Assessing Reliability and Validity of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) in a Japanese Clinical Population

被引:0
|
作者
Kato, Masaki [1 ]
Kikuchi, Toshiaki [2 ]
Watanabe, Koichiro [3 ]
Sumiyoshi, Tomiki [4 ]
Moriguchi, Yoshiya [5 ,7 ]
Astrom, Daniel Oudin [6 ]
Christensen, Michael Cronquist
机构
[1] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Neuropsychiat, Osaka, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Kyorin Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Natl Ctr Neurol & Psychiat, Dept Prevent Intervent Psychiat Disorders, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Lundbeck Japan KK, Tokyo, Japan
[6] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Valby, Denmark
[7] Lundbeck Japan KK, Med Affairs, Kamiyacho Prime Pl 8,F4-1-17 Toranomon,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1050001, Japan
关键词
emotional blunting; major depressive disorder; Oxford depression questionnaire; MADRS-emotional blunting; validation; vortioxetine; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; WORK PRODUCTIVITY; CHINESE VERSION; ANHEDONIA; VORTIOXETINE; DISORDER; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.2147/NDT.S428443
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Originally developed in English, the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) is a patient-reported scale specifically developed for assessing emotional blunting in people with major depressive disorder (MDD). We aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ODQ.Patients and methods: This was a prespecified analysis of a prospective, 24-week, multicenter, observational cohort study of employed Japanese outpatients with MDD initiating treatment with vortioxetine according to the Japanese label (JRCT1031210200). Participants were assessed using the Japanese version of the ODQ and other clinical rating scales at baseline and Weeks 8, 12 and 24. Results: One hundred and sixteen patients initiated vortioxetine and had >= 1 post-baseline visit. Directionally, the associations between ODQ scores and other clinical measures were as expected and demonstrated good concurrent validity. Factor analysis shows that the scale has a good fit for three factors. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.912, and the scale also showed good test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients for the ODQ total score and domains ranging between 0.69 and 0.82. ODQ scores had strong positive correlations with symptom severity assessed using the Montgomery and angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale and were moderately correlated with work productivity, overall functioning, and quality of life scales.Conclusion: Data from this prospective analysis confirm that the Japanese version of the ODQ retains the good validity and reliability of the original English scale and is suitable for use in prospective studies wanting to capture treatment effects on emotional blunting in MDD.
引用
收藏
页码:2401 / 2412
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Translation, reliability and validity of Japanese version the TeamSTEPPS® teamwork perceptions questionnaire
    Unoki, Takeshi
    Matsuishi, Yujiro
    Tsujimoto, Takahiro
    Yotsumoto, Ryuichi
    Yamada, Toru
    Komatsu, Yuka
    Kashiwakura, Daisaku
    Yamamoto, Norimasa
    NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (01): : 115 - 122
  • [42] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Valued Living Questionnaire Adapted to Caregiving
    Morimoto, Hiroshi
    Kishita, Naoko
    Kondo, Hikaru
    Muto, Takashi
    CLINICAL GERONTOLOGIST, 2023, 46 (04) : 619 - 632
  • [43] Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the painDETECT Questionnaire: A Multicenter Observational Study
    Matsubayashi, Yoshitaka
    Takeshita, Katsushi
    Sumitani, Masahiko
    Oshima, Yasushi
    Tonosu, Juichi
    Kato, So
    Ohya, Junichi
    Oichi, Takeshi
    Okamoto, Naoki
    Tanaka, Sakae
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (09):
  • [44] Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the inflammatory bowel disease questionnaire
    Hashimoto, H
    Green, J
    Iwao, Y
    Sakurai, T
    Hibi, T
    Fukuhara, S
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 38 (12) : 1138 - 1143
  • [45] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Trypophobia Questionnaire (TQ-J)
    Imaizumi, Shu
    Furuno, Manami
    Hibino, Haruo
    Koyama, Shinichi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 544 - 544
  • [46] The Child Health Questionnaire in Australia: Reliability, validity and population means
    Waters, E
    Salmon, L
    Wake, M
    Hesketh, K
    Wright, M
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 24 (02) : 207 - 210
  • [47] Validity and Reliability of a Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire in an Adult Student Population
    Alkaed, Dima
    Ibrahim, Nadine
    Ismail, Fatima
    Barake, Roula
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR, 2018, 50 (07) : 718 - 723
  • [48] International Physical Activity Questionnaire: Reliability and validity in a Spanish population
    Roman-Vinas, Blanca
    Serra-Majem, Lluis
    Hagstromer, Maria
    Ribas-Barba, Lourdes
    Sjostrom, Michael
    Segura-Cardona, Ramon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2010, 10 (05) : 297 - 304
  • [49] Validity and Reliability of a French Version of the Metacognitions Questionnaire in a Nonclinical Population
    Laro, Frank
    Van der Linden, Martial
    d'Acremont, Mathieu
    SWISS JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 68 (03): : 125 - 132
  • [50] Validity and reliability of "Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire" for the Turkish Population
    Ozakbas, Serkan
    Yigit, Pinar
    Akyuz, Zeynep
    Sagici, Ozge
    Abasiyanik, Zuhal
    Ozdogar, Asiye Tuba
    Kahraman, Turhan
    Bozan, Hemdem Rodi
    Hosgel, Ilknur
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2021, 50