Risk prediction models in emergency surgery: Protocol for a scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Hansted, Anna K. [1 ,6 ]
Moller, Morten H. [2 ,3 ]
Moller, Ann M. [1 ,3 ]
Burcharth, Jakob [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Thorup, Sofie S. [1 ]
Vester-Andersen, Morten [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev Gentofte, Herlev Anaesthesia Crit & Emergency Care Sci Unit, ACES,Herlev Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Herlev, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Rigshospitalet, Dept Intens Care 4131, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev & Gentofte, Dept Gastrointestinal & Hepat Dis, Herlev, Denmark
[5] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Herlev & Gentofte, Emergency Surg Res Grp Copenhagen EMERGE Cph, Herlev, Denmark
[6] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Herlev Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Herlev Anaesthesia Crit & Emergency Care Sci Unit, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, DK-2730 Herlev, Denmark
关键词
emergency surgery; perioperative; risk; risk prediction; risk stratification; ASSESSMENT TOOLS; MORTALITY; VALIDATION; DERIVATION;
D O I
10.1111/aas.14383
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Risk prediction models are used for many purposes in emergency surgery, including critical care triage and benchmarking. Several risk prediction models have been developed, and some are used for purposes other than those for which they were developed. We aim to provide an overview of the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps. Methods: We will conduct a scoping review on risk prediction models used for patients undergoing emergency surgery in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will search Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library and include all study designs. We aim to answer the following questions: (1) What risk prediction models are used in emergency surgery? (2) Which variables are used in these models? (3) Which surgical specialties are the models used for? (4) Have the models been externally validated? (5) Where have the models been externally validated? (6) What purposes were the models developed for? (7) What are the strengths and limitations of the included models? We will summarize the results descriptively. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using a modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Conclusion: The outlined scoping review will summarize the existing literature on risk prediction models used in emergency surgery and highlight knowledge gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 581
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A scoping review of complication prediction models in spinal surgery: An analysis of model development, validation and impact
    Canturk, Toros C.
    Czikk, Daniel
    Wai, Eugene K.
    Phan, Philippe
    Stratton, Alexandra
    Michalowski, Wojtek
    Kingwell, Stephen
    NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2022, 11
  • [32] Systematic review of risk prediction models for diabetes after bariatric surgery
    Zhang, R.
    Borisenko, O.
    Telegina, I.
    Hargreaves, J.
    Ahmed, A. R.
    Sanchez Santos, R.
    Pring, C.
    Funch-Jensen, P.
    Dillemans, B.
    Hedenbro, J. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (11) : 1420 - 1427
  • [33] Study protocol for a scoping review of Lyme disease prediction methodologies
    Szaroz, Daniel
    Kulkarni, Manisha
    Gonzalez, Claudia Ximena Robayo
    Zinszer, Kate
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [34] Medical complexity in emergency and urgent care settings: a scoping review protocol
    Bele, Sumedh
    Chisolm, Cassandra
    Lategan, Conne
    Yakubets, Kate
    Lorenzetti, Diane
    Uwamahoro, Marie-Claire
    Popeski, Naomi
    Turin, Tanvir C.
    Lang, Eddy
    Rabi, Doreen
    BMJ OPEN, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [35] Examining Indigenous emergency care equity projects: a scoping review protocol
    Marchand, Tyara
    Daodu, Oluwatomilayo
    MacRobie, Ali
    Green-Dowden, Stephen
    Brindle, Mary
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [36] Pain experiences of marginalized children in the emergency department: A scoping review protocol
    Kammerer, Elise
    Elliott, Sarah A.
    Hartling, Lisa
    Basi, Calveen
    Dennett, Liz
    Khangura, Jaspreet K.
    Scott, Shannon D.
    Candelaria, Patricia
    Ruzycki, Shannon
    Ali, Samina
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (04):
  • [37] Multivariable prediction models for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review protocol
    Fields, Kara G.
    Ma, Jie
    Petrinic, Tatjana
    Alhassan, Hassan
    Eze, Anthony
    Reddy, Ankith
    Hedayat, Mona
    Providencia, Rui
    Lip, Gregory Y. H.
    Bedford, Jonathan P.
    Clifton, David A.
    Redfern, Oliver C.
    O'Brien, Benjamin
    Watkinson, Peter J.
    Collins, Gary S.
    Muehlschlegel, Jochen D.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (03):
  • [38] PREDICTION MODELS OF EARLY READMISSIONS IN CIRRHOSIS: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Rose, Peter D.
    Woodman, Richard J.
    Wigg, Alan J.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 78 : S1719 - S1720
  • [39] Costs, effects and implementation of routine data emergency admission risk prediction models in primary care for patients with, or at risk of, chronic conditions: a systematic review protocol
    Kingston, Mark Rhys
    Evans, Bridie Angela
    Nelson, Kayleigh
    Hutchings, Hayley
    Russell, Ian
    Snooks, Helen
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (03):
  • [40] Integrating physiotherapy into primary care models: A scoping review protocol
    Saddy, Nathaniel
    Aboosally, Aamir
    Aslanidis, Jordan
    Beilin, Anthony
    Schezar, Jessica da Silva
    Miller, Jordan
    Tawiah, Andrews K.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12):