Effectiveness and driving mechanism of ecological restoration efforts in China from 2009 to 2019

被引:21
|
作者
Zhang, Yiqing [1 ]
Zhao, Xiang [1 ]
Gong, Jian [2 ]
Luo, Fang [1 ]
Pan, Yupiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 43074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological restoration; Effectiveness evaluation; Ecosystem service value; Driving mechanisms; CLIMATE-CHANGE; VEGETATION RESTORATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RIVER BASIN; LAND; DESERTIFICATION; REGION; PM2.5;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168676
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the past decades, China's rapid economic growth and industrialization have led to serious ecological concerns. To combat ecological degradation and promote ecosystem sustainability, China has made substantial investments in ecological restoration in recent decades. Nevertheless, a comprehensive analysis of the effec-tiveness and driving mechanisms of these efforts are still lacking. Therefore, this study aims to bridge this gap by employing national land-use survey data to evaluate the effectiveness and driving mechanisms of China's ecological restoration efforts during 2009-2019, with a specific focus on ecological land preservation, land use structure, and their contribution to ecosystem services. Additionally, the Geodetector model was used to detect potential influencing factors and driving mechanisms of these efforts. The results of this study revealed that: (1) Between 2009 and 2019, a total of 585,492.61 km2 of non-ecological land was successfully transformed into ecological land through various ecological restoration efforts. Most of these areas were previously unused or cultivated land. (2) Forest and grass plantations were the major ecological restoration efforts in China, ac-counting for 47.35% and 41.91% of the total restored ecological land, respectively. Grassland restoration clus-tered northwest of the Hu Line, while forest restoration concentrated mainly to the southeast. Water and wetlands restoration were mainly distributed around China's major rivers, such as the Yangtze River and Yellow River. (3) China's ecological restoration efforts contributed to a 2.53 trillion CNY yuan increase in ecosystem service value during 2009-2019, with over 65% of the increase attributed to ecosystem regulating services. (4) China's ecological restoration efforts were mainly influenced by anthropogenic factors, such as population, land use, and urbanization, while the non-linearly enhanced interaction between natural and other factors also de-serves attention. China should balance urban expansion, agricultural development, and ecological preservation, aligning restoration with socioeconomic trends while establishing effective inter-regional ecological compen-sation mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Zoning strategies for ecological restoration in the karst region of Guangdong province, China: a perspective from the "social-ecological system"
    Liu, Yang
    Huang, Jiajun
    Lin, Wei
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 12
  • [42] Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Driving Mechanism of Coupling Coordination between New-Type Urbanization and Ecological Environment in China
    Zhang, Yao
    Wei, Taoyuan
    Tian, Wentao
    Zhao, Kai
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [43] Identifying land restoration regions and their driving mechanisms in inner Mongolia, China from 1981 to 2010
    Xu, Duanyang
    Wang, Ziyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 2019, 167 : 79 - 86
  • [44] Evaluating the effectiveness of ecological restoration of hard bank rivers: a case study from Shedu river port, China (vol 67, pg 824, 2018)
    Van Tai Tang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2019, 68 (05): : 368 - 368
  • [45] Driving mechanism for farmers' participation in improving farmland ecosystem: Evidence from China
    Yin, Yanshu
    Zhang, Yingnan
    Li, Fuduo
    Jiao, Jian
    Lebailly, Philippe
    Zhang, Yang
    Yin, Changbin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 380
  • [46] Spatial characteristics of ecological degradation and restoration in China from 2000 to 2015 using remote sensing
    Cao, Yanni
    Kong, Lingqiao
    Zhang, Lufeng
    Ouyang, Zhiyun
    [J]. RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2020, 28 (06) : 1419 - 1430
  • [47] Does financial support for grassland conservation and restoration improve ecological benefits? evidence from China
    Li, Ting
    Yin, JinPeng
    Zhong, Kaiyang
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 159
  • [48] Ecosystem service assessment under ecological restoration programs: A systematic review of studies from China
    Liu, Junyan
    Du, Jie
    Zhang, Chenfeng
    Zhang, Jindong
    Yang, Hongbo
    Donald, Marion L.
    Wu, Yan
    Dong, Tingfa
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [49] Farmland abandonment in the mountainous areas from an ecological restoration perspective: A case study of Chongqing, China
    Li, Shuzhen
    Xiao, Jing
    Lei, Xiaoyan
    Wang, Yahui
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 153
  • [50] Optimal options of ecological restoration patterns in semi-arid regions: Lessons learned from two-decade ecological restoration projects in Bashang Plateau of China
    Zheng, Lifu
    Rong, Yuejing
    Yan, Yan
    Zheng, Tianchen
    Luo, Yue
    Guo, Jiawei
    Wang, Zetong
    Wang, Chenxing
    Zhao, Yu
    Zhao, Chunli
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2023, : 1 - 15