The role of economic freedom in achieving the environmental sustainability for the highest economic freedom countries: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis

被引:1
|
作者
Bektur, Cisem [1 ]
机构
[1] Sakarya Univ, Fac Polit Sci, Dept Econometr, Esentepe Campus, Serdivan, Sakarya, Turkiye
关键词
Economic freedom; EKC hypothesis; Ecological footprint; Economic growth; Renewable energy; Environmental pollution; CO2; EMISSIONS; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; STATIONARITY TEST; RENEWABLE ENERGY; GROWTH; DEMOCRACY; NATIONS; CANADA;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-29120-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the study, the relationship between ecological footprint, economic freedom, renewable energy consumption, and economic growth is analysed under the scope of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. Here, fifteen countries with the highest economic freedom for the period 1996-2018 are selected to more clearly underline the impact of economic freedom on the environment and examined, i.e., Australia, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Sweden, and Switzerland. The long-term relationship between the variables is examined using the panel cointegration test. According to the test results, it has been observed that the variables in the EKC model act together in the long run. According to the long-term estimation results, it is seen that economic freedom decreases the ecological footprint, namely, environmental degradation, in Canada, while it increases in Estonia. Furthermore, it is concluded that renewable energy reduces the ecological footprint in Australia, Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway, Singapore, and Switzerland. Nevertheless, it has been determined that the EKC hypothesis is valid for Canada, Denmark, and Singapore, but not for other countries.
引用
收藏
页码:67187 / 67196
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Functional sensitivity of testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis
    Wang, Yi-Chia
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 35 (04) : 451 - 466
  • [32] TESTING ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE IN EUROPEAN UNION COUNTRIES
    Wawrzyniak, Dorota
    EKONOMISTA, 2018, (03): : 318 - 334
  • [33] Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of energy consumption and democratic accountability
    Gungor, Hasan
    Olanipekun, Ifedolapo Olabisi
    Usman, Ojonugwa
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (02) : 1464 - 1478
  • [34] Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of energy consumption and democratic accountability
    Hasan Güngör
    Ifedolapo Olabisi Olanipekun
    Ojonugwa Usman
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 1464 - 1478
  • [35] The role of greenfield investment and investment freedom on environmental quality: testing the EKC hypothesis for EU countries
    Aydin, Mehmet
    Degirmenci, Tunahan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (06): : 684 - 694
  • [36] Revisiting the environmental rewards of economic freedom
    Hartwell, Christopher Andrew
    Coursey, Don L.
    ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS LETTERS, 2015, 4 (01): : 36 - 50
  • [37] ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE HYPOTHESIS IN BRICTS: THE ROLE OF TOURISM
    Bozkurt, Cuma
    Akan, Yusuf
    Okumus, Ilyas
    ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT (ESD), 2016, : 59 - 65
  • [38] Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Africa: A focus on the moderating effect of Sino-African economic cooperation
    Elekeleme, Rodrick Molonga
    Hong, Minjun
    INTERNATIONAL AREA STUDIES REVIEW, 2023, 26 (02) : 144 - 160
  • [39] Dynamic Effect of Oil Resources on Environmental Quality: Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Selected African Countries
    Ouedraogo, Mohamed
    Peng, Daiyan
    Chen, Xi
    Hashmi, Shujahat Haider
    Sall, Mamoudou Ibrahima
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (07)
  • [40] Economic growth and environmental pollution in Myanmar: an analysis of environmental Kuznets curve
    Aung, Thiri Shwesin
    Saboori, Behnaz
    Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (25) : 20487 - 20501