Seismic performance of U-shaped spillway retaining wall from shake table tests

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Kyungtae [1 ]
Khalifa, Mokhtar A. [2 ]
Naggar, M. Hesham El [2 ]
Elgamal, Ahmed [3 ]
机构
[1] Calif Dept Transportat, Sacramento, CA USA
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, London, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Struct Engn, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
Seismic response; Retaining wall; Backfill; Lateral earth pressure; Shaking table; EARTH PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108020
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
A series of large-scale shake table tests were performed to evaluate the seismic behavior of a U-shaped spillway retaining wall. Three test model configurations were employed using different backfill conditions in terms of in -place soil density. Two earthquake records were employed as input motion and scaled in terms of time duration and acceleration amplitude to assess various aspects of seismic response. The test results showed that dynamic wall deflection and wall bending moment generally increased with Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) amplitude. At peak wall deflection, the seismic earth pressure increment coefficient (Delta KAE) was back-calculated from the measured bending moment along each wall. In addition, the location of Delta KAE along the wall height and the resulting base moment were evaluated and discussed. The results suggested that seismic demands were generally lower up to a PGA of about 0.8 g, compared to the classic Seed and Whitman recommendation for seismic lateral earth pressure and seismic bending moment of retaining walls. Beyond PGA of 0.8 g, test results were in general agreement with the Seed and Whitman solution. Finally, two-dimensional finite element analyses were per-formed, and the computational results showed overall reasonable agreement with the experimental data.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Seismic performance of slender RC U-shaped walls with a single-layer of reinforcement
    Hoult, Ryan
    Appelle, Aaron
    Almeida, Joao
    Beyer, Katrin
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2020, 225
  • [32] Experimental Investigation of Seismic Uncertainty Propagation through Shake Table Tests
    Deng, Peng
    Pei, Shiling
    van de Lindt, John W.
    Zhang, Chao
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 144 (03)
  • [33] Shake table tests for the seismic assessment of hollow brick internal partitions
    Petrone, Crescenzo
    Magliulo, Gennaro
    Manfredi, Giuseppe
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 72 : 203 - 214
  • [34] Seismic performance of SSPQ retaining wall-Centrifuge model tests and numerical evaluation
    Bao, Xiao-Hua
    Ye, Guan-Lin
    Ye, Bin
    Sago, Yasuki
    Zhang, Feng
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2014, 61-62 : 63 - 82
  • [35] AROUSAL AND PERFORMANCE - AN INVERTED U-SHAPED RELATIONSHIP
    APPEL, MA
    HOLROYD, KA
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1980, 17 (03) : 302 - 302
  • [36] SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RAISED FLOOR SYSTEM BY SHAKE TABLE EXCITATIONS
    Liao, Wen-I
    Chai, Juin-Fu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING CONFERENCE, VOL 8: SEISMIC ENGINEERING, 2009, : 225 - 230
  • [37] Numerical Investigation on the Interaction between a U-Shaped Pile Supporting Structure and an Adjacent Gravity Retaining Wall in River Dredging
    Yan, Jiaqi
    Qin, Zipeng
    Jiang, Ning
    Zhou, Linzhen
    Chen, Zengran
    Niu, Yaqiang
    Zhang, Yu
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [38] Shaking Table Tests on Seismic Behavior of Geogrid-reinforced Retaining Wall with Waste Steel Slag Backfill
    Wang L.-Y.
    Li J.-S.
    Tao Y.-X.
    Wang B.-H.
    Yan J.-T.
    Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34 (01): : 35 - 46
  • [39] Experimental evaluation of a U-shaped steel plate as a seismic fuse
    Mowafy, Ahmed
    Imanpour, Ali
    Chui, Ying-Hei
    Daneshvar, Hossein
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2024, 215
  • [40] Testing of seismic dampers with replaceable U-shaped steel plates
    Qu, Bing
    Dai, Chunxue
    Qiu, Jin
    Hou, Hetao
    Qiu, Canxing
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2019, 179 : 625 - 639