Risk factors for recurrent common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Wen, Ningyuan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yaoqun [1 ,2 ]
Cai, Yulong [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Guilin [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Sishu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Shaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Xiong, Xianze [1 ,2 ]
Li, Bei [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Jiong [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Nansheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Div Biliary Surg, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Res Ctr Biliary Dis, Div Biliary Surg,Dept Gen Surg, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
prognostic factors; recurrent choledocholithiasis; endoscopic sphincterotomy; endoscopic papillary balloon dilation; choledocholithiasi; PAPILLARY BALLOON DILATION; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; FOLLOW-UP; CHOLEDOCHOLITHIASIS; SPHINCTEROTOMY; BENIGN; STENTS;
D O I
10.1080/17474124.2023.2242784
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Common bile duct stones (CBDS) have a reported recurrence rate of 4%-24% after stone extraction. The most commonly applied stone extraction method is endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify all available risk factors for recurrent CBDS following stone retraction. Research design and methods: A literature search of studies with case-control design was performed to identify potential risk factors for recurrent CBDS. The impact of different risk factors on stone recurrence was analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs and heterogeneity were calculated. Identified risk factors were graded as 'strong,' 'moderate,' or 'weak' after quality assessment. Results: A total of 46 studies discussing stone recurrence following ERCP treatment were included. CBD diameter >= 1.5 cm, sharp CBD angulation, multiple ERCP sessions, postoperative pneumobilia, history of CBD incision, and biliary stent placement were identified as strong risk factors; larger CBD diameter, periampullary diverticulum, mechanical lithotripsy, and history of cholecystectomy were identified as moderate. Other weak risk factors were also listed. Conclusions: In this comprehensive study, we identified 14 risk/protective factors for recurrent CBDS following ERCP. Pooled odds ratios were calculated and evaluated the quality of evidence. These findings may shed light on the assessment and management of CBDS.
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 947
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic surgery versus Endoscopy in the management Common Bile Duct Stones: systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Elhag, Hafs
    Eltayeb, Omar
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [2] The Rendezvous Technique for Common Bile Duct Stones: A Meta-Analysis
    Huang, Long
    Yu, Qing-sheng
    Zhang, Qi
    Liu, Ju-da
    Wang, Zhen
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2015, 25 (06): : 462 - 470
  • [3] Common bile duct stones management: A network meta-analysis
    Mohseni, Shahin
    Bass, Gary Alan
    Forssten, Maximilian Peter
    Martinez Casas, Isidro
    Martin, Matthew
    Davis, Kimberly A.
    Haut, Elliott R.
    Sugrue, Michael
    Kurihara, Hayato
    Sarani, Babak
    Cao, Yang
    Coimbra, Raul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2022, 93 (05): : E155 - E165
  • [4] Complications of common bile duct stones: A risk factors analysis
    Oh, Dong Jun
    Nam, Ji Hyung
    Jang, Dong Kee
    Lee, Jun Kyu
    [J]. HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 20 (04) : 361 - 365
  • [5] Complications of common bile duct stones: A risk factors analysis
    Dong Jun Oh
    Ji Hyung Nam
    Dong Kee Jang
    Jun Kyu Lee
    [J]. Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2021, 20 (04) : 361 - 365
  • [6] 38 Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Endoscopy in the Management Common Bile Duct Stones: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Elhag, H. E.
    Eltayab, O.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (SUPPL 6)
  • [7] Incidence and predictors of common bile duct stones in patients with acute cholecystitis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Hongyi
    Jorissen, Robert
    Walcott, James
    Nikfarjam, Mehrdad
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 90 (09) : 1598 - 1603
  • [8] Risk factors for post-retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in patients with common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis
    Zhou, Bo
    Zhao, Liyuan
    Xing, Xinfeng
    Wang, Hai
    Kuwantai, Asihati
    Chen, Kai
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [9] Endoscopic Treatment of Large Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Gkolfakis, Paraskevas
    Ramai, Daryl
    Tziatzios, Georgios
    Lester, Janice
    Crino, Stefano Francesco
    Frazzoni, Leonardo
    Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
    Arvanitakis, Marianna
    Blero, Daniel
    Lemmers, Arnaud
    Eisendrath, Pierre
    Fuccio, Lorenzo
    Triantafyllou, Konstantinos
    Gabbrielli, Armando
    Deviere, Jacques
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 21 (01) : 33 - +
  • [10] Preventive Saline Irrigation of the Bile Duct to Reduce the Rate of Residual Common Bile Duct Stones Without Intraductal Ultrasonography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Akbar, Usman A.
    Vorla, Mounica
    Chaudhary, Ahmed Jamal
    Fatima, Maurish
    Vikash, Fnu
    Taj, Sobaan
    Qazi, Shaheryar
    Khan, Zubair
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)