First-Line Lorlatinib Versus Crizotinib in ALK-Positive NSCLC: Japanese Subgroup Analysis of CROWN

被引:4
|
作者
Hayashi, Hidetoshi [1 ,11 ]
Teraoka, Shunsuke [2 ]
Goto, Yasushi [3 ]
Kumagai, Toru [4 ]
Nishio, Makoto [5 ]
Sugawara, Shunichi [6 ]
Oizumi, Satoshi [7 ]
Matsumura, Masakazu [8 ]
Okura, Masayuki [8 ]
Peltz, Gerson [9 ]
Kato, Terufumi [10 ]
机构
[1] Kindai Univ, Fac Med, Osaka, Japan
[2] Wakayama Med Univ, Wakayama, Japan
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Osaka Int Canc Inst, Osaka, Japan
[5] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Tokyo, Japan
[6] Sendai Kousei Hosp, Sendai, Japan
[7] Natl Hosp Org, Hokkaido Canc Ctr, Hokkaido, Japan
[8] Pfizer R&D Japan, Tokyo, Japan
[9] Pfizer Oncol, Groton, CT USA
[10] Kanagawa Canc Ctr, Yokohama, Japan
[11] Kindai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Med Oncol, 377-2 Ohno Higashi, Osaka 5898511, Japan
来源
JTO CLINICAL AND RESEARCH REPORTS | 2023年 / 4卷 / 04期
关键词
Anaplastic lymphoma kinase; Japan; Lorlatinib; Carcinoma; Non-small cell lung; CELL LUNG-CANCER; OPEN-LABEL; SINGLE-ARM; MULTICENTER; ALECTINIB;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtocrr.2023.100471
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK inhibitor, was found to have improved efficacy versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC in the ongoing, global, randomized, phase 3 CROWN study. Methods: The study's primary end point was progression -free survival assessed by blinded independent central re-view. Secondary end points included objective and intracra-nial response. Here, we report efficacy and safety data of the Japanese subgroup of the CROWN study (lorlatinib 100 mg once daily, n = 25; crizotinib 250 mg twice daily, n = 23). Results: Progression-free survival was not reached (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.3 mo-not reached) for lorlatinib and 11.1 months (95% CI: 5.4-14.8) for crizotinib (hazard ratio = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.19-1.01). Objective response (lor-latinib versus crizotinib) was 68.0% (95% CI: 46.5-85.1) versus 52.2% (95% CI: 30.6-73.2) in all patients, and intracranial response was 100.0% (three of three, 95% CI: 29.2-100.0) versus 28.6% (two of seven; 95% CI: 3.7-71.0) in patients with brain metastases at baseline. The most common adverse events with lorlatinib were hyper-triglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, and weight increase; 28.0% and 8.0% of patients had cognitive and mood effects (all grades 1 or 2), respectively. Lorlatinib was associated with more grade 3 or 4 events than crizotinib (80.0% versus 72.7%). Treatment was discontinued owing to adverse events in 16.0% and 27.3% of patients in the lor-latinib and crizotinib groups, respectively. Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of lorlatinib in the Japanese subgroup were similar to those in the CROWN global population, revealing improved outcomes versus crizotinib in Japanese patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND li-cense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/ 4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Even With the CROWN Findings, There Remain Multiple First-Line Treatment Options for Patients With Advanced ALK-Positive NSCLC
    Lam, Vincent K.
    Gadgeel, Shirish M.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2025, 20 (02) : 150 - 153
  • [22] First-line lorlatinib for advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer
    Lin, Jessica J.
    Gainor, Justin F.
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (04): : 302 - 304
  • [23] Alectinib can replace crizotinib as standard first-line therapy for ALK-positive lung cancer
    Uemura, Takehiro
    Hida, Toyoaki
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2017, 5 (21)
  • [24] Optimal management of ALK-positive NSCLC progressing on crizotinib
    Metro, Giulio
    Tazza, Marco
    Matocci, Roberta
    Chiari, Rita
    Crino, Lucio
    LUNG CANCER, 2017, 106 : 58 - 66
  • [25] Alectinib surpasses crizotinib for untreated ALK-positive NSCLC
    Gilbert, Judith A.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (07): : E377 - E377
  • [26] Crizotinib Versus Chemotherapy On ALK-positive NSCLC: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety
    Wang, Mingxia
    Wang, Guanqi
    Ma, Haiyan
    Shan, Baoen
    CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS, 2019, 19 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [27] First-Line Crizotinib in ALK-Positive Lung Cancer (vol 372, pg 781, 2015)
    Tural, Deniz
    Saadettin, Kilickap
    Akan, Ali
    Koksoy, Elif B.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (09): : 887 - 887
  • [28] Advanced ALK-positive lung cancer with lorlatinib versus crizotinib in Asian patients with brain metastases
    Shih-Chang, Hung
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2023, 30 (01)
  • [29] Continuation of Lorlatinib in ALK-Positive NSCLC Beyond Progressive Disease
    Ou, Sai-Hong, I
    Solomon, Benjamin J.
    Shaw, Alice T.
    Gadgeel, Shirish M.
    Besse, Benjamin
    Soo, Ross A.
    Abbattista, Antonello
    Toffalorio, Francesca
    Wiltshire, Robin
    Bearz, Alessandra
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 17 (04) : 568 - 577
  • [30] Alectinib in crizotinib-resistant, ALK-positive NSCLC
    Jassem, Jacek
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (02): : 134 - 135