Treatment Planning of Bulky Tumors Using Pencil Beam Scanning Proton GRID Therapy

被引:1
|
作者
Halthore, Aditya [1 ,2 ]
Fellows, Zachary [2 ]
Tran, Anh [2 ]
Deville, Curtiland, Jr. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Jean L. [1 ,2 ]
Meyer, Jeffrey [1 ]
Li, Heng [1 ,2 ]
Sheikh, Khadija [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol & Mol Sci, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Proton Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
proton; spatial fractionation; GRID; bulky tumors; RADIATION-THERAPY;
D O I
10.14338/IJPT-22-00028
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare spatially fractionated radiation therapy (GRID) treatment planning techniques using proton pencil-beam-scanning (PBS) and photon therapy. Materials and Methods: PBS and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) GRID plans were retrospectively generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. GRID targets were arranged along the long axis of the gross tumor, spaced 2 and 3 cm apart, and treated with a prescription of 18 Gy. PBS plans used 2- to 3-beam multiple-field optimization with robustness evaluation. Dosimetric parameters including peak-to-edge ratio (PEDR), ratio of dose to 90% of the valley to dose to 10% of the peak VPDR(D90/D10), and volume of normal tissue receiving at least 5 Gy (V5) and 10 Gy (V10) were calculated. The peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), VPDR(D90/D10), and organ-at-risk doses were prospectively assessed in 2 patients undergoing PBS-GRID with pretreatment quality assurance computed tomography (QACT) scans. Results: PBS and VMAT GRID plans were generated for 5 patients with bulky tumors. Gross tumor volume values ranged from 826 to 1468 cm3. Peak-to-edge ratio for PBS was higher than for VMAT for both spacing scenarios (2-cm spacing, P =.02; 3-cm spacing, P =.01). VPDR(D90/D10) for PBS was higher than for VMAT (2-cm spacing, P =.004; 3-cm spacing, P =.002). Normal tissue V5 was lower for PBS than for VMAT (2cm spacing, P =.03; 3-cm spacing, P =.02). Normal tissue mean dose was lower with PBS than with VMAT (2-cm spacing, P =.03; 3-cm spacing, P =.02). Two patients treated using PBS GRID and assessed with pretreatment QACT scans demonstrated robust PVDR, VPDR(D90/D10), and organs-at-risk doses. Conclusions: The PEDR was significantly higher for PBS than VMAT plans, indicating lower target edge dose. Normal tissue mean dose was significantly lower with PBS than VMAT. PBS GRID may result in lower normal tissue dose compared with VMAT plans, allowing for further dose escalation in patients with bulky disease.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:40 / 49
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adaptive re-planning with image guided pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy
    Chilukuri, S.
    Gaikwad, U.
    Nangia, S.
    Patro, K.
    Thiagarajan, R.
    Mp, N.
    Sunder, S.
    Burela, N.
    Thimma, R.
    Panda, P.
    Jalali, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1197 - S1198
  • [22] An adaptive spot placement method on Cartesian grid for pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Lin, Bowen
    Fu, Shujun
    Lin, Yuting
    Rotondo, Ronny L.
    Huang, Weizhang
    Li, Harold H.
    Chen, Ronald C.
    Gao, Hao
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (23):
  • [23] Endoscopic Resection Followed by Proton Therapy With Pencil Beam Scanning for Skull Base Tumors
    Leeman, Jonathan E.
    Lee, Nancy Y.
    Zhou, Ying
    Neal, Brian
    Sine, Kevin
    Tabar, Viviane
    Cohen, Marc A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2019, 129 (06): : 1313 - 1317
  • [24] Feasibility of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy SBRT Locally Advanced Lung Tumors
    Lin, L.
    Burgdorf, B.
    Zhai, H.
    Hard, B.
    Huang, S.
    Berman, A.
    Feigenberg, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (06) : E489 - E489
  • [25] Dosimetric comparison of VMAT and pencil beam scanning proton therapy for abdominal pediatric tumors
    Guerreiro, F.
    Seravalli, E.
    Janssens, G. O.
    Maduro, J. H.
    Brouwer, C. L.
    Korevaar, E. W.
    Knopf, A. C.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S885 - S886
  • [26] Effects of spot size errors in DynamicARC pencil beam scanning proton therapy planning
    Rana, Suresh
    Rosenfeld, Anatoly B
    Physics in Medicine and Biology, 2024, 69 (23):
  • [27] Motion Management for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy
    Lin, Liyong
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3821 - 3821
  • [28] Pencil Beam Scanning:: a dynamical approach to proton therapy
    Sepulchre, R
    Gérard, M
    Marchand, B
    Prieels, D
    Bauvir, B
    IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON BIO-INFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 370 - 375
  • [29] Robust Evaluation of Treatment Planning Techniques in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Cranio-Spinal Irradiation
    Rana, S.
    Romaguera, T.
    Gutierrez, A.
    Bennouna, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2866 - 2867
  • [30] Pencil-beam scanning proton therapy for the treatment of glomus jugulare tumours
    Kubes, Jiri
    Vondracek, Vladimir
    Andrlik, Michal
    Navratil, Matej
    Slavikova, Silvia
    Klika, Daniel
    Haas, Alexandra
    Dedeckova, Katerina
    Kopeckova, Katerina
    Ondrova, Barbora
    Rotnaglova, Eliska
    Vinakurau, Stepan
    Grebenyuk, Alexander
    Rosina, Jozef
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RADIATION SCIENCES, 2022, 69 (04) : 456 - 462