Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Wen, Ningyuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yulong [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Guilin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Sishu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Xianze [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bei [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jiong [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Nansheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Biliary Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Div Biliary Surg,Dept Gen Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prognostic factors; recurrent choledocholithiasis; endoscopic sphincterotomy; endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; choledocholithiasi; PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; SPHINCTEROTOMY; BENIGN; STENTS;
D O I
10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) have a reported recurrence rate of 4%-24% after stone extraction. The most commonly applied stone extraction method is endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all available risk factors for recurrent CBDS following stone retraction. Research design and methods: A literature search of studies with case-control design was performed to identify potential risk factors for recurrent CBDS. The impact of different risk factors on stone recurrence was analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Identified risk factors were graded as 'strong,' 'moderate,' or 'weak' after quality assessment. Results: A total of 46 studies discussing stone recurrence following ERCP treatment were included. CBD diameter >= 1.5 cm, sharp CBD angulation, multiple ERCP sessions, postoperative pneumobilia, history of CBD incision, and biliary stent placement were identified as strong risk factors; larger CBD diameter, periampullary diverticulum, mechanical lithotripsy, and history of cholecystectomy were identified as moderate. Other weak risk factors were also listed. Conclusions: In this comprehensive study, we identified 14 risk/protective factors for recurrent CBDS following ERCP. Pooled odds ratios were calculated and evaluated the quality of evidence. These findings may shed light on the assessment and management of CBDS.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 947
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Laparoscopic Holmium laser Lithotripsy and Laparoscopic Bile Duct Exploration for Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Liu, Bin
    Fu, Liangyin
    Lu, Tingting
    Zhang, Guangming
    Dong, Xiaohua
    Zhao, Qiqi
    Yu, Miao
    Ma, Haizhong
    Yang, Kehu
    Cai, Hui
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 47 (07) : 1809 - 1820
  • [42] Efficacy of pancreatoscopy for pancreatic duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Syed M Saghir
    Harmeet S Mashiana
    Babu P Mohan
    Banreet S Dhindsa
    Amaninder Dhaliwal
    Saurabh Chandan
    Neil Bhogal
    Ishfaq Bhat
    Shailender Singh
    Douglas G Adler
    [J]. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2020, 26 (34) : 5207 - 5219
  • [43] Efficacy of pancreatoscopy for pancreatic duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Saghir, Syed M.
    Mashiana, Harmeet S.
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Dhindsa, Banreet S.
    Dhaliwal, Amaninder
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Bhogal, Neil
    Bhat, Ishfaq
    Singh, Shailender
    Adler, Douglas G.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 26 (34) : 5207 - 5219
  • [44] Systematic Review on Surgical Management of Difficult Common Bile Duct stones
    Sam, Zi Hao
    Welsh, Silje
    Kong, ChiaYew
    Glen, Paul
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [45] Risk factors for recurrent bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy
    Ando, T
    Tsuyuguchi, T
    Okugawa, T
    Saito, M
    Ishihara, T
    Yamaguchi, T
    Saisho, H
    [J]. GUT, 2003, 52 (01) : 116 - 121
  • [46] Size of recurrent symptomatic common bile duct stones and factors related to recurrence
    Chang, Jae Hyuck
    Kim, Tae Ho
    Kim, Chang Whan
    Lee, In Seok
    Han, Sok Won
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 25 (05): : 518 - 523
  • [47] PROBLEMS OF RETAINED AND RECURRENT COMMON BILE DUCT STONES
    SMITH, SW
    ENGEL, C
    AVERBOOK, B
    LONGMIRE, WP
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1957, 164 (03): : 231 - 236
  • [48] RECURRENT AND RESIDUAL STONES IN THE COMMON BILE-DUCT
    HUGHES, ESR
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1955, 43 (178) : 198 - 204
  • [49] Large balloon dilation versus mechanical lithotripsy for large bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pascua, M.
    Lawenko, R. M.
    Romero, R.
    Lawenko, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 36 : 96 - 96
  • [50] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis
    Jisheng Zhu
    Guoyong Li
    Peng Du
    Xin Zhou
    Weidong Xiao
    Yong Li
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2021, 35 : 997 - 1005