Mapping of lattice distortion in martensitic steel-Comparison of different evaluation methods of EBSD patterns

被引:0
|
作者
Cios, Grzegorz [1 ]
Winkelmann, Aimo [1 ]
Nolze, Gert [2 ,3 ]
Tokarski, Tomasz [1 ]
Rychlowski, Lukasz [1 ]
Dan, Leonid [1 ]
Bala, Piotr [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] AGH Univ Sci & Technol, Acad Ctr Mat & Nanotechnol, Al A Mickiewicza 30, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
[2] Fed Inst Mat Res & Testing BAM Berlin, Unter Eichen 87, D-12205 Berlin, Germany
[3] TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Inst Mineral, Brennhausgasse 14, D-09596 Freiberg, Germany
[4] AGH Univ Krakow, Fac Met & Ind Comp Sci, al A Mickiewicza 30, PL-30059 Krakow, Poland
关键词
EBSD; Steel; Martensite; Tetragonality; Strain; ELECTRON BACKSCATTER DIFFRACTION; ORIENTATION RELATIONSHIPS; ELASTIC STRAINS; DEFORMATION; PRECISION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultramic.2023.113824
中图分类号
TH742 [显微镜];
学科分类号
摘要
To visualize the varying tetragonal distortions in high carbon martensitic steels by EBSD, two different approaches have been applied on backscattered Kikuchi diffraction (BKD) patterns. A band-edge refinement technique called Refined Accuracy (RA) (Oxford Instruments) is compared with a technique called Pattern Matching (PM), which optimizes the fit to a simulated BKD signal. RA distinguishes between hypothetical phases of different fixed c/a, while PM determines a best fitting continuous c/a by projective transformation of a master pattern. Both techniques require stored BKD patterns. The sensitivity of the c/a-determination was tested by investigating the microstructure of a ferritic steel with an expected c/a = 1. The influence of the Kikuchi pattern noise on c/a was compared for a single or 40 averaged frames per measuring point, and turned out to be not significant. The application of RA and PM on the martensitic microstructure delivered qualitatively similar maps of c/a. The comparison of RA and PM shows that RA is suitably fast and precise during mapping the martensite c/a ratio in analyses of high carbon martensite, especially for fast initial surveys. As RA leads quantitatively to higher noise in c/a, the PM analysis can be used for higher precision results.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Validation and Comparison of Alternative Methods for Evaluation of Entrainment Mapping
    Derejko, Pawel
    Szumowski, Lukasz J.
    Sanders, Prashanthan
    Dimitri, Hany
    Kuklik, Pawel
    Przybylski, Andrzej
    Urbanek, Piotr
    Szufladowicz, Ewa
    Bodalski, Robert
    Sacher, Frederic
    Haissaguerre, Michel
    Walczak, Franciszek
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (07) : 741 - 748
  • [22] Uncertainty Analysis of Distortion Measurement of Laser Differential Confocal by Different Evaluation Methods
    Quan, Yuan
    Yi, Yang
    Lin, Zhang
    Dong, Shizhen
    Hua, Ma
    Huan, Ren
    AOPC 2017: LASER COMPONENTS, SYSTEMS, AND APPLICATIONS, 2017, 10457
  • [23] Comparison among different patterns of priority vectors estimation methods
    Lipovetsky, Stan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 39 (03) : 301 - 311
  • [24] Comparison of Apical Leakage Patterns Shown by Two Different Methods
    Modaresi, Jalil
    Davari, Abdorahim
    Daneshkazemi, Alireza
    PESQUISA BRASILEIRA EM ODONTOPEDIATRIA E CLINICA INTEGRADA, 2007, 7 (02): : 169 - 172
  • [25] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EVALUATION METHODS IN MODULATED TEMPERATURE DSC
    SCHAWE, JEK
    THERMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1995, 260 : 1 - 16
  • [26] EVALUATION OF DIALYSIS INDEX - COMPARISON OF 4 DIFFERENT METHODS
    ZOUMBARIDIS, N
    FITILI, C
    MAVROMATIDIS, K
    DOMBROS, N
    KARAGIANNI, A
    SOMBOLOS, K
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 39 (01) : 189 - 189
  • [27] A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS OF PAPER SURFACE SMOOTHNESS EVALUATION
    Singh, Surendra P.
    BIORESOURCES, 2008, 3 (02) : 503 - 516
  • [28] Comparison of different methods of sire evaluation in Murrah buffaloes
    Pandey, AK
    Singh, H
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 1999, 69 (12): : 1067 - 1069
  • [29] Asthma control evaluation: comparison between different methods
    Paiva, M.
    Martins, P.
    Carvalho, S.
    Chambel, M.
    Matos, A.
    Almeida, I
    Luisa, Ana P.
    Neuparth, N.
    Pinto, Leiria P.
    ALLERGY, 2009, 64 : 437 - 437
  • [30] OBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE PHASE IMAGE - A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS
    LIEHN, JC
    HANNEQUIN, P
    AMICO, S
    DESCHILDRE, A
    ELAERTS, J
    BAJOLET, A
    VALEYRE, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1984, 9 (07): : A89 - A89