Physiologically based absorption modeling to predict the bioequivalence of two cilostazol formulations

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Lu [1 ]
Zhao, Pengfei [1 ]
Luo, Ting [1 ]
Yang, Dandan [1 ]
Jiang, Qianqian [1 ]
Chen, Jinliang [1 ]
Lou, Honggang [1 ]
Ruan, Zourong [1 ]
Jiang, Bo [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Ctr Clin Pharmacol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, 88 Jiefang Rd, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
FOOD;
D O I
10.1111/cts.13633
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
In vivo pharmacokinetic simulations and virtual bioequivalence (BE) evaluation of cilostazol have not yet been described for humans. Here, we successfully developed a physiologically based absorption model to simulate plasma concentrations of cilostazol. In addition, virtual population simulations integrating dissolution of 0.3% sodium dodecyl sulfate water media were executed to evaluate the BE of test and reference formulations. Simulation results show that test and reference formulations were bioequivalent among 28 subjects, but not nine subjects, consistent with clinical studies. The model proved to be an important tool to show potential BE for cilostazol. This finding may facilitate understanding of the potential risks during the development of generic products.
引用
收藏
页码:2323 / 2330
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bioequivalence of two lithium formulations in healthy volunteers
    Guilherme, Marcia Cristina
    Pereira, Darcio Gomes
    Galuppo, Miriam Prado
    Mendes, Gustavo D.
    Donato, Jose Luiz
    De Nucci, Gilberto
    ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2006, 56 (07): : 524 - 528
  • [32] Bioequivalence of two oral formulations of piroxicam.
    Carrasco-Portugal, MD
    Reyes-García, G
    Medina-Santillán, R
    Herrera, JE
    Flores-Murrieta, FJ
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 42 (09): : 1066 - 1066
  • [33] Evaluation of Bioequivalence of Two Oral Formulations of Olanzapine
    Singhal, R.
    Thakkar, V.
    Srivastava, A.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 73 (06) : 678 - U123
  • [34] Bioequivalence study of two galenic formulations of capecitabine
    Montange, D.
    Chaigneau, L.
    Pivot, X.
    Kantelip, J. P.
    Royer, B.
    FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2009, 23 : 50 - 50
  • [35] Bioequivalence of two oral ciprofloxacin tablets formulations
    Cuadrado, A
    Gascón, AR
    Solinís, MA
    Ramirez, E
    Hernández, RM
    Knie, U
    Pedraz, JL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2004, 42 (06) : 336 - 341
  • [36] Bioequivalence evaluation of two rosiglitazone tablet formulations
    Yusuf, Ahmed
    Al-Gaai, Eman
    Hammami, Muhammad M.
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2006, 56 (11): : 740 - 743
  • [37] Bioequivalence study of two tablet formulations of sildenafil
    Spinola, Ana Cristina Franco
    Ahmeida, Susana
    Filipe, Augusto
    Tanguay, Mario
    Yritia, Mercedes
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2008, 58 (03): : 122 - 125
  • [38] Biorelevant dissolution testing and physiologically based absorption modeling to predict in vivo performance of supersaturating drug delivery systems
    Thakore, Samarth
    Sirvi, Arvind
    Joshi, Vikram C.
    Panigrahi, Sanjali S.
    Manna, Arijita
    Singh, Ridhima
    Sangamwar, Abhay
    Bansal, Arvind K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2021, 607
  • [39] Bioequivalence study of two letrozole tablet formulations
    Filipe, Augusto
    Almeida, Susana
    Franco Spinola, Ana Cristina
    Trabelsi, Fethi
    Ortuno, Jordi
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2008, 58 (08): : 419 - 422
  • [40] Bioequivalence of two oral formulations of cephalexin.
    Flores-Murrieta, FJ
    Carrasco-Portugal, MC
    Aguilar-Carrasco, JC
    Aguilar-Cota, ME
    Herrera, JE
    Reyes-Garcia, G
    Medina-Santillán, R
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 45 (09): : 1079 - 1079