Readability of online COVID-19 health information and advice

被引:7
|
作者
Bould, Kathryn [1 ]
Forshaw, Mark J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Sch Psychol, Tom Reilly Bldg Byrom St, Liverpool L3 3AF, Merseyside, England
关键词
Readability; COVID-19; coronavirus; online health information; INTERNET; QUALITY; NEEDS;
D O I
10.1080/14635240.2022.2098160
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Readability is a systematic measure of ease, with which written information can be read and understood. It can affect the reader's ability to access, comprehend, and utilize health information. This study assessed the readability of online COVID-19 information readily available to the public to engage with. At a time when organisations and institutions were rapidly providing advice and reacting to a developing pandemic, it was hypothesised that some of that haste would be associated with a lack of clarity, as measured by readability indices. N = 65 website sources containing information relating to COVID-19 were accessed and assessed for inclusion in the study. Eight readability indices, including Flesch Reading Ease and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, were calculated to determine readability scores for each source of information. Readability scores varied greatly between individual sources of COVID-19 information. Despite the recommendation that information be presented to the general public at a sixth-grade reading level, most websites we assessed addressing COVID-19 information and advice presented content at greater than the recommended reading level. Based on these results, a significant amount of information available on the Internet about COVID-19 will not be easily readable for many individuals attempting to use the Internet to help inform their decisions about their health and behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 209
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quality of online information for the general public on COVID-19
    Jayasinghe, Ravindri
    Ranasinghe, Sonali
    Jayarajah, Umesh
    Seneviratne, Sanjeewa
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2020, 103 (12) : 2594 - 2597
  • [33] Understanding Online Health Risk Information Seeking and Avoiding during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Zhou, Xin
    Roberto, Anthony J.
    Lu, Anya Hommadova
    HEALTH COMMUNICATION, 2023, 38 (03) : 532 - 542
  • [34] Increased demand for abortion information and advice during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Cheng, Yan
    Botfield, Jessica
    Boerma, Clare
    Estoesta, Jane
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2023, 63 (05): : 728 - 729
  • [35] COVID-19 Health Information System Assessments
    Saso, Miriam
    Schutte, N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [36] Trust in COVID-19 public health information
    Verma, Nitin
    Fleischmann, Kenneth R.
    Zhou, Le
    Xie, Bo
    Lee, Min Kyung
    Rich, Kate
    Shiroma, Kristina
    Jia, Chenyan
    Zimmerman, Tara
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 73 (12) : 1776 - 1792
  • [37] Whose Advice is Credible? Claiming Lay Expertise in a Covid-19 Online Community
    Au, Larry
    Eyal, Gil
    QUALITATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (01) : 31 - 61
  • [38] Whose Advice is Credible? Claiming Lay Expertise in a Covid-19 Online Community
    Larry Au
    Gil Eyal
    Qualitative Sociology, 2022, 45 : 31 - 61
  • [39] Improving COVID-19 vaccine-related health literacy and vaccine uptake in patients: Comparison on the readability of patient information leaflets of approved COVID-19 vaccines COMMENT
    Moore, John E.
    Millar, Beverley C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 46 (06) : 1498 - 1500
  • [40] Readability and quality of online patient health information on parotidectomy
    Tan, J. Y.
    Tan, Y. C.
    Yap, D.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2023, 137 (12): : 1378 - 1383