Quality investment, inspection policy, and pricing decisions in a decentralized supply chain

被引:15
|
作者
Erkoc, Murat [1 ]
Gurnani, Haresh [2 ]
Ray, Saibal [3 ]
Jin, Mingzhu [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Coral Gables, FL USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Business, Winston Salem, NC 27106 USA
[3] McGill Univ, Desautels Fac Management, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Knoxville, TN USA
关键词
conformance quality; cost sharing; game theory; inspection; pricing; PRODUCT; COMPETITION; INCENTIVES; MANAGEMENT; CONTRACTS;
D O I
10.1111/poms.13831
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper studies the interaction between two key quality management decisions-input conformance quality and inspection policy-and related wholesale and retail prices in a two echelon supply chain. Market demand depends on the retail price as well as the end-product conformance quality, which itself depends on the input quality and the inspection scheme. Consistent with previous empirical findings in the literature, we show that an increase in quality does not always result in higher prices for consumers due to the cost-lowering effect of better quality. We also show that a lower input quality may still result in higher end-product quality because of how it might incentivize more and/or better inspection. Any interaction between input quality and inspection policy becomes more pronounced in the decentralized system due to incentive asymmetry between the channel partners. This makes the adoption of a full-inspection policy more likely there compared to an integrated system. Indeed, while vertical competition due to decentralization results in higher prices for customers, it can also result in better quality of end products. Another interesting finding in the decentralized setting is that, somewhat counterintuitively, a player may indeed opt to bear a higher share of the penalty for defective products sold to consumers resulting in higher profits for the player.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 226
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pricing and Service Quality Guarantee Decisions in Logistics Service Supply Chain with Fairness Concern
    Du, Ni
    Han, Qinglan
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2018, 35 (05)
  • [32] Pricing and carbon emission decisions in the assembly supply chain
    Chen, Weidong
    Han, Mingzhe
    Meng, Yue
    Bi, Jingyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 415
  • [33] Pricing decisions for a social comparison product supply chain
    Zhang, Mengyao
    Gou, Qinglong
    Yu, Lili
    Zhang, Juzhi
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2022, 168
  • [34] Pricing and effort decisions for a supply chain with uncertain information
    Chen, Lin
    Peng, Jin
    Liu, Zhibing
    Zhao, Ruiqing
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (01) : 264 - 284
  • [35] Pricing and service decisions of supply chain in an uncertain environment
    [J]. Sang, Shengju (sangshengju@163.com), 1600, International Association of Engineers (24):
  • [36] Pricing and investment decisions when facing heterogeneous customers under different supply chain power structures
    Andriani, Debrina Puspita
    Tseng, Fu-Shiang
    [J]. ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 78 : 390 - 405
  • [37] Dynamic innovation and pricing decisions in a supply-Chain
    Song, Jian
    Chutani, Anshuman
    Dolgui, Alexandre
    Liang, Liang
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 103
  • [38] Pricing and Service Decisions of Supply Chain in an Uncertain Environment
    Sang, Shengju
    [J]. ENGINEERING LETTERS, 2016, 24 (04) : 441 - 448
  • [39] PRICING AND INVESTMENT STRATEGY FOR DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY IN A SUPPLY CHAIN
    Hanh, Nguyen Thi My
    Chen, Jen-Ming
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2022, 26 (06): : 931 - 958
  • [40] Pricing decisions and social welfare in a supply chain with multiple competing retailers and carbon tax policy
    Zhou, Yanju
    Hu, Fengying
    Zhou, Zhenglong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 190 : 752 - 777