Crossmodal Sequential Interaction Network for Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Joint Classification

被引:0
|
作者
Yu, Wenbo [1 ,2 ]
Huang, He [1 ]
Shen, Yi [3 ]
Shen, Gangxiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Suzhou 215006, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Aerosp Informat Res Inst, State Key Lab Remote Sensing Sci, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Inst Technol, Dept Control Sci & Engn, Harbin 150001, Peoples R China
关键词
Laser radar; Three-dimensional displays; Spatial diversity; Single-photon avalanche diodes; Streams; Feature extraction; Task analysis; Crossmodal sequential characteristic (seqCHA); hyperspectral (HS); joint classification; light detection and ranging (LiDAR); multimodality;
D O I
10.1109/LGRS.2024.3365715
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Numerous deep learning (DL) studies have indicated that fusing hyperspectral (HS) and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data is effective for land-cover classification. However, the sequential characteristics (seqCHAs) in the spatial domain are always ambiguous and neglected. In this letter, we propose a deep crossmodal sequential interaction network (CsiNet) for HS and LiDAR data joint classification. We aim to verify the contributions of crossmodal seqCHAs in multimodal joint classification tasks and present an effective crossmodal sequential flattening (SF) strategy. Specifically, CsiNet sorts the neighboring samples in terms of the spectral and 3-D spatial diversities between the corresponding samples and the central one. Notably, the 3-D spatial diversity considers the shared sample positions in both modalities and the sample elevations in LiDAR data simultaneously. CsiNet is capable of extracting crossmodal sequential features comprehensively by long and short-term memory (LSTM) layers and better simulating sequential properties of samples compared with convolutional layer based networks. Experiments conducted on the Muufl Gulfport (MUUFL) and Houston 2013 datasets prove that CsiNet outperforms several state-of-the-art techniques qualitatively and quantitatively. When using 1% training samples per category, the overall accuracies of CsiNet on both datasets achieve 90.27% and 92.41% and are increased by 0.27% and 0.17% than the best comparison technique, respectively. Ablation experiments verify the effectiveness of CsiNet by replacing the crossmodal SF strategy with several alternative ones.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multiview Feature Learning and Multilevel Information Fusion for Joint Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data
    Feng, Jia
    Zhang, Junping
    Zhang, Ye
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 61
  • [32] Joint Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Based on Adaptive Gating Mechanism and Learnable Transformer
    Wang, Minhui
    Sun, Yaxiu
    Xiang, Jianhong
    Sun, Rui
    Zhong, Yu
    REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [33] Hyperspectral Image Classification Aided by LiDAR Data
    Deng, Zheng
    Zhao, Genping
    Zhao, Shihui
    Wang, Li
    Wang, Zhuowei
    Wu, Heng
    Cheng, Lianglun
    FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GRAPHICS AND IMAGE PROCESSING, ICGIP 2022, 2022, 12705
  • [34] CMSE: Cross-Modal Semantic Enhancement Network for Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data
    Han, Wenqi
    Miao, Wang
    Geng, Jie
    Jiang, Wen
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 62 (1-14): : 1 - 14
  • [35] MSLAENet: Multiscale Learning and Attention Enhancement Network for Fusion Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data
    Fan, Yingying
    Qian, Yurong
    Qin, Yugang
    Wan, Yaling
    Gong, Weijun
    Chu, Zhuang
    Liu, Hui
    IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2022, 15 : 10041 - 10054
  • [36] Artificial Neural Network Approach for Land Cover Classification of Fused Hyperspectral and Lidar Data
    Giampouras, Paris
    Charou, Eleni
    Kesidis, Anastasios
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS, AIAI 2013, 2013, 412 : 255 - 261
  • [37] Spectral-Spatial-Language Fusion Network for Hyperspectral, LiDAR, and Text Data Classification
    Cao, Mengxin
    Zhao, Guixin
    Lv, Guohua
    Dong, Aimei
    Guo, Ying
    Dong, Xiangjun
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 62 : 1 - 15
  • [38] Joint Classification of Hyperspectral and LiDAR Data Using Hierarchical Random Walk and Deep CNN Architecture
    Zhao, Xudong
    Tao, Ran
    Li, Wei
    Li, Heng-Chao
    Du, Qian
    Liao, Wenzhi
    Philips, Wilfried
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 58 (10): : 7355 - 7370
  • [39] Hyperspectral tree species classification with an aid of lidar data
    Matsuki, Tomohiro
    Yokoya, Naoto
    Iwasaki, Akira
    Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing, Evolution in Remote Sensing, 2014, 2014-June
  • [40] DEEP FUSION OF HYPERSPECTRAL AND LIDAR DATA FOR THEMATIC CLASSIFICATION
    Chen, Yushi
    Li, Chunyang
    Ghamisi, Pedram
    Shi, Chunyu
    Gu, Yanfeng
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2016, : 3591 - 3594