Clinical use of the manchester triage system in patients with dizziness - An observational study in the emergency department

被引:0
|
作者
Kogej, Monika [1 ]
Scherzberg, Julia [2 ]
Schacher, Sylvia [3 ]
Berger, Moritz [4 ]
Seidel, Matthias [5 ]
Graff, Ingo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bonn, Dept Clin Acute & Emergency Med, Venusberg Campus 1, Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Freiburg, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Freiburg, Germany
[3] Helios Hosp Siegburg, Dept Clin Emergency Med, Siegburg, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp Bonn, Inst Med Biometry Informat & Epidemiol, Bonn, Germany
[5] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Cologne, Germany
关键词
Manchester triage system; Emergency medicine; Emergency department; Vertigo; Dizziness; Risk stratification; ACUTE VERTIGO; STROKE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ienj.2023.101403
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction: Dizziness is a common symptom with diverse causes, including ear-nose-throat, internal, neurological, or psychiatric origins. While for most parts treatable in nonemergency settings, it can also signal timecritical conditions, like an unnoticed stroke, requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent lasting harm or death. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the Manchester Triage System in classifying patients presenting with dizziness based on final diagnoses and patient outcomes, as no specific flow chart exists for this symptom in the MTS. Methods: Monocentric, retrospective observational study. To test the validity of the MTS in the triage of dizziness patients, the treatment level was used as a surrogate parameter. We grouped the patients into outpatient, normal ward and intermediate care/intensive care unit (IMC/ICU) patients. Furthermore, we analyzed the dizziness patients in subgroups based on the origin of their dizziness to identify potential improvements for the MTS. Patients with dizziness and stroke, who represent the most vulnerable group of dizziness patients, were also evaluated separately. Results: During the observation period, 2958 patients presented at the ED with the symptom dizziness and 52 017 without, who formed the reference group. When examining the relationship between triage level and subsequent treatment level, a larger deviation is observed compared to the reference group. The receiver operating characteristics (ROC) regarding hospital admission in general showed an area under the curve (AUC) in the subgroup with dizziness due to a central nervous system causes (n=838) of 0.69 (95% CI 0.65 - 0.72) and in the subgroup of dizziness by other organic cause (n=901), an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI 0.60 - 0.68). The reference group had an AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.75 - 0.76) here. In relation to admission to IMC/ICU, the results were similar. The sensitivity of the MTS in terms of an adequate initial assessment of dizziness patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) was 0.39, the specificity was 0.91 (reference group sensitivity 0.72, specificity 0.82). Conclusion: In terms of construct validity, the present study revealed that the use of MTS as a priority triage assessment tool was found to be less accurate in emergency patients with dizziness, particularly those diagnosed with stroke/TIA, when compared to other emergency patients.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Interruptions on Triage Process in Emergency Department A Prospective, Observational Study
    Johnson, Kimberly D.
    Gillespie, Gordon L.
    Vance, Kimberly
    JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2018, 33 (04) : 375 - 381
  • [42] Acute abdominal pain in triage: A retrospective observational study of the Manchester triage system's validity
    Zaboli, Arian
    Ausserhofer, Dietmar
    Pfeifer, Norbert
    Magnarelli, Gabriele
    Ciccariello, Laura
    Siller, Marianne
    Turcato, Gianni
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2021, 30 (7-8) : 942 - 951
  • [43] Improving the prioritization of children at the emergency department: Updating the Manchester Triage System using vital signs
    Zachariasse, Joany M.
    Maconochie, Ian K.
    Nijman, Ruud G.
    Greber-Platzer, Susanne
    Smit, Frank J.
    Nieboer, Daan
    van der Lei, Johan
    Alves, Claudio F.
    Moll, Henriette A.
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (02):
  • [44] Patients' experiences of triage in an emergency department: A phenomenographic study
    Phiri, Moitshepi
    Heyns, Tanya
    Coetzee, Isabel
    APPLIED NURSING RESEARCH, 2020, 54
  • [45] The use of ECG by triage nurses may improve the stratification of patients with cardiological symptoms admitted to the emergency department: a prospective observational study
    Zaboli, A.
    Magnarelli, G.
    Sibilio, S.
    Toccolini, E.
    Marsoner, T.
    De Filippo, C.
    Modolo, F.
    Gritsch, M.
    Mayr, F.
    Scola, G.
    Giudiceandre, A.
    Pfeifer, N.
    Turcato, G.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 3030 - 3030
  • [46] Manchester Triage System: assessment in an emergency hospital service
    de Jesus, Ana Paula Santos
    Okuno, Meiry Fernanda Pinto
    Campanharo, Cassia Regina Vancini
    Lopes, Maria Carolina Barbosa Teixeira
    Batista, Ruth Ester Assayag
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2021, 74 (03)
  • [47] Validity of the Manchester Triage System in paediatric emergency care
    Roukema, J.
    Steyerberg, E. W.
    van Meurs, A.
    Ruige, M.
    van der Lei, J.
    Moll, H. A.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (12) : 906 - 910
  • [48] The Manchester triage system: improvements for paediatric emergency care
    van Veen, Mirjam
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    van't Klooster, Mariet
    Ruige, Madelon
    van Meurs, Alfred H. J.
    van der Lei, Johan
    Moll, Henriette A.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2012, 29 (08) : 654 - 659
  • [49] The clinical Use of the Linz Triage Score (LTS) in the gynecologic Emergency Department
    Wenzl, A.
    Bergmeister, B.
    Hauer, U.
    Hefler, L.
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2023, 83 (06) : 724 - 724
  • [50] Observer agreement of the Manchester Triage System and the Emergency Severity Index: a simulation study
    Storm-Versloot, M. N.
    Ubbink, D. T.
    Choi, V. Chin a
    Luitse, J. S. K.
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (08) : 556 - 560