Sex Differences in Mouse Cardiac Electrophysiology Revealed by Simultaneous Imaging of Excitation-Contraction Coupling

被引:2
|
作者
Emerson, James I. [1 ]
Ariel, Pablo [2 ]
Shi, Wei [3 ]
Conlon, Frank L. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Biochem & Biophys, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Microscopy Serv Lab, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, McAllister Heart Inst, Dept Biol & Genet, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Integrat Program Biol & Genome Sci, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
sex differences; cardiac electrophysiology; excitation-contraction coupling; INTRACELLULAR CA2+; GENDER-DIFFERENCES; QT-INTERVAL; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; VENTRICULAR MYOCYTES; RAT-HEART; CALCIUM; MECHANISMS; LONG; REPOLARIZATION;
D O I
10.3390/jcdd10120479
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Males and females differ in the basic anatomy and physiology of the heart. Sex differences are evident in cardiac repolarization in humans; women have longer corrected QT and JT intervals. However, the molecular mechanisms that lead to these differences are incompletely understood. Here, we present that, like in humans, sex differences in QT and JT intervals exist in mouse models; female mice had longer corrected QT and JT intervals compared with age-matched males. To further understand the molecular underpinning of these sex differences, we developed a novel technology using fluorescent confocal microscopy that allows the simultaneous visualization of action potential, Ca2+ transients, and contractions in isolated cardiomyocytes at a high temporal resolution. From this approach, we uncovered that females at baseline have increased action potential duration, decreased Ca2+ release and reuptake rates, and decreased contraction and relaxation velocities compared with males. Additionally, males had a shorter overall time from action potential onset to peak contraction. In aggregate, our studies uncovered male and female differences in excitation-contraction coupling that account for differences observed in the EKG. Overall, a better understanding of sex differences in electrophysiology is essential for equitably treating cardiac disease.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sex Differences in [beta]-Adrenergic Responsiveness of Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Isolated Rabbit Hearts
    Hoeker, Gregory
    Hood, Ashleigh
    Katra, Rodolphe
    Poelzing, Steven
    Pogwizd, Steven
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2014, 115
  • [32] Integrative Systems Models of Cardiac Excitation-Contraction Coupling
    Greenstein, Joseph L.
    Winslow, Raimond L.
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2011, 108 (01) : 70 - 84
  • [33] HYPERBARIC EXPOSURES ALTER CARDIAC EXCITATION-CONTRACTION COUPLING
    DOUBT, TJ
    EVANS, DE
    UNDERSEA BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, 1982, 9 (02): : 131 - 145
  • [34] Plasticity of excitation-contraction coupling in fish cardiac myocytes
    Vornanen, M
    Shiels, HA
    Farrell, AP
    COMPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY AND PHYSIOLOGY A-MOLECULAR & INTEGRATIVE PHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 132 (04): : 827 - 846
  • [35] ASPECTS UPON EXCITATION-CONTRACTION COUPLING IN CARDIAC MUSCLE
    EDMAN, KAP
    ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1969, S : 33 - &
  • [36] Models of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling in ventricular myocytes
    Williams, George S. B.
    Smith, Gregory D.
    Sobie, Eric A.
    Jafri, M. Saleet
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2010, 226 (01) : 1 - 15
  • [37] Regulation of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling: A cellular update
    Korzick, DH
    ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2003, 27 (04) : 192 - 200
  • [38] EXCITATION-CONTRACTION COUPLING IN CARDIAC-MUSCLE FIBER
    GILLIS, JM
    ANNALES DE CARDIOLOGIE ET D ANGEIOLOGIE, 1981, 30 (07): : 497 - 500
  • [39] Simulation of ATP metabolism in cardiac excitation-contraction coupling
    Matsuoka, S
    Sarai, N
    Jo, H
    Noma, A
    PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2004, 85 (2-3): : 279 - 299
  • [40] THEORY OF EXCITATION-CONTRACTION COUPLING IN CARDIAC-MUSCLE
    STERN, MD
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 63 (02) : 497 - 517