Perspective of Construction Building Professionals on Low-Carbon Materials in Malaysia

被引:0
|
作者
Omar, Mohd Rohim [1 ]
Ayob, Afizah [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Zakaria, Mohd Hafiz [2 ]
Rahim, Nur Soleha Abdul [1 ]
Mokhtar, Hamizah [3 ]
Rani, Hafnidar A. [6 ]
Rahman, Farahiyah Abdul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Fac Civil Engn & Technol, Kompleks Pusat Pengajian Jejawi 3, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[2] Inst Engn Math, Pauh Putra Main Campus, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[3] Univ Teknol MARA, Coll Engn, Sch Civil Engn, UITM Pahang Branch, Bandar Tun Razak 26400, Pahang, Malaysia
[4] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Ctr Excellent Water Res & Environm Sustainabil Gro, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[5] Univ Malaysia Perlis, Fac Civil Engn & Technol, Res Cluster Construct Management Technol, Arau 02600, Perlis, Malaysia
[6] Univ Muhammadiyah Aceh, Engn Fac, Dept Civil Engn, Aceh 23245, Indonesia
关键词
Construction building professionals; Low carbon material; Perspective; Construction industry; Sustainable; EMBODIED ENERGY; EMISSIONS; FOOTPRINT; SECTOR;
D O I
10.21315/jcdc-04-22-0081
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Low-carbon (LC) materials and alternative technology must overcome various institutional policy and market constraints to gain greater acceptance in the construction sector. The primary impediments that must be addressed to build a viable and sustainable local construction sector are awareness and knowledge. To analyse the perspective on LC materials in the northern states of Malaysia, 93 companies were surveyed via their construction building professionals (CBPs) on awareness, usage frequency, user experience, drivers for material selection and barriers to LC material adoption in projects. To establish an understanding of CBPs and LC materials, survey data were analysed using semi-structured qualitative-quantitative approaches and the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), influenced by basic theory. 79.57% valid responses indicate that most participants had a low degree of awareness, with 95% confidence that there is no difference in the score levels of the overall viewpoints between architects, civil engineers and structural engineers. While unfired bricks (16.2%) are commonly and widely employed in construction projects, structural insulated panels (40.9%) are the most favourable LC materials for future projects. Client requirements, regulatory requirements and expectations of a shorter completion time are the most important factors driving CBPs to select LC materials, accounting for 44.6%, 37.8% and 37.8%, respectively. According to the CBPs, the main constraint factor to market acceptability is the "Lack of sustainable material information" (44.9%). The proposed recommendations include "Training on designing a building with LC material", "Clear regulation on limiting carbon emission in a project" and "Increase demonstration of projects and case studies" at a rate ranging from 36.5% to 43.2% to improve client and CBPs acceptance of LC materials for a more sustainable building sector.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 162
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Construction of Low-carbon Tourist Attractions Based on Low-carbon Economy
    Shi Changbo
    Peng Jingjing
    [J]. 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 : 759 - 762
  • [22] Systematic review on the integration of building information modelling and prefabrication construction for low-carbon building delivery
    Yevu, Sitsofe Kwame
    Owusu, Emmanuel Kingsford
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    Oti-Sarpong, Kwadwo
    Wuni, Ibrahim Yahaya
    Tetteh, Mershack Opoku
    [J]. BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2023, 51 (03): : 279 - 300
  • [23] Demystifying Low-Carbon Materials
    Oisik Das
    Ágoston Restás
    Vigneshwaran Shanmugam
    Gabriel Sas
    Michael Försth
    Qiang Xu
    Lin Jiang
    Mikael S. Hedenqvist
    Seeram Ramakrishna
    [J]. Materials Circular Economy, 2021, 3 (1):
  • [24] Regional Low-carbon Level Evaluation from an Industrial Low-carbon Perspective
    Geng, Shigang
    Meng, Weidong
    Sun, Shaochen
    Yi, Lili
    Qi, Haiyun
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENGINEERING, 2016, 51 : 997 - 1002
  • [25] MARKET ACCEPTANCE OF LOW-CARBON BUILDING MATERIALS - PART II: LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
    Doksanovic, Tihomir
    Farkas, Mario
    Njegovanovic, Natasa
    [J]. ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING OSIJEK-E-GFOS, 2013, 6 : 1 - +
  • [26] Explore on design strategy of green materials on building based on low-carbon background
    Ye, Jiangong
    [J]. ENERGY DEVELOPMENT, PTS 1-4, 2014, 860-863 : 1265 - 1269
  • [27] A Study on Building Energy Efficiency and Low-Carbon Building
    Wang Li
    [J]. RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY II, PTS 1-4, 2012, 512-515 : 2848 - 2853
  • [28] Construction of low-carbon city of Tianjin
    Qi Meishuai
    Sun Yu
    Yao Xiaodong
    [J]. URBANIZATION AND LAND RESERVATION RESEARCH, 2011, : 1 - +
  • [29] Study on Low-Carbon Building Ecological City Construction in Harmonious Beibu Gulf Culture
    Liu-Zhihong
    Yu-Jinhui
    Zhang-Deng
    [J]. 2011 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND INFORMATION APPLICATION TECHNOLOGY ESIAT 2011, VOL 10, PT C, 2011, 10 : 1881 - 1886
  • [30] Developing a low-carbon economy and constructing a low-carbon city-a Xuzhou perspective
    Zhang, W. Y.
    Zhou, C. L.
    Chen, F.
    Ma, J.
    [J]. CIVIL, ARCHITECTURE AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2017, : 1055 - 1059