Assessing landslide susceptibility using combination models

被引:4
|
作者
Hong, Haoyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Dept Geog & Reg Res, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Landslide susceptibility modelling; Hoeffding tree; Combination models; Ensemble learning; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; MACHINE LEARNING-METHODS; HOA BINH PROVINCE; HYBRID INTEGRATION; RANDOM FOREST; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; STATISTICAL-METHODS; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FREQUENCY RATIO; ROTATION FOREST;
D O I
10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121288
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Assessing and mapping landslide susceptibility is a powerful approach to decrease the cost of landslide disasters. The aim of this paper is to design combination models by combining the Hoeffding tree and forest by penalizing attributes with MultiBoosting (MB), Random SubSpace (RS) and Rotation Forest (RF) to analyse the results of each combination model for modelling landslide susceptibilities. For this purpose, a case study was conducted in Yanshan County, Jiangxi Province, China. Then, 380 landslide polygons and eleven environmental variables were collected and processed, and they were the input data for the six combination models. The results demonstrated that the combined models performed well. Using validation data, the FPA-RF model obtained a maximum AUC value (0.794), followed by the FPA-RS (0.793), FPA-MB (0.788), VFDT-RF (0.746), VFDT-MB (0.741) and VFDT-RS (0.740) models. The FPA-RF model exhibited the most stable and accurate performance in this paper. Among the eleven environmental variables, aspect, land use, and altitude were the most important variables in the combination models. Therefore, the combination models we developed are useful tools that can decrease losses from landslide disasters.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessing the relationship between landslide susceptibility and land cover change using machine learning
    Nguyen, Huu Duy
    Vue, Tung Cong
    Bretcan, Petre
    Petrisor, Alexandru-Ionut
    VIETNAM JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 46 (03): : 339 - 359
  • [22] Assessing landslide susceptibility using Bayesian probability-based weight of evidence model
    Evangelin Ramani Sujatha
    P. Kumaravel
    G. Victor Rajamanickam
    Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2014, 73 : 147 - 161
  • [23] Assessing landslide susceptibility using Bayesian probability-based weight of evidence model
    Sujatha, Evangelin Ramani
    Kumaravel, P.
    Rajamanickam, G. Victor
    BULLETIN OF ENGINEERING GEOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 73 (01) : 147 - 161
  • [24] Techniques for evaluating the performance of landslide susceptibility models
    Frattini, Paolo
    Crosta, Giovanni
    Carrara, Alberto
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2010, 111 (1-4) : 62 - 72
  • [25] Application of Transformer Models to Landslide Susceptibility Mapping
    Bao, Shuai
    Liu, Jiping
    Wang, Liang
    Zhao, Xizhi
    SENSORS, 2022, 22 (23)
  • [26] Landslide susceptibility mapping using deep learning models in Ardabil province, Iran
    Hossein Hamedi
    Ali Asghar Alesheikh
    Mahdi Panahi
    Saro Lee
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2022, 36 : 4287 - 4310
  • [27] Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using Different GIS-Based Bivariate Models
    Nohani, Ebrahim
    Moharrami, Meisam
    Sharafi, Samira
    Khosravi, Khabat
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Binh Thai Pham
    Lee, Saro
    Melesse, Assefa M.
    WATER, 2019, 11 (07)
  • [28] Evaluating Landslide Susceptibility Using Sampling Methodology and Multiple Machine Learning Models
    Song, Yingze
    Yang, Degang
    Wu, Weicheng
    Zhang, Xin
    Zhou, Jie
    Tian, Zhaoxu
    Wang, Chencan
    Song, Yingxu
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [29] GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models
    Amin Salehpour Jam
    Jamal Mosaffaie
    Faramarz Sarfaraz
    Samad Shadfar
    Rouhangiz Akhtari
    Natural Hazards, 2021, 108 : 1025 - 1046
  • [30] Optimization of SVR and CatBoost models using metaheuristic algorithms to assess landslide susceptibility
    Rajendran Shobha Ajin
    Samuele Segoni
    Riccardo Fanti
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)