Comparison between density gradient centrifugation method, an extended version of the horizontal swim up method and the combination of both for sperm selection

被引:0
|
作者
Jamil, Malak [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Debbarh, Hasnae [1 ]
Kabit, Amal [2 ,3 ]
Ennaji, Mohamed [2 ,3 ]
Koumba, Loic [1 ]
Kaarouch, Ismail [2 ,3 ]
Zarqaoui, Mohamed [2 ,3 ]
Senhaji, Wassim Rhazi [2 ,3 ]
Hissane, El Mehdi [2 ,3 ]
Saadani, Brahim [2 ,3 ]
Vanderzwalmen, Pierre [4 ]
Louanjli, Nourredine [2 ,3 ]
Cadi, Rachida [1 ]
机构
[1] HASSAN II Univ Casablanca, Ain Chock Fac Sci, Dept Biol, Lab Mol Genet Physiopathol & Biotechnol, Casablanca 20000, Morocco
[2] Labomac IVF Ctr, Casablanca, Morocco
[3] Clin Lab Med, Casablanca, Morocco
[4] IVF Ctr Prof Zech, Bregenz, Austria
关键词
Density gradient centrifugation (DGC); Extended horizontal swim up; DNA fragmentation; Chromatin decondensation; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; DNA FRAGMENTATION; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; SEMEN PARAMETERS; DAMAGE; QUALITY; ASSOCIATION; SPERMATOZOA; INDUCTION; INJECTION;
D O I
10.5468/ogs.22191eISSN2287-8580
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the degree of efficiency between density gradient centrifugation (DGC) method and an extended horizontal swim-up (SU) method. Methods A total of 97 couples undergoing in vitro fertilization were enrolled in the study. Semen samples were divided into three aliquots and treated using DGC, extended horizontal SU, and combined methods. DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were detected in native semen samples and their three corresponding aliquots. The corresponding mature oocytes of each semen sample were divided into two sibling cultures. The first sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from DGC, and the second sibling culture was microinjected with semen pellets from the combination of both methods. Fertilization rate and embryonic development were assessed at day 3. Results DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation was significantly low in DGC and extended horizontal SU samples; however, the rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation were significantly lower in extended horizontal SU samples than in DGC samples. The lowest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with both methods. The highest rates of DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation corresponded to the samples treated with DGC. No significant difference was found in the fertilization rate or day 3 embryos between sibling cultures. Conclusion The combination of DGC and the extended horizontal SU techniques is best for giving the lowest rates of sperm DNA fragmentation and chromatin decondensation.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 229
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swim-up method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNA anomalies
    Sakkas, D
    Manicardi, GC
    Tomlinson, M
    Mandrioli, M
    Bizzaro, D
    Bianchi, PG
    Bianchi, U
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (05) : 1112 - 1116
  • [32] COMPARISON OF A DISCONTINUOUS PERCOLL GRADIENT-METHOD VERSUS A SWIM-UP METHOD - EFFECTS ON SPERM MORPHOLOGY AND OTHER SEMEN PARAMETERS
    MENKVELD, R
    SWANSON, RJ
    KOTZE, TJV
    KRUGER, TF
    ANDROLOGIA, 1990, 22 (02) : 152 - 158
  • [33] The role of sperm selection in improving embryo euploidy rate: a comparison between Swim-up and Microfluidic Sperm Selection
    Paccagnini, D.
    Barberi, M.
    Nucera, C.
    Musella, M.
    Uva, D.
    Zazzaro, V.
    Listorti, I.
    Greco, E.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39
  • [34] Sperm Na+, K+-ATPase and Ca2+-ATPase Activity: A Preliminary Study of Comparison of Swim Up and Density Gradient Centrifugation Methods for Sperm Preparation
    Lestari, Silvia W.
    Larasati, Manggiasih D.
    Asmarinah
    Mansur, Indra G.
    2ND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERINGS RECENT PROGRESS IN BIOMATERIALS, DRUGS DEVELOPMENT, AND MEDICAL DEVICES, 2018, 1933
  • [35] Retrospective comparison of the semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination: Swim-up versus density gradient method
    Cil, Nazli
    Kabukcu, Cihan
    Cabus, Umit
    Turan, Tahir
    Mete, Culcin Abban
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 51 (03)
  • [36] Frequency of Sperm DNA Fragmentation According to Selection Method: Comparison and Relevance of a Microfluidic Device and a Swim-up Procedure
    Kishi, Kanako
    Ogata, Hiromi
    Ogata, Seiji
    Mizusawa, Yuri
    Okamoto, Eri
    Matsumoto, Yukiko
    Kokeguchi, Shoji
    Shiotani, Masahide
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2015, 9 (11) : QC14 - QC16
  • [37] COMPARISON OF THE INVITRO FERTILIZATION RATE BY HUMAN-SPERM CAPACITATED BY MULTIPLE-TUBE SWIM-UP AND PERCOLL GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION
    TANPHAICHITR, N
    AGULNICK, A
    SEIBEL, M
    TAYMOR, M
    JOURNAL OF IN VITRO FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYO TRANSFER, 1988, 5 (03): : 119 - 122
  • [38] A comparison between the Felix™ electrophoretic system of sperm isolation and conventional density gradient centrifugation: a multicentre analysis
    Shapouri, Farnaz
    Mahendran, Tara
    Govindarajan, Mirudhubashini
    Xie, Philip
    Kocur, Olena
    Palermo, Gianpiero D.
    Bakos, Hassan W.
    Ahlstroem, Aisling
    Caisander, Gunilla
    Xu, Bo
    Bai, Shun
    Lambourne, Sarah
    Aitken, R. John
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2023, 40 (01) : 83 - 95
  • [39] A comparison between the Felix™ electrophoretic system of sperm isolation and conventional density gradient centrifugation: a multicentre analysis
    Farnaz Shapouri
    Tara Mahendran
    Mirudhubashini Govindarajan
    Philip Xie
    Olena Kocur
    Gianpiero D. Palermo
    Hassan W. Bakos
    Aisling Ahlström
    Gunilla Caisander
    Bo Xu
    Shun Bai
    Sarah Lambourne
    R. John Aitken
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023, 40 : 83 - 95
  • [40] Does combining magnetic-activated cell sorting with density gradient or swim-up improve sperm selection?
    Zeynep Cakar
    Burcu Cetinkaya
    Duru Aras
    Betül Koca
    Sinan Ozkavukcu
    İskender Kaplanoglu
    Alp Can
    Ozgur Cinar
    Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2016, 33 : 1059 - 1065