Agricultural water-saving potentials with water footprint benchmarking under different tillage practices for crop production in an irrigation district

被引:7
|
作者
Gao, Jie [1 ]
Zhuo, La [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Duan, Ximing [1 ]
Wu, Pute [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Agr Univ, Coll Urban & Rural Construct, Taigu 030801, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Water saving Agr Arid Reg China, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[5] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid Area, Minist Educ, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
关键词
Irrigation techniques; Irrigation strategies; Water footprint; Benchmarking; Water-saving potential; EFFICIENCY; REDUCTION; GREEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108274
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The water footprint (WF) of crop production is a measure of the volumes of blue water (irrigation water) and green water (effective precipitation) consumed during crop growth. Setting the WF benchmarks of crop pro-duction in an irrigation district, exploring the optimal tillage practices, and clearly specifying blue and green water-saving potentials (WSPs) are essential for efficient utilization and reasonable allocation of agricultural water resources. However, related studies disregarded the WF benchmark setting according to tillage practices and the corresponding WSPs at the irrigation district scale. Meanwhile, the evaluation of WSP is limited to blue water. Considering summer maize and winter wheat grown in Baojixia Irrigation District (BID) of Shaanxi Province in China as the study case, this study aims to evaluate the gross irrigation WSP, actual blue and green WSPs based on crop WF simulation and WF benchmark setting for the "best" tillage practice. Eighteen water -saving tillage practice scenarios were set considering three irrigation techniques, three irrigation strategies, and two mulching practices. Results show that crop responses to different tillage practices differ. Maize WF has low sensitivity whereas wheat WF shows a significant difference following a change in irrigation techniques. In the practice under 40% deficit irrigation with no mulching, there is the highest actual WSPs, but at the cost of at least 57% reduction in crop yield. Whereas the practice of 20% deficit irrigation, furrow irrigation, and mulching has no yield reduction and relatively low WF, which can save 20% blue water and 8-12% green water in the BID, which is the optimal balance point between the yield and water consumption of the two crops. From the perspective of crop WF, this study quantified the agricultural WSPs of different water resources, and formulated a method for evaluating agricultural WSPs based on set WF benchmarks, to provide reference for building a water -saving culture, and sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Water footprint in wheat production under conservation tillage
    Nasseri, Abolfazl
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2023, 69 (14) : 3362 - 3374
  • [22] Vulnerability of crop water footprint in rain-fed and irrigation agricultural production system under future climate scenarios
    Jiang, Tingting
    Sun, Shikun
    Li, Zheng
    Li, Qian
    Lu, Yejia
    Li, Chong
    Wang, Yubao
    Wu, Pute
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2022, 326
  • [23] Economic assessment of water-saving irrigation management techniques and continuous flooded irrigation in different rice production systems
    Ishfaq, Muhammad
    Akbar, Nadeem
    Zulfiqar, Usman
    Ali, Nauman
    Shah, Fahimuddin
    Anjum, Shakeel Ahmad
    Farooq, Muhammad
    [J]. PADDY AND WATER ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 20 (01) : 37 - 50
  • [24] The effect of different agricultural management practices on irrigation efficiency, water use efficiency and green and blue water footprint
    La ZHUO
    Arjen Y.HOEKSTRA
    [J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2017, 4 (02) : 185 - 194
  • [25] Economic assessment of water-saving irrigation management techniques and continuous flooded irrigation in different rice production systems
    Muhammad Ishfaq
    Nadeem Akbar
    Usman Zulfiqar
    Nauman Ali
    Fahimuddin Shah
    Shakeel Ahmad Anjum
    Muhammad Farooq
    [J]. Paddy and Water Environment, 2022, 20 : 37 - 50
  • [26] Deficit Irrigation and Arbuscular Mycorrhiza as a Water-Saving Strategy for Eggplant Production
    Badr, M. A.
    El-Tohamy, W. A.
    Abou-Hussein, S. D.
    Gruda, N. S.
    [J]. HORTICULTURAE, 2020, 6 (03) : 1 - 17
  • [27] RESPONSES OF SHALLOW GROUNDWATER SYSTEM TO DIFFERENT WATER-SAVING PRACTICES IN TYPICAL IRRIGATION AREA IN NORTHWEST CHINA
    Dai, Fenggang
    Fu, Xiaogang
    Cai, Huanjie
    He, Jianqiang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 19 (09): : 1583 - 1592
  • [28] Rice evapotranspiration at the field and canopy scales under water-saving irrigation
    Liu, Xiaoyin
    Xu, Junzeng
    Yang, Shihong
    Zhang, Jiangang
    [J]. METEOROLOGY AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS, 2018, 130 (02) : 227 - 240
  • [29] An assessment of the role of ponds in the adoption of water-saving irrigation practices in the Zhanghe Irrigation System, China
    Mushtaq, Shahbaz
    Dawe, David
    Lin, Hong
    Moya, Piedad
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2006, 83 (1-2) : 100 - 110
  • [30] Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions and reduced irrigation water use in rice production through water-saving irrigation scheduling, reduced tillage and fertiliser application strategies
    Faiz-ul Islam, Syed
    Sander, Bjoern Ole
    Quilty, James R.
    de Neergaard, Andreas
    van Groenigen, Jan Willem
    Jensen, Lars Stoumann
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 739