jun
    Shen, Chen
    Wu, Zhenghao
    Xie, Clare Yijia
    Yang, Julia H.
    Artrith, Nongnuch
    Blaiszik, Ben
    Ceder, Gerbrand
    Choudhary, Kamal
    Csanyi, Gabor
    Cubuk, Ekin Dogus
    Deng, Bowen
    Drautz, Ralf
    Fu, Xiang
    Godwin, Jonathan
    Honavar, Vasant
    Isayev, Olexandr
    Johansson, Anders
    Martiniani, Stefano
    Ong, Shyue Ping
    Poltavsky, Igor
    Schmidt, Kj
    Takamoto, So
    Thompson, Aidan P.
    Westermayr, Julia
    Wood, Brandon M.
    Kozinsky, Boris
    CURRENT OPINION IN SOLID STATE & MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2025, 35
  • [43] Lattice dynamics simulation using machine learning interatomic potentials
    Ladygin, V. V.
    Korotaev, P. Yu
    Yanilkin, A., V
    Shapeev, A., V
    COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2020, 172
  • [44] Discrepancies and error evaluation metrics for machine learning interatomic potentials
    Liu, Yunsheng
    He, Xingfeng
    Mo, Yifei
    NPJ COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [45] Discrepancies and error evaluation metrics for machine learning interatomic potentials
    Yunsheng Liu
    Xingfeng He
    Yifei Mo
    npj Computational Materials, 9
  • [46] Applicability of universal machine learning interatomic potentials to the simulation of steels
    Restrepo, Sebastian Echeverri
    Mohandas, Naveen K.
    Sluiter, Marcel H. F.
    Paxton, Anthony T.
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 33 (03)
  • [47] Roadmap for the development of machine learning-based interatomic potentials
    Zhang, Yong-Wei
    Sorkin, Viacheslav
    Aitken, Zachary H.
    Politano, Antonio
    Behler, Joerg
    Thompson, Aidan
    Ko, Tsz Wai
    Ong, Shyue Ping
    Chalykh, Olga
    Korogod, Dmitry
    Podryabinkin, Evgeny
    Shapeev, Alexander
    Li, Ju
    Mishin, Yuri
    Pei, Zongrui
    Liu, Xianglin
    Kim, Jaesun
    Park, Yutack
    Hwang, Seungwoo
    Han, Seungwu
    Sheriff, Killian
    Cao, Yifan
    Freitas, Rodrigo
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2025, 33 (02)
  • [48] Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials and Long-Range Physics
    Anstine, Dylan M.
    Isayev, Olexandr
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2023, 127 (11): : 2417 - 2431
  • [49] Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials: Surveying Solid Electrolytes
    Hajibabaei, Amir
    Kim, Kwang S.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS, 2021, 12 (33): : 8115 - 8120
  • [50] Validation workflow for machine learning interatomic potentials for complex ceramics
    Ghaffari, Kimia
    Bavdekar, Salil
    Spearot, Douglas E.
    Subhash, Ghatu
    COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2024, 239