Tibial quantitative ultrasound compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in preterm infants

被引:3
|
作者
Tarrell, Ariel [1 ]
Grinsell, Matthew [2 ]
Murray, Mary [3 ]
Lewis, Kimberlee Weaver [4 ]
Yoder, Bradley A. [1 ]
Jenkins, Sabrina Malone [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Nephrol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Div Endocrinol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Intermt Healthcare, Women & Newborn Clin Program, Murray, UT USA
关键词
BONE STATUS; TERM; CURVES; HEALTH; BORN;
D O I
10.1038/s41372-022-01588-y
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The gold standard for diagnosing metabolic bone disease in pediatrics is dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Bone quantitative ultrasound (QUS) has increasing applications. This study compared the relationship of DXA to QUS in preterm infants. DESIGN: Prospective observational study of preterm infants <= 32 weeks gestation or <= 1800 grams at birth. DXA scans measuring bone mineral content (BMC) and tibial QUS scans measuring bone speed of sound (SOS) were obtained near term gestation. RESULTS: 41 infants had bone scans at mean corrected gestation 37.7 +/- 2.1 weeks. BMC and SOS showed weak inverse correlation (R2 0.163, p < 0.01). BMC and SOS correlated with parameters at corrected gestational age at the time of the bone scans (p < 0.05-0.001). SOS correlated with birth gestational age (p < 0.001), not BMC. CONCLUSIONS: A statistically significant weak inverse correlation between DXA and QUS was observed. QUS may have advantages over DXA.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 646
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Comparison of Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus With Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry in Hospitalized Orthopaedic Trauma Patients
    Collinge, Cory A.
    Lebus, George
    Gardner, Michael J.
    Gehrig, Laura
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2010, 24 (03) : 176 - 180
  • [42] Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus - An in vivo comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging
    Louis, O
    Allein, S
    Luypaert, R
    Osteaux, M
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2000, 3 (01) : 43 - 48
  • [43] Agreement Between Skinfold, Ultrasound And Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry In Adults
    Salvador, Igor C.
    Bittencourt, Victor Z.
    Ferreira, Tathiany J.
    Pessanha, Carolina R.
    Costa, Gabriel G.
    Assumpcao, Ana Clara R.
    Sacom, Joao Pedro B.
    Pereira, Thalita R. F.
    Capistrano, Valden L. M., Jr.
    Souza, Marcio L. R.
    Loureiro, Luiz L.
    Pierucci, Anna Paola T. R.
    MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE, 2022, 54 (09) : 464 - 465
  • [44] OSTEOPENIA IN PRETERM INFANTS MEASURED BY DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY (DEXA) AT THE FOREARM - PRELIMINARY-RESULTS
    ALONSO, GC
    RAMOS, A
    SERRANO, M
    GONZALEZ, MA
    HUERGA, MJD
    CANNATA, JB
    CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 54 (05) : 443 - 443
  • [45] MEASUREMENT OF THE CALCANEUS BY ULTRASOUND AND DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY IN POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS
    NAYLOR, KE
    LANGTON, CM
    SMITH, TWD
    EASTELL, R
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1993, 8 : S353 - S353
  • [46] QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF CALLUS DISTRACTION WITH DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY (DEXA)
    SABO, D
    REITER, A
    THOMSEN, M
    PFEIL, J
    COTTA, H
    UNFALLCHIRURG, 1995, 98 (11): : 559 - 565
  • [47] Comparison of bone mineral density with dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, quantitative ultrasound and single energy x-ray absorptiometry
    El-Desouki, MI
    Sherafzal, MS
    Othman, SA
    SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (09) : 1346 - 1350
  • [48] SIMULATION STUDIES OF DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
    SORENSON, JA
    DUKE, PR
    SMITH, SW
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (01) : 75 - 80
  • [49] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in early life
    Lapillonne, A
    Braillon, PM
    Delmas, PD
    Salle, BL
    HORMONE RESEARCH, 1997, 48 : 43 - 49
  • [50] Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan: Guidelines
    Haymann, Jean-Philippe
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2010, 20 (04): : F119 - F122