共 50 条
Content analysis and sentiment analysis of pro- and anti-vaccine conversations on YouTube in India: intentions and causes
被引:0
|作者:
Kumar, Vinit
[1
]
Ji, Gopal
[2
,3
]
Deori, Maya
[4
]
Verma, Manoj Kumar
[4
]
机构:
[1] Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Indian Stat Inst, Documentat Res & Training Ctr, Bengaluru, India
[3] Univ Calcutta, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Kolkata, India
[4] Mizoram Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Aizawl, India
关键词:
COVID-19;
vaccination;
Vaccine hesitancy;
Sentiment analysis;
Hesitancy determinants;
YouTube videos;
Social media health information;
Health communication;
India;
HESITANCY;
COVID-19;
D O I:
10.1108/GKMC-07-2023-0244
中图分类号:
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业];
G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号:
1205 ;
120501 ;
摘要:
PurposeVaccine hesitancy is a long-standing issue among both the general population and health communicators. This study aims to ascertain the inclination and the reasons for vaccine hesitancy by conducting content analysis and sentiment analysis of the perspectives expressed in comments on videos related to vaccine hesitancy uploaded from India on YouTube.Design/methodology/approachThe assessment of the sentiments of the vaccine-hesitant population is done using Valence Aware Dictionary and sEntiment Reasoner sentiment analysis module implemented with Python's NLTK library to automatically determine the sentiments of the comments. Manual content analysis was performed on 60.09% viewer comments randomly selected from the total comments in 238 videos on vaccine hesitancy originated from India and labelled each comment with labels "Anti", "Pro", "Confused", "Not Applicable" and "Unrelated" labels.FindingsThe study found "Mistrust-Government policies", "Fear-health related consequences", "Mistrust-Scientific research", "Vaccine effectiveness and efficacy" and "Misinformation/myths" as the top five determinants for vaccine hesitancy, whereas "Religious beliefs", "Fear-Economic consequences", "Side Effects- short-term" and "Fear-mode of administration" found to be the lesser cited reasons for vaccine hesitancy. However, the study also investigates changes in the inclination of Indian commenters towards vaccine hesitancy and revolving issues over time.Social implicationsPublic health policymakers and health communicators may find the study useful in determining vaccine hesitancy factors in India.Originality/valueThe originality of this study lies in its approach. To date, no sentiment analysis has been conducted on the content released on YouTube by Indian content creators regarding pro- and anti-vaccination videos. This inquiry seeks to fill this research gap.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文