The content and characteristics of face-to-face interventions to encourage patients' enrollment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review

被引:0
|
作者
Rasmussen, Birgit [1 ,5 ]
Maribo, Thomas [2 ,3 ]
Toft, Bente Skovsby [4 ]
机构
[1] Horsens Reg Hosp, Dept Physio & Occupat Therapy, Horsens, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Aarhus, Denmark
[3] Corp Qual, DEFACTUM Social & Hlth Serv & Labour Market, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Res Ctr Patient Involvement, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Horsens Reg Hosp, Dept Physio & Occupat Therapy, Sundvej 30, DK-8700 Horsens, Denmark
关键词
Ischemic heart disease; cardiac rehabilitation; enrollment; person-centered; face-to-face interventions; ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; HEALTH-CARE; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; REFERRAL STRATEGIES; PARTICIPATION; ATTENDANCE; PROGRAM; CENTEREDNESS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2023.2236014
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
PurposeTo provide an overview of the content and characteristics of face-to-face interventions to encourage enrollment in exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR).MethodsFollowing a published protocol describing the methods, six databases were searched. The search was limited to studies published from January 2000 to December 2021. Two reviewers independently performed study selection and data extraction.Results5583 studies were identified and 20 studies with a variety of study designs met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies specified important content in face-to-face interventions to be: Education, problem-solving, support of autonomy, exploring reasons for change, emotional and cognitive support while showing understanding. Studies targeting patients' experiences used motivational interviewing and addressed worries and anticipated difficulties. Intention to attend, CR barriers, practical barriers, exercise self-efficacy, and patients asking questions supported enrollment. Reassurance could lead to nonattendance if patients had a high degree of worry and distress.ConclusionFace-to-face interventions are important to support patients' enrollment in CR and should integrate a person-centered dialogue exploring reasons for change and providing support to overcome barriers. Focus on the patients' perspectives, the mechanisms of change, and the evaluation of the intervention to inform implementation should be further explored.
引用
收藏
页码:2734 / 2746
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Telerehabilitation versus face-to-face rehabilitation in the management of musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Krzyzaniak, Natalia
    Cardona, Magnolia
    Peiris, Ruwani
    Michaleff, Zoe A.
    Greenwood, Hannah
    Clark, Justin
    Scott, Anna Mae
    Glasziou, Paul
    PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS, 2023, 28 (02) : 71 - 87
  • [22] A review of the cost-effectiveness of face-to-face behavioural interventions for smoking, physical activity, diet and alcohol
    Gordon, L.
    Graves, N.
    Hawkes, A.
    Eakin, E.
    CHRONIC ILLNESS, 2007, 3 (02) : 101 - 129
  • [23] Cochrane Review Summary: face-to-face interventions for informing or educating parents about early childhood vaccination
    Trivedi, Daksha
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 15 (04): : 339 - 341
  • [24] Blending Face-to-Face and Internet-Based Interventions for the Treatment of Mental Disorders in Adults: Systematic Review
    Erbe, Doris
    Eichert, Hans-Christoph
    Riper, Heleen
    Ebert, David Daniel
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (09)
  • [25] Attrition from Face-to-Face Pediatric Outpatient Chronic Pain Interventions: A Narrative Review and Theoretical Model
    Tiong, Kristen
    Palmer, Greta M.
    Jaaniste, Tiina
    CHILDREN-BASEL, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [26] Barriers physicians face when referring patients to cardiac rehabilitation: a narrative review
    Elsakr, Carol
    Bulger, David A.
    Roman, Sherif
    Kirolos, Irene
    Khouzam, Rami N.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (17)
  • [27] Online and face-to-face extended brief interventions for harmful alcohol use: client characteristics, attendance and treatment outcomes
    Frings, Daniel
    Hogan, Cassandra J.
    Jn-Pierre, Kerlin H.
    Wood, Kerry V.
    Holmes, Mark
    Albery, Ian P.
    COUNSELLING PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2020, 33 (03) : 415 - 426
  • [28] Virtual clinics versus face-to-face review: Is the benefit the same for new orthopaedic patients?
    Shammout, Sarah
    Wall, Rosemary
    Murphy, Philip N.
    Jain, Kowshik
    HEALTH POLICY, 2022, 126 (07) : 688 - 692
  • [29] Telerehabilitation service impact on physical function and adherence compared to face-to-face rehabilitation in patients with stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sharififar, Sharareh
    Ghasemi, Hanieh
    Geis, Carolyn
    Azari, Hassan
    Adkins, Lauren
    Speight, Bailey
    Vincent, Heather K.
    PM&R, 2023, 15 (12) : 1654 - 1672
  • [30] What is the efficacy and effectiveness of telemedicine intervention for deaf signing populations in comparison to face-to-face interventions? A systematic review
    Katherine Rogers
    Karina Lovell
    Alys Young
    BMC Health Services Research, 23