Assessing Reliability and Validity of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) in a Japanese Clinical Population

被引:0
|
作者
Kato, Masaki [1 ]
Kikuchi, Toshiaki [2 ]
Watanabe, Koichiro [3 ]
Sumiyoshi, Tomiki [4 ]
Moriguchi, Yoshiya [5 ,7 ]
Astrom, Daniel Oudin [6 ]
Christensen, Michael Cronquist
机构
[1] Kansai Med Univ, Dept Neuropsychiat, Osaka, Japan
[2] Keio Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Kyorin Univ, Sch Med, Dept Neuropsychiat, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Natl Inst Mental Hlth, Natl Ctr Neurol & Psychiat, Dept Prevent Intervent Psychiat Disorders, Tokyo, Japan
[5] Lundbeck Japan KK, Tokyo, Japan
[6] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Valby, Denmark
[7] Lundbeck Japan KK, Med Affairs, Kamiyacho Prime Pl 8,F4-1-17 Toranomon,Minato Ku, Tokyo 1050001, Japan
关键词
emotional blunting; major depressive disorder; Oxford depression questionnaire; MADRS-emotional blunting; validation; vortioxetine; SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; WORK PRODUCTIVITY; CHINESE VERSION; ANHEDONIA; VORTIOXETINE; DISORDER; PREVALENCE; VALIDATION; ANTIDEPRESSANTS; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.2147/NDT.S428443
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Originally developed in English, the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) is a patient-reported scale specifically developed for assessing emotional blunting in people with major depressive disorder (MDD). We aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the ODQ.Patients and methods: This was a prespecified analysis of a prospective, 24-week, multicenter, observational cohort study of employed Japanese outpatients with MDD initiating treatment with vortioxetine according to the Japanese label (JRCT1031210200). Participants were assessed using the Japanese version of the ODQ and other clinical rating scales at baseline and Weeks 8, 12 and 24. Results: One hundred and sixteen patients initiated vortioxetine and had >= 1 post-baseline visit. Directionally, the associations between ODQ scores and other clinical measures were as expected and demonstrated good concurrent validity. Factor analysis shows that the scale has a good fit for three factors. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.912, and the scale also showed good test-retest reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients for the ODQ total score and domains ranging between 0.69 and 0.82. ODQ scores had strong positive correlations with symptom severity assessed using the Montgomery and angstrom sberg Depression Rating Scale and were moderately correlated with work productivity, overall functioning, and quality of life scales.Conclusion: Data from this prospective analysis confirm that the Japanese version of the ODQ retains the good validity and reliability of the original English scale and is suitable for use in prospective studies wanting to capture treatment effects on emotional blunting in MDD.
引用
收藏
页码:2401 / 2412
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ-Chinese)
    Chen, Jing
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Hong, Wu
    Zhang, Lei
    Mi, Weifeng
    Qin, Jian
    He, Yanling
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2022, 313 : 278 - 282
  • [2] The Japanese version of the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire: Its reliability and validity for lifetime depression in a working population
    Kuwabara, H
    Sakado, K
    Sakado, M
    Sato, T
    Someya, T
    COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 45 (04) : 311 - 315
  • [3] The reliability and validity of the Everyday Feelings Questionnaire in a clinical population
    Mann, Joanna
    Henley, William
    O'Mahen, Heather
    Ford, Tamsin
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2013, 148 (2-3) : 406 - 410
  • [4] Reliability and validity of the Basic Depression Questionnaire
    Guillot-Valdes, Maria
    Guillen-Riquelme, Alejandro
    Buela-Casal, Gualberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 19 (03) : 243 - 250
  • [5] Assessing the validity and reliability of the International Anxiety Questionnaire and the International Depression Questionnaire in two bereaved national samples
    Hyland, Philip
    Redican, Enya
    Karatzias, Thanos
    Shevlin, Mark
    CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2024, 31 (01)
  • [6] Reliability and validity of the Symptoms of Depression Questionnaire (SDQ)
    Pedrelli, Paola
    Blais, Mark A.
    Alpert, Jonathan E.
    Shelton, Richard C.
    Walker, Rosemary S. W.
    Fava, Maurizio
    CNS SPECTRUMS, 2014, 19 (06) : 535 - 546
  • [7] The Oxford ankle foot questionnaire for children SCALING, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY
    Morris, C.
    Doll, H. A.
    Wainwright, A.
    Theologis, T.
    Fitzpatrick, R.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (11): : 1451 - 1456
  • [8] Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire-Japanese version (MMQ-J): Assessing validity and reliability
    Ide, S
    Takahashi, M
    Mori, N
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2004, 44 : 518 - 518
  • [9] The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Temperament and Personality Questionnaire for patients with non-melancholic depression
    Kudo, Yuka
    Nakagawa, Atsuo
    Tamura, Noriko
    Kato, Noriko
    Williams, Aya
    Aida, Nobuo
    Mimura, Masaru
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2016, 198 : 237 - 241
  • [10] Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Parenting Concerns Questionnaire
    Yanai, Misa
    Aoyama, Maho
    Kosugi, Kazuhiro
    Tsumura, Akemi
    Nakanishi, Erika
    Miyashita, Mitsunori
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 54 (07) : 797 - 804