Optimal timing and neural loci: a scoping review on the effect of non-invasive brain stimulation on post-stroke gait and balance recovery

被引:8
|
作者
Parikh, Vyoma [1 ]
Medley, Ann [1 ]
Chung, Yu-Chen [2 ]
Goh, Hui-Ting [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Womans Univ, Sch Phys Therapy, 5500 Southwestern Med Ave, Dallas, TX 75235 USA
[2] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; walking; postural control; cerebrovascular accident; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; THETA BURST STIMULATION; LIMB MOTOR FUNCTION; SUBACUTE STROKE; CORTICAL CONTROL; CORTICOMOTOR EXCITABILITY; UNAFFECTED HEMISPHERE; POSTURAL STABILITY; WALKING; CORTEX;
D O I
10.1080/10749357.2021.1990467
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Little is known about the optimal timing and neural loci for applying noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to promote gait and balance recovery after stroke. Objective: To identify the optimal timing and neural loci of NIBS for gait and balance recovery after stroke. Methods: We performed a PubMed search using keywords of stroke, transcranial magnetic stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, NIBS, balance, and gait. Interventional trials with various designs published in English were selected. Both flowcharts and tables were used for the result presentation. Results: The majority of selected 31 studies included individuals with chronic stroke and primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation. Studies' quality ranged from 4 to 10 (max = 10) on the Pedro scale. NIBS led to improvements in gait and balance in individuals with chronic and subacute stroke, yet the evidence for the acute phase of stroke is limited. Further, stimulation over the ipsilesional M1 resulted in improvement in gait and balanced performance. Stimulation over non-motor regions such as the cerebellum has been limitedly explored. Conclusion: Current evidence supports the use of NIBS to the M1 in conjunction with behavioral training to improve gait and balance performance in individuals with subacute and chronic stroke. Future research is recommended to evaluate the effect of NIBS during acute stroke and over neural loci other than M1, and to implement a more rigorous method.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 100
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical Applications of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke Recovery: A Review of Current Evidence and Therapeutic Strategies
    Nicholas Aderinto
    Gbolahan Olatunji
    Emmanuel Kokori
    Chinonyelum Emmanuel Agbo
    Adetola Emmanuel Babalola
    John Ehi Aboje
    Edun Mariam Tolulope
    Anuoluwa Oyeboyin Oyelude
    Faith Adedayo Adejumo
    Current Treatment Options in Neurology, 2025, 27 (1)
  • [42] The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Post-stroke Spasticity: A Scoping Review
    Chasiotis, Athanasios
    Giannopapas, Vasileios
    Papadopoulou, Marianna
    Chondrogianni, Maria
    Stasinopoulos, Dimitrios
    Giannopoulos, Sotirios
    Bakalidou, Daphne
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [43] The Effect of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation on Gait in Healthy Young and Older Adults: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Baharlouei, Hamzeh
    Salehinejad, Mohammad Ali
    Talimkhani, Ailin
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 516 : 125 - 140
  • [44] What are the effects of pharmacological, non-invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, in the treatment of post-stroke depression? A Cochrane Review summary with commentary
    Sen, Ekin Ilke
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2024, 54 (03) : 505 - 508
  • [45] Combining Robot-Assisted Gait Training and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review
    Bressi, Federica
    Cinnera, Alex Martino
    Morone, Giovanni
    Campagnola, Benedetta
    Cricenti, Laura
    Santacaterina, Fabio
    Miccinilli, Sandra
    Zollo, Loredana
    Paolucci, Stefano
    Di Lazzaro, Vincenzo
    Sterzi, Silvia
    Bravi, Marco
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [46] Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Clinical Pain Intensity and Experimental Pain Sensitivity Among Individuals with Central Post-Stroke Pain: A Systematic Review
    Ramger, Benjamin Curtis
    Bader, Kimberly Anne
    Davies, Samantha Pauline
    Stewart, David Andrew
    Ledbetter, Leila Snow
    Simon, Corey Brae
    Feld, Jody Ann
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2019, 12 : 3319 - 3329
  • [47] Invasive brain stimulation therapies for Central Post-stroke pain: A Systematic Review and Narrative synthesis
    Mead, G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (01) : 76 - 76
  • [48] Enhancing non-invasive brain stimulation with non-invasively delivered nanoparticles for improving stroke recovery
    Hong, Y.
    Wang, J.
    Li, J.
    Xu, Z.
    Yang, X.
    Bai, M.
    Gong, P.
    Xie, Y.
    Zhang, X.
    Xu, P.
    Chen, X.
    Li, R.
    Liu, X.
    Ruan, G.
    Xu, G.
    MATERIALS TODAY CHEMISTRY, 2022, 26
  • [49] Facilitating Corticomotor Excitability of the Contralesional Hemisphere Using Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Improve Upper Limb Motor Recovery from Stroke-A Scoping Review
    Tam, Pui Kit
    Oey, Nicodemus Edrick
    Tang, Ning
    Ramamurthy, Guhan
    Chew, Effie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (15)
  • [50] The antalgic effects of non-invasive physical modalities on central post-stroke pain: a systematic review
    Chen, Chih-Chung
    Chuang, Yu-Fen
    Huang, Andrew Chih-Wei
    Chen, Chih-Kuang
    Chang, Ya-Ju
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2016, 28 (04) : 1368 - 1373