Effectiveness and driving mechanism of ecological restoration efforts in China from 2009 to 2019

被引:21
|
作者
Zhang, Yiqing [1 ]
Zhao, Xiang [1 ]
Gong, Jian [2 ]
Luo, Fang [1 ]
Pan, Yupiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Geosci, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 43074, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ecological restoration; Effectiveness evaluation; Ecosystem service value; Driving mechanisms; CLIMATE-CHANGE; VEGETATION RESTORATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RIVER BASIN; LAND; DESERTIFICATION; REGION; PM2.5;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168676
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the past decades, China's rapid economic growth and industrialization have led to serious ecological concerns. To combat ecological degradation and promote ecosystem sustainability, China has made substantial investments in ecological restoration in recent decades. Nevertheless, a comprehensive analysis of the effec-tiveness and driving mechanisms of these efforts are still lacking. Therefore, this study aims to bridge this gap by employing national land-use survey data to evaluate the effectiveness and driving mechanisms of China's ecological restoration efforts during 2009-2019, with a specific focus on ecological land preservation, land use structure, and their contribution to ecosystem services. Additionally, the Geodetector model was used to detect potential influencing factors and driving mechanisms of these efforts. The results of this study revealed that: (1) Between 2009 and 2019, a total of 585,492.61 km2 of non-ecological land was successfully transformed into ecological land through various ecological restoration efforts. Most of these areas were previously unused or cultivated land. (2) Forest and grass plantations were the major ecological restoration efforts in China, ac-counting for 47.35% and 41.91% of the total restored ecological land, respectively. Grassland restoration clus-tered northwest of the Hu Line, while forest restoration concentrated mainly to the southeast. Water and wetlands restoration were mainly distributed around China's major rivers, such as the Yangtze River and Yellow River. (3) China's ecological restoration efforts contributed to a 2.53 trillion CNY yuan increase in ecosystem service value during 2009-2019, with over 65% of the increase attributed to ecosystem regulating services. (4) China's ecological restoration efforts were mainly influenced by anthropogenic factors, such as population, land use, and urbanization, while the non-linearly enhanced interaction between natural and other factors also de-serves attention. China should balance urban expansion, agricultural development, and ecological preservation, aligning restoration with socioeconomic trends while establishing effective inter-regional ecological compen-sation mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Study on the evolution and driving mechanism of land function in China from 2005 to 2019
    Wang, Xueyan
    Zhao, Li
    Su, Mengwei
    Li, Xiaoqing
    Chang, Xinhan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (35) : 84152 - 84166
  • [3] Study on the evolution and driving mechanism of land function in China from 2005 to 2019
    Xueyan Wang
    Li Zhao
    Mengwei Su
    Xiaoqing Li
    Xinhan Chang
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 84152 - 84166
  • [4] Assessing the coordination of ecological and agricultural goals during ecological restoration efforts: A case study of Wuqi County, Northwest China
    Zhang, Daojun
    Jia, Qiqi
    Xu, Xin
    Yao, Shunbo
    Chen, Haibin
    Hou, Xianhui
    Zhang, Jinting
    Jin, Gui
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2019, 82 : 550 - 562
  • [5] Spatiotemporal patterns and driving mechanism of tourism ecological security in Guangxi, China
    Liang, Yiqiao
    Liu, Hongying
    Chiaka, Jeffrey Chiwuikem
    Jiang, Chengtao
    Wei, Nannan
    Liang, Yihang
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2023, 11
  • [6] Evaluating the effectiveness of ecological restoration of hard bank rivers: a case study from Shedu river port, China
    Van Tai Tang
    Fu, Dafang
    Singh, Rajendra Prasad
    Rene, Eldon R.
    Tran Ngoc Binh
    Sharma, Anil Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER SUPPLY RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-AQUA, 2018, 67 (08): : 824 - 833
  • [7] The regulatory landscape of biosimilars: WHO efforts and progress made from 2009 to 2019
    Kang, Hye-Na
    Thorpe, Robin
    Knezevic, Ivana
    Rocha Zarate Blades, Carolina Damas
    Levano, Mary Casas
    Chew, Jing Yin
    Chilufya, Mumbi Bernice
    Chirachanakul, Parichard
    Chua, Hui Ming
    Farahani, Ali Vasheghani
    Ghobrial, Mariam Raouf Wefky
    Habahbeh, Suna
    Hamel, Hugo
    Kim, Gi Hyun
    Rodriguez, Violeta Perez
    Putri, Desi Eka
    Rodgers, Jacqueline
    Savkina, Maria
    Semeniuk, Oleh
    Srivastava, Shraddha
    Wadhwa, Meenu
    Yamaguchi, Teruhide
    [J]. BIOLOGICALS, 2020, 65 : 1 - 9
  • [8] Four-in-one Driving Mechanism Model of Ecological Civilization Construction in China
    Wu Shou-rong
    Wang Hua-rong
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION (6TH), VOL II, 2010, : 534 - 540
  • [9] Effectiveness assessment of China's coastal wetland ecological restoration: A meta-analysis
    Liu, Lerong
    Lin, Boding
    Fang, Qinhua
    Jiang, Xiaoyan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 934
  • [10] General trends in freshwater ecological restoration practice in China over the past two decades: the driving factors and the evaluation of restoration outcome
    Wu, Juan
    Dai, Yanran
    Cheng, Shuiping
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2020, 32 (01)