Veganism and animal welfare, scientific, ethical, and philosophical arguments

The justification for this review article is to understand the position of vegans and those individuals who food of animal origin from an unbiased perspective but with a grounding in scientific evidence. This will provide eat meat with scientific and ethical arguments to defend their alimentary autonomy in the context of the moral has emerged in societies regarding the consumption of meat and animal products, which is criticized -sometimes attacked- by activists, ovolactovegetarians, or vegetarians with alimentary habits that stress ethical and moral animals. These individuals refuse to eat meat and animal products but sometimes show disrespect for those recent decades, veganism and vegetarianism have reached an apogee in some western societies where they considered a healthy option for humans that simultaneously fosters animal and environmental welfare. While may provide numerous benefits, they can also entail health risks by failing to provide balance and necessary supplements. Various researchers concur that they are not appropriate for pregnant women, children, or carnivorous omnivorous pets. Our review of scientific articles in favor and against dietary regimens that lack protein of leads to the conclusion that these dietary changes, on their own, do not reduce animal suffering or the contamination generated by the meat, dairy, and poultry industries. Finally, it is important to consider that, despite the popular that vegetarianism and veganism are healthy diet alternatives, the diet must be individualized and well-balanced to each stage of their life cycle.