A computational model of red blood cells using an isogeometric formulation with T-splines and a lattice Boltzmann method

被引:0
|
作者
Asai, Yusuke [1 ]
Ishida, Shunichi [1 ]
Takeda, Hironori [1 ]
Nakaie, Gakuto [1 ]
Terahara, Takuya [2 ]
Taniguchi, Yasutoshi [2 ]
Takizawa, Kenji [2 ]
Imai, Yohsuke [1 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Grad Sch Engn, Kobe, Japan
[2] Waseda Univ, Dept Modern Mech Engn, Shinjuku City, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Red blood cell; Fluid-structure interaction; Helfrich bending energy; Isogeometric analysis; Lattice Boltzmann method; Membrane strain; LIQUID CAPSULES; BUCKLING INSTABILITY; FINITE-ELEMENT; DEFORMATION; FLOW; SUSPENSIONS; MEMBRANE; SIMULATIONS; STRESS; MOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2024.104081
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The red blood cell (RBC) membrane is often modeled by Skalak strain energy and Helfrich bending energy functions, for which high -order representation of the membrane surface is required. We develop a numerical model of RBCs using an isogeometric discretization with Tsplines. A variational formulation is applied to compute the external load on the membrane with a direct discretization of second-order parametric derivatives. For fluid-structure interaction, the isogeometric analysis is coupled with the lattice Boltzmann method via the immersed boundary method. An oblate spheroid with a reduced volume of 0.95 and zero spontaneous curvature is used for the reference configuration of RBCs. The surface shear elastic modulus is estimated to be ������s = 4.0 x 10-6 N/m, and the bending modulus is estimated to be ������B = 4.5 x 10-19 J by numerical tests. We demonstrate that for physiological viscosity ratio, the typical motions of the RBC in shear flow are rolling and complex swinging, but simple swinging or tank-treading appears at very high shear rates. We also show that the computed apparent viscosity of the RBC channel flow is a reasonable agreement with an empirical equation. We finally show that the maximum membrane strain of RBCs for a large channel (twice of the RBC diameter) can be larger than that for a small channel (three-quarters of the RBC diameter). This is caused by a difference in the strain distribution between the slipper and parachute shapes of RBCs in the channel flows.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条