Return to Duty in Military Service Members Following Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Cognetti, Daniel J. [1 ]
Anderson, Kevin D. [1 ]
Handcox, Jordan E. [2 ]
Jorgensen, Anton Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] San Antonio Mil Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Antonio, TX 78234 USA
[2] UT Hlth San Antonio, Dept Orthoped Surg, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[3] Ortho San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78209 USA
关键词
LOW-BACK-PAIN; CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT; DYSFUNCTION; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/milmed/usad330
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction As the utilization of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) continues to expand, a better understanding of postoperative outcomes is needed, particularly in young and active individuals. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of this procedure in an active duty military population by examining return-to-duty (RTD) rates. Materials and Methods A retrospective review of the electronic medical record from a tertiary military medical center was performed for active duty service members undergoing SIJF from January 2013 to January 2019. The primary outcome measured was RTD at 6 months, with active duty status at 1 year, last follow-up, and revision surgery as secondary outcomes. Demographic and surgical variables recorded included patient age, gender, military rank, utilization of navigation, and implant type. Results Sixteen service members met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age of 40.5 & PLUSMN; 6.7 years. The mean follow-up after surgery was 24 & PLUSMN; 15 months. Patients received either cylindrical (n = 6) or triangular (n = 10) implants placed with (n = 6) or without (n = 10) navigation. Within 6 months of surgery, 56% of patients were able to RTD. Patients undergoing navigation-assisted procedures were significantly more likely to RTD at 6 months (100% vs. 30%, P = .011) compared to those undergoing surgery performed with orthogonal fluoroscopic imaging. Compared to those with cylindrical implants, patients with triangular implants were also more likely to RTD at 6 months (80% vs. 17%, P = .035). Conclusions Following SIJF, a small majority of service members were able to return to full active duty status by 6 months. Further studies are needed to assess the potential benefits of navigation and implant selection, as our retrospective review noted differences in outcomes based on these variables.
引用
收藏
页码:e668 / e673
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Propensity-matched Analysis of 1062 Patients Following Minimally Invasive Versus Open Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
    Ballatori, Alexander M.
    Shahrestani, Shane
    Chen, Xiao T.
    Ton, Andy
    Wang, Jeffrey C.
    Buser, Zorica
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (08): : E477 - E482
  • [22] Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ)
    Kasapovic, Adnan
    Ali, Thaer
    Jaenisch, Max
    Rommelspacher, Yorck
    Gathen, Martin
    Pflugmacher, Robert
    Schwetje, Desiree
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2022, 34 (02): : 98 - 108
  • [23] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Fusion-a Review
    Matias, Caio M.
    Velagapudi, Lohit
    Montenegro, Thiago S.
    Heller, Joshua E.
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2022, 26 (03) : 173 - 182
  • [24] Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction: 2-Dimensional Operative Video
    Holste, Katherine G. G.
    Saleh, Sara
    Bruzek, Amy K. K.
    Strong, Michael J. J.
    Park, Paul
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 23 (01) : E54 - E54
  • [25] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion for the Treatment of Brucella Pyogenic Sacroiliitis: A Case Report
    Anton, Gustavo
    Tong, Doris
    Little, Tania
    Soo, Teck M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 11 (11)
  • [26] Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: One-Year Outcomes in 40 Patients
    Sachs, Donald
    Capobianco, Robyn
    ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 2013
  • [27] A systematic review of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion utilizing a lateral transarticular technique
    Heiney, Jake
    Capobianco, Robyn
    Cher, Daniel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2015, 9
  • [28] First clinical results of a novel minimally-invasive fusion system for the sacroiliac joint
    Kasapovic, Adnan
    Schwetje, Desiree
    Ali, Thaer
    Jaenisch, Max
    Gathen, Martin
    Bornemann, Rahel
    Abdallah, Hany
    Vieweg, Uwe
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2022, 30 (05) : 1139 - 1145
  • [29] Clinical outcomes for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with allograft using a posterior approach
    Moghim, Robert
    Bovinet, Chris
    Jin, Max Y.
    Edwards, Katie
    Abd-Elsayed, Alaa
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2024,
  • [30] Contemporary Trends in Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Utilization in the Medicare Population by Specialty
    Hersh, Andrew M.
    Jimenez, Adrian E.
    Pellot, Karolina I.
    Gong, Jung Ho
    Jiang, Kelly
    Khalifeh, Jawad M.
    Ahmed, A. Karim
    Raad, Micheal
    Veeravagu, Anand
    Ratliff, John K.
    Jain, Amit
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Bydon, Ali
    Witham, Timothy F.
    Theodore, Nicholas
    Azad, Tej D.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 93 (06) : 1244 - 1250