Structural and cross-cultural validity of the Afrikaans for the Western Cape Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire

被引:4
|
作者
de Klerk, Susan [1 ]
Jerosch-Herold, Christina [2 ]
Buchanan, Helen [3 ]
van Niekerk, Lana [1 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Div Occupat Therapy, Dept Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Cape Town, South Africa
[2] Univ East Anglia, Sch Hlth Sci, Norwich, Norfolk, England
[3] Univ Cape Town, Div Occupat Therapy, Dept Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Fac Hlth Sci, Cape Town, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Internal consistency; Measurement invariance; Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis; South Africa; Upper limb impairment; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; OUTCOME MEASURE; ARABIC VERSION; ADAPTATION; VALIDATION; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1186/s41687-022-00536-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire has been translated and cross-culturally adapted to Afrikaans for the Western Cape, within the public health service context of South Africa. The aim of this study was to evaluate structural validity, internal consistency, and cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance of this new translation to increase applicability and clinical utility in a public health service context. Methods During this cross-sectional study, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted with parallel analysis and oblimin rotation. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multiple group confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) to assess cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance, was employed to test model fit with X-2 goodness-of-fit statistic, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) and comparative fit index (CFI). Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha. Results 109 women and 110 men (n = 219) completed the Afrikaans for the Western Cape and the South African English DASH questionnaire, used during the analysis. Unidimensionality of the Afrikaans for the Western Cape DASH questionnaire was not supported in the 218 questionnaires eligible for inclusion in the analysis [X-2 (df) = 1799.10 (405); p value = < 0.01; RMSEA (90% CI) = 0.126 (0.120-0.132); SRMR = 0.09 and CFI = 0.984]. EFA revealed a two-factor structure with Eigenvalues exceeding one explaining 55% and 7% of the variance. The two-factor structure of the Afrikaans for the Western Cape DASH questionnaire was supported during CFA. Cronbach's alpha revealed good internal consistency of both factors [factor 1 = 0.97 (0.96, 0.97) and factor 2 = 0.92 (0.90, 0.94)]. MGCFA conducted between 218 Afrikaans for the Western Cape DASH and 219 South African English DASH questionnaires (N = 437) revealed that the data supports configural, metric and scalar invariance models during initial model fit assessment. Subsequent hypotheses testing comparing the nested models revealed that scalar invariance holds. Conclusion The Afrikaans for the Western Cape DASH questionnaire revealed a two-factor structure with good internal consistency across the two factors and demonstrated measurement invariance with the South African English DASH questionnaire.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis
    Alison Hammond
    Yeliz Prior
    Sarah Tyson
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 19
  • [42] Linguistic validation, validity and reliability of the British English versions of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and QuickDASH in people with rheumatoid arthritis
    Hammond, Alison
    Prior, Yeliz
    Tyson, Sarah
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
  • [43] The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire in intercollegiate athletes: Validity limited by ceiling effect
    Hsu, Jason E.
    Nacke, Elliot
    Park, Min J.
    Sennett, Brian J.
    Huffman, G. Russell
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2010, 19 (03) : 349 - 354
  • [44] Cross-cultural adaptation process and pilot testing of the Arabic version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-Arabic)
    Alotaibi, Naser Mohammed
    HAND THERAPY, 2010, 15 (04) : 80 - 86
  • [45] Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
    Benjamin Haldorsen
    Ida Svege
    Yngve Roe
    Astrid Bergland
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15
  • [46] Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome
    Haldorsen, Benjamin
    Svege, Ida
    Roe, Yngve
    Bergland, Astrid
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2014, 15
  • [47] Measurement Characteristics and Clinical Utility of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) Among Adults With Arthritis
    Greenspan, Sydney
    Mallinson, Trudy
    -Jones, Linda Ehrlich
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 105 (06): : 1233 - 1234
  • [48] PILOT TESTING OF THE POLISH PRE-FINAL VERSION OF "DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND" (DASH) QUESTIONNAIRE
    Golicki, D.
    Krzysiak, M.
    Strzelczyk, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A598 - A599
  • [49] Examination of the Applicability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire to Patients with Hand Injuries and Diseases Using Rasch Analysis
    Kathrin Braitmayer
    Caroline Dereskewitz
    Cornelia Oberhauser
    Klaus-Dieter Rudolf
    Michaela Coenen
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2017, 10 : 367 - 376
  • [50] Examination of the Applicability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire to Patients with Hand Injuries and Diseases Using Rasch Analysis
    Braitmayer, Kathrin
    Dereskewitz, Caroline
    Oberhauser, Cornelia
    Rudolf, Klaus-Dieter
    Coenen, Michaela
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2017, 10 (03): : 367 - 376