Multi-criteria analysis applied to ranking rehabilitation strategies of water distribution networks

被引:1
|
作者
Brentan, Bruno [1 ,5 ]
Carpitella, Silvia [2 ]
Zanfei, Ariele [3 ]
Gabriel Souza, Rui [1 ]
Menapace, Andrea [3 ]
Meirelles, Gustavo [1 ]
Righetti, Maurizio [3 ]
Izquierdo, Joaquin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Hydraul Engn & Water Resources Dept Sch Engn, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
[2] Calif State Univ Northridge, Dept Mfg Syst Engn & Management, Northridge, CA USA
[3] Free Univ Bozen Bolzano, Fac Engn, Bolzano, Italy
[4] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Multidisciplinary Math, Valencia, Spain
[5] Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Hydraul Engn & Water Resources Dept Sch Engn, Av Presidente Antonio Carlos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
关键词
multi-criteria analysis; rehabilitation; TOPSIS; water distribution systems; MANAGEMENT; SUPPLIERS;
D O I
10.1002/mma.9704
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Rehabilitation of water distribution systems is a complex task that water companies have to tackle continually to keep high-quality service. The larger and more complex the network, the harder to make decisions about the network maintenance strategy to be implemented. Considering pipe replacement as a strategy for water network rehabilitation, this work presents a combination of water distribution system analysis and multi-criteria analysis to rank alternatives for pipe replacement. A set of eight performance criteria is used to evaluate the rehabilitation alternatives. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) is herein adopted to rank the solutions, coupled with a final sensitivity analysis on criteria weights. The obtained results point out as pipe replacement is an essential strategy for rehabilitation since the eight evaluation criteria are improved. The sensitivity analysis shows the best solutions' robustness, with just a few variations in their position in the ranking. The most frequent best solution is then hydraulically evaluated, showing the real benefits of pipe replacement in terms of pressure deficit reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Multi-Criteria Experimental Ranking of Distributed SPARQL Evaluators
    Graux, Damien
    Jachiet, Louis
    Geneves, Pierre
    Layaida, Nabil
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2018, : 693 - 702
  • [32] Multi-criteria ranking of chemicals for toxicological impact assessments
    Gregoris, Elena
    Roman, Marco
    Gambaro, Andrea
    Barbante, Carlo
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2018, 73 : 122 - 127
  • [33] A new multi-criteria model for ranking chess players
    Kaczynska, Aleksandra
    Kolodziejczyk, Joanna
    Salabun, Wojciech
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS (KSE 2021), 2021, 192 : 4290 - 4299
  • [34] A multi-criteria approach for ranking Italian high schools
    Mancini P.
    Marcarelli G.
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2023, 57 (6) : 5533 - 5549
  • [35] Ranking of office lease options by multi-criteria methods
    Ginevičius, Romualdas
    Ginevičius, Tomas
    Gedvilaite, Dainora
    Stasiukynas, Andrius
    [J]. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 2016, 8 (04) : 86 - 93
  • [36] Multi-criteria contingency ranking method for voltage stability
    Dester, Mauricio
    Castro, Carlos A.
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 79 (01) : 220 - 225
  • [37] Sensitivity of Multi-Criteria Analysis Methods in Rural Land Consolidation Project Ranking
    Marinkovic, Goran
    Ilic, Zoran
    Nestorovic, Zarko
    Bozic, Marko
    Bulatovic, Vladimir
    [J]. LAND, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [38] The New Zealand drug harms ranking study: A multi-criteria decision analysis
    Crossin, Rose
    Cleland, Lana
    Wilkins, Chris
    Rychert, Marta
    Adamson, Simon
    Potiki, Tuari
    Pomerleau, Adam C.
    MacDonald, Blair
    Faletanoai, Dwaine
    Hutton, Fiona
    Noller, Geoff
    Lambie, Ian
    Sheridan, Jane L.
    George, Jason
    Mercier, Kali
    Maynard, Kristen
    Leonard, Louise
    Walsh, Patricia
    Ponton, Rhys
    Bagshaw, Sue
    Muthukumaraswamy, Suresh
    McIntosh, Tracey
    Poot, Edward
    Gordon, Paul
    Sharry, Patrick
    Nutt, David
    Boden, Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 37 (09) : 891 - 903
  • [39] A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance identification and ranking of network components
    Almoghathawi, Yasser
    Barker, Kash
    Rocco, Claudio M.
    Nicholson, Charles D.
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2017, 158 : 142 - 151
  • [40] Trust Blog Ranking Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis AHP and TOPSIS
    Zulkefli, Nurul Akhmal Binti Mohd
    Bin Baharudin, Baharum
    Said, Abas Bin Md
    [J]. IT CONVERGENCE AND SECURITY 2017, VOL 2, 2018, 450 : 68 - 76