Synthetic Osmotic Dilators for Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening - an Evidence-Based Review

被引:3
|
作者
Rath, Werner [1 ]
Kummer, Julia [2 ,3 ]
Koenigbauer, Josefine T. [4 ]
Hellmeyer, Lars [2 ,3 ]
Stelzl, Patrick [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Med Fak, Gynakol & Geburtshilfe, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
[2] Vivantes Klinikum Friedrichshain, Klin Geburtsmed, Berlin, Germany
[3] Vivantes Klinikum Friedrichshain, Klin Gynakol, Berlin, Germany
[4] Charite, Klin Geburtsmed, Campus Charite Mitte, Berlin, Germany
[5] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Univ klin Gynakol Geburtshilfe & Gynakol Endokrin, Kepler Univ klinikum, Linz, Austria
[6] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Univ klin Gynakol Geburtshilfe & Gynakol Endokrin, Kepler Univ klinikum, Altenberger Str 69, A-4040 Linz, Austria
关键词
synthetic osmotic dilator (Dilapan-S); pre-induction cervical ripening; efficacy; safety; balloon catheter; prostaglandins; BALLOON CATHETERS; LABOR INDUCTION; DILAPAN-S; MISOPROSTOL; TERM;
D O I
10.1055/a-2103-8329
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Mechanical methods have gained growing interest for pre-induction cervical ripening in women with an unripe cervix, since they have a better safety profile compared to prostaglandins. Balloon catheters have been the gold standard method for decades, while there was a lack of data on synthetic osmotic cervical dilators. Not until 2015, when Dilapan-S was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for induction of labor, numerous studies have been published on the use of Dilapan-S in this field. The rate of vaginal deliveries associated with the use of Dilapan-S ranges from 61.6 to 81.7%, and no serious complications needing further interventions have been reported to this date. Dilapan-S was shown to be as effective as the Foley balloon catheter as well as the 10 mg PGE(2) vaginal insert and orally applied misoprostol (25 mu g every 2 hours) in achieving vaginal delivery, but patient's satisfaction during the cervical ripening process was significantly higher compared to the other methods and the rate of uterine hyperstimulation was significantly lower compared to prostaglandins (PGs). Minor complications (e.g. vaginal bleeding) associated with the use of Dilapan-S were < 2%, and maternal infectious morbidity was not higher compared to Foley balloon and vaginal PGE(2) or misoprostol. Due to these beneficial properties Dilapan-S might be an ideal option for outpatient cervical ripening, as shown in a recent randomized clinical trial comparing inpatient to outpatient cervical ripening. Furthermore, according to the manufacturers' product information, Dilapan-S is the only cervical ripening method that is not contraindicated for induction of labor in women with a previous cesarean section. Upcoming guidelines should consider synthetic osmotic cervical dilators as an effective and safe method for cervical ripening/induction of labor acknowledging that more evidence-based data are mandatory, particularly in patients with a previous cesarean section.
引用
收藏
页码:1491 / 1499
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Implementation of Evidence-Based Cervical Ripening Protocol: Outcomes and Next Steps
    Zakama, Arthurine
    Sobhani, Nasim C.
    Lamar, Robyn
    Rosenstein, Melissa G.
    AJP REPORTS, 2020, 10 (04): : E408 - E412
  • [42] A randomized controlled trial of pre-induction cervical ripening comparing dilapan-s versus foley balloon (DILAFOL trial)
    Saad, Antonio
    Villareal, Josephine
    Eid, Joe
    Spencer, Nicholas
    Ellis, Viviana
    Hankins, Gary D.
    Saade, George
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S18 - S19
  • [43] Extra Amniotic Balloon for Pre-Induction Cervical Ripening: A Randomized Comparison of Weighted Traction vs. Non-Weighted
    Lutgendorf, Monica A.
    Johnson, Alan M.
    Terpstra, Eric A.
    Snider, Tracie C.
    McKelvey, Samantha A.
    Magann, Everett F.
    REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2011, 18 (03) : 331A - 332A
  • [44] A comparison of oral mifepristone to intravenous oxytogin for pre-induction cervical ripening and labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes beyond 36 weeks' gestation
    Wing, D
    Guberman, C
    Fassett, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : S204 - S204
  • [45] Synthetic osmotic dilators for cervical preparation prior to abortion-An international multicentre observational study
    Chodankar, Rohan
    Gupta, Janesh
    Gdovinova, Daniela
    Bovo, Mary Jane
    Hanacek, Jiri
    Kan, Natalia
    Roizin, John
    Tyutyunnik, Victor
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 228 : 249 - 254
  • [46] Pre-term cervical ripening and labor induction
    Törnblom, SA
    Östlund, E
    Granström, L
    Ekman, G
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2002, 104 (02) : 120 - 123
  • [47] Early vs. delayed amniotomy in individuals undergoing pre-induction cervical ripening with transcervical Foley balloon: a meta-analysis
    Diab, Yara Hage
    Diab, Maya
    Horgan, Rebecca
    Berry, Marissa
    Saad, Antonio
    Slagle, Helen B. Gomez
    Saade, George
    Kawakita, Tetsuya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (08)
  • [48] PRE-INDUCTION RIPENING OF CERVIX WITH EXTRA-AMNIOTIC PROSTAGLANDIN-E2 IN GEL
    THIERY, M
    PAREWYCK, W
    DEGEZELLE, H
    VANKETS, H
    SMIS, B
    VERHEUGEN, C
    GERRIS, J
    VOORHOOF, L
    DEROM, R
    MARTENS, G
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GEBURTSHILFE UND PERINATOLOGIE, 1978, 182 (05): : 352 - 357
  • [49] Predictors of vaginal delivery after cervical ripening using a synthetic osmotic dilator
    Saad, Antonio F.
    Gupta, Janesh
    Hruban, Lukas
    Hankins, Gary D.
    Saade, George R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2020, 246 : 160 - 164
  • [50] Pre-induction cervical ripening using two different dinoprostone vaginal preparations: A randomized clinical trial of tablets and slow release retrievable insert
    Abdelaziz, Ahmed
    Mahmoud, Amani A.
    Ellaithy, Mohamed, I
    Abees, Sara H.
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 57 (04): : 560 - 566