Social mycorrhiza: The social infrastructure of agroecological farming economies

被引:1
|
作者
Leslie, Isaac Sohn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Extens, Brattleboro, VT 05405 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIOLOGY | 2024年 / 10卷 / 01期
关键词
Agrarian question; agroecology; farm viability; political economy; social movements; community and economic development; food justice; FOOD SOVEREIGNTY; FARMERS; AGRICULTURE; VALUES; GLOBALIZATION; EMBEDDEDNESS; STRATEGIES; SEXUALITY; SYSTEMS; ROOTS;
D O I
10.1080/23251042.2023.2267828
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Alternative agriculture (e.g. agroecology and organics) aims to address global environmental and social problems: goals that hinge on alternative farms' economic viability. Viability depends on farmers accessing key resources (e.g. land), typically through markets, but also through social relationships. In this article, I offer a theory of how agroecological farmers' social infrastructure can enable resource access. 'Social mycorrhiza' uses ecological mycorrhiza as a metaphor to conceptualize how individuals with simultaneous market interests and movement-based values (like alternative farmers) create social networks that facilitate resource access, in circumstances where they trust each other will act according to both their economic interests and their social and environmental values, over time. Social mycorrhiza highlights cooptation - when social and environmental values are sacrificed for economic interests - and burnout - when economic viability is sacrificed forsocial and environmental values. I illustrate social mycorrhiza using a case study of alternative (organic and agroecological) farmers in Buenos Aires Province, Argentina. In short, social mycorrhiza describes the social relational infrastructure of agroecological farming economies.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 54
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social foundations of postindustrial economies
    Vanhuysse, P
    GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION, 2001, 36 (01) : 128 - 131
  • [22] Urban farming for social benefit
    Nesheli, S. Akbarnezhad
    Salaj, A. Temeljotov
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2024, 58 (03): : 351 - 356
  • [23] SOCIAL-SCIENCES FOR FARMING
    FEDOSEYEV, PN
    VESTNIK AKADEMII NAUK SSSR, 1979, (03) : 82 - 87
  • [24] THE SOCIAL STUDY OF FAMILY FARMING
    WILLIAMS, WM
    GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 1963, 129 (01): : 63 - 75
  • [25] What are the benefits of social farming?
    Asquith, Robin
    VETERINARY RECORD, 2020, 186 (03) : 99 - 99
  • [26] Social networks and farming resilience
    Bruce, Ann
    Jackson, Cornell
    Lamprinopoulou, Chrysa
    OUTLOOK ON AGRICULTURE, 2021, 50 (02) : 196 - 205
  • [27] The centrality of the social in African farming
    Fairhead, J
    Leach, M
    IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2005, 36 (02): : 86 - +
  • [28] Annotated guide to websites of alternative economies, social economies
    Laura Fano Morrissey
    Development, 2010, 53 (3) : 436 - 440
  • [29] An approach to the social construction of agroecological principles in Latin America
    Nunez-Espinoza, Juan Felipe
    Antonio, Perla Yunuen M. O. R. A. L. E. S.
    Najera, Shamed Mayela Ramirez
    DESENVOLVIMENTO E MEIO AMBIENTE, 2024, 64 : 92 - 116
  • [30] Social-ecological experiments to foster agroecological transition
    Gaba, Sabrina
    Bretagnolle, Vincent
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2020, 2 (02) : 317 - 327