Electromagnetic Immunity of Pacemakers and Implantable Defibrillators to Wireless Power Transfer Systems for Automotive: A Provocative Study

被引:2
|
作者
Vivarelli, Cecilia [1 ,2 ]
Censi, Federica [1 ]
Calcagnini, Giovanni [1 ]
Freschi, Fabio [3 ]
Giaccone, Luca [3 ,4 ]
Canova, Aldo [3 ]
Mattei, Eugenio [1 ]
机构
[1] Italian Natl Inst Hlth ISS, Dept Cardiovasc, Endocrine Metab Dis & Aging, I-00161 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Ingn Civile & Ingn Informat DICII, I-00173 Rome, Italy
[3] Politecn Torino, Dept Energy Galileo Ferraris, I-00173 Turin, Italy
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Informat Technol & Elect Engn, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Coils; Lead; Phantoms; Electromagnetic interference; Standards; Torso; Sensors; Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) and interference; immunity testing; implantable defibrillator; pacemakers (PMs); wireless power transmission; INTERFERENCE;
D O I
10.1109/TEMC.2023.3338453
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Wireless power transfer (WPT) in automotive is an emerging technology that utilizes coupled coils to transfer power through time-varying magnetic fields, enabling the charging of electric vehicles. Like any electromagnetic field source, WPT systems can potentially interfere with other electronic devices, impacting their proper functioning. This risk requires evaluation, especially when the affected device is a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED), as malfunctioning can pose serious hazards to the patient's safety. Currently, WPT technology is in its early stages and has not been explicitly considered during the drafting of current CIED regulations. Consequently, predicting the behavior of a CIED when in proximity to a WPT system is not straightforward, and new experimental data are necessary. The objective of this article is to conduct in-vitro testing on a representative sample of pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter/defibrillators exposed to a magnetic field at the frequency of WTP systems, with field levels gradually increasing up to ICNIRP occupational reference levels. Compared to previous studies, the main novelty is to assess, on 11 commercial CIEDs, a safety margin for the exposure to the magnetic field dispersed by a WPT system, under worst-case exposure condition. Over a total of 51 conducted tests 24 interfering events were observed: only 1 occurred with a magnetic field at 50 mu T while all the others were observed with higher field levels, at 75 and 100 mu T. Thus, the results of this research demonstrate that the risk of interference is very low. Electromagnetic interference phenomena were observed only under worst-case conditions (e.g., maximum sensitivity of the device, maximum lead loop area, pulsed modulation, and unipolar configuration for PMs) and at exposure levels above the ICNIRP general population reference levels.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 107
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interference of programmed electromagnetic stimulation with pacemakers and automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators
    Gwechenberger, Marianne
    Rauscha, Friedrich
    Stix, Guenter
    Schmid, Gernot
    Strametz-Juranek, Jeanette
    [J]. BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 2006, 27 (05) : 365 - 377
  • [2] Patients, Pacemakers, and Implantable Defibrillators: Human Values and Security for Wireless Implantable Medical Devices
    Denning, Tamara
    Borning, Alan
    Friedman, Batya
    Gill, Brian T.
    Kohno, Tadayoshi
    Maisel, William H.
    [J]. CHI2010: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, VOLS 1-4, 2010, : 917 - +
  • [3] Electromagnetic Interference of Avalanche Transceivers with Cardiac Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
    Dorenkamp, Marc
    Blaschke, Florian
    Voigt, Kathleen
    Fleck, Eckart
    Goetze, Stephan
    Roser, Mattias
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (08): : 931 - 938
  • [4] Safety of Electromagnetic Articulography in Patients With Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators
    Joglar, Jose A.
    Nguyen, Carol
    Garst, Diane M.
    Katz, William F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2009, 52 (04): : 1082 - 1087
  • [5] Exploring Electromagnetic Interference Between Pacemakers, Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, and Capsule Endoscopy
    Fleming, Peter
    Lossen, Victoria
    Brown, Janine
    Lerner, Paul
    Verhoef, William
    Koppola, James
    Eddy, Steven
    Neuman, Stacey
    Herre, John
    Johnson, David
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 105 : S529 - S529
  • [6] Electromagnetic Interference With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at Power Frequency An In Vivo Study
    Napp, Andreas
    Joosten, Stephan
    Stunder, Dominik
    Knackstedt, Christian
    Zink, Matthias
    Bellmann, Barbara
    Marx, Nikolaus
    Schauerte, Patrick
    Silny, Jiri
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2014, 129 (04) : 441 - 450
  • [7] ELECTROMAGNETIC IMMUNITY OF IMPLANTABLE PACEMAKERS EXPOSED TO WI-FI DEVICES
    Mattei, Eugenio
    Censi, Federica
    Triventi, Michele
    Calcagnini, Giovanni
    [J]. HEALTH PHYSICS, 2014, 107 (04): : 318 - 325
  • [8] Remote, wireless, ambulatory monitoring of implantable pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy systems: Analysis of a worldwide database
    Lazarus, Arnaud
    [J]. PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 30 : S2 - S12
  • [9] Wireless power transmission equipment used for implantable cardiac pacemakers
    Lv, Shuangqing
    Chen, Wenjie
    Hu, Xiufang
    Yang, Yang
    [J]. 2019 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER ELECTRONICS AND ECCE ASIA (ICPE 2019 - ECCE ASIA), 2019, : 2185 - 2190
  • [10] Pacemakers and implantable cardiac defibrillators: Software radio attacks and zero-power defenses
    Halperin, Daniel
    Clark, Shane S.
    Fu, Kevin
    Heydt-Benjamin, Thomas S.
    Defend, Benessa
    Kohno, Tadayoshi
    Ransford, Benjamin
    Morgan, Will
    Maisel, William H.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2008 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY, 2008, : 129 - +