Clinical Linear Accelerator-Based Electron FLASH: Pathway for Practical Translation to FLASH Clinical Trials

被引:5
|
作者
No, Hyunsoo Joshua [1 ]
Wu, Yufan [1 ]
Dworkin, Michael Louis [1 ]
Manjappa, Rakesh [1 ]
Skinner, Lawrie [1 ]
Ashraf, M. Ramish [1 ]
Lau, Brianna [1 ]
Melemenidis, Stavros [1 ]
Viswanathan, Vignesh [1 ]
Yu, Amy Shu-Jung [1 ]
Surucu, Murat [1 ]
Schuler, Emil [2 ]
Graves, Edward Elliot [1 ,3 ]
Maxim, Peter Gregor [4 ]
Loo Jr, Billy W. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Div Radiat Oncol, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford Canc Inst, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiat Oncol, Orange, CA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
DOSE-RATE; RADIATION DELIVERY; BEAM DOSIMETRY; IRRADIATION; THERAPY; MICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.04.011
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Ultrahigh-dose-rate (UHDR) radiation therapy (RT) has produced the FLASH effect in preclinical models: reduced toxicity with comparable tumor control compared with conventional-dose-rate RT. Early clinical trials focused on UHDR RT feasibility using specialized devices. We explore the technical feasibility of practical electron UHDR RT on a standard clinical linear accelerator (LINAC).Methods and Materials: We tuned the program board of a decommissioned electron energy for UHDR electron delivery on a clinical LINAC without hardware modification. Pulse delivery was controlled using the respiratory gating interface. A short source-to-surface distance (SSD) electron setup with a standard scattering foil was configured and tested on an anthropomorphic phantom using circular blocks with 3-to 20-cm field sizes. Dosimetry was evaluated using radiochromic film and an ion chamber profiler.Results: UHDR open-field mean dose rates at 100, 80, 70, and 59 cm SSD were 36.82, 59.52, 82.01, and 112.83 Gy/s, respectively. At 80 cm SSD, mean dose rate was similar to 60 Gy/s for all collimated field sizes, with an R80 depth of 6.1 cm corresponding to an energy of 17.5 MeV. Heterogeneity was <5.0% with asymmetry of 2.2% to 6.2%. The short SSD setup was feasible under realistic treatment conditions simulating broad clinical indications on an anthropomorphic phantom.Conclusions: Short SSD and tuning for high electron beam current on a standard clinical LINAC can deliver flat, homogenous UHDR electrons over a broad, clinically relevant range of field sizes and depths with practical working distances in a configuration easily reversible to standard clinical use. (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 492
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical LINAC-Based Electron FLASH: Pathway for Practical Translation to Trials of FLASH Radiotherapy
    No, H. J.
    Wu, Y. F.
    Dworkin, M. L.
    Ashraf, R.
    Manjappa, R.
    Skinner, L.
    Lau, B.
    Melemenidis, S.
    Viswanathan, V.
    Yu, S. J.
    Surucu, M.
    Schueler, E.
    Graves, E. E.
    Maxim, P. G.
    Loo, B. W., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E539 - E539
  • [2] Flash Electron Beam Irradiation Using a Modified Clinical Linear Accelerator
    Cho, G.
    Kim, K. B.
    Jang, W. I.
    Yang, K. M.
    Lee, S. S.
    Kim, J. H.
    Kim, G. B.
    Yang, T. K.
    Choi, S. H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 51 (10) : 7802 - 7802
  • [3] Technical Infrastructure for Clinical Translation of Electron FLASH
    Ashraf, M. R.
    Skinner, L.
    Melemenidis, S.
    Dworkin, M. L.
    Wu, Y. F.
    No, H. J.
    Manjappa, R.
    Yu, S. J.
    Surucu, M.
    Graves, E. E.
    Maxim, P. G.
    Loo, B. W., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E639 - E639
  • [4] FLASH Clinical Trials
    Breneman, John
    Perentesis, John P.
    Bradley, Jeffrey
    Mascia, Anthony
    Abel, Eric
    Sharda, Agam
    Khuntia, Deepak
    Sharma, Ricky A.
    Simone, Charles B., II
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 110 (05):
  • [5] A roadmap to clinical trials for FLASH
    Taylor, Paige A.
    Moran, Jean M.
    Jaffray, David A.
    Buchsbaum, Jeffrey C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : 4099 - 4108
  • [6] FLASH Clinical Trials Reply
    Buchsbaum, Jeffrey C.
    Coleman, C. Norman
    Capala, Jacek
    Obcemea, Ceferino
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 110 (05):
  • [7] Treatment Planning System for Clinical Translation of Electron FLASH Radiotherapy
    Rahman, M.
    Ashraf, M. R.
    Gladstone, D. J.
    Bruza, P.
    Jarvis, L. A.
    Schaner, P. E.
    Cao, X.
    Pogue, B. W.
    Hoopes, P. J.
    Zhang, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : S31 - S31
  • [8] Towards clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy
    Marie-Catherine Vozenin
    Jean Bourhis
    Marco Durante
    Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2022, 19 : 791 - 803
  • [9] Towards clinical translation of FLASH radiotherapy
    Vozenin, Marie-Catherine
    Bourhis, Jean
    Durante, Marco
    NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 19 (12) : 791 - 803
  • [10] Comparison of Two Modified Linear Accelerators for Use in FLASH Clinical Trials
    Sloop, A.
    Sunnerberg, J.
    Bruza, P.
    Gladstone, D. J.
    Jarvis, L. A.
    Thomas, C. R., Jr.
    Pogue, B. W.
    Zhang, R.
    Rahman, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E539 - E540