Agricultural water-saving potentials with water footprint benchmarking under different tillage practices for crop production in an irrigation district

被引:7
|
作者
Gao, Jie [1 ]
Zhuo, La [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Duan, Ximing [1 ]
Wu, Pute [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Agr Univ, Coll Urban & Rural Construct, Taigu 030801, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[3] Northwest A&F Univ, Inst Water saving Agr Arid Reg China, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci & Minist Water Resources, Inst Soil & Water Conservat, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
[5] Northwest A&F Univ, Key Lab Agr Soil & Water Engn Arid Area, Minist Educ, Yangling 712100, Peoples R China
关键词
Irrigation techniques; Irrigation strategies; Water footprint; Benchmarking; Water-saving potential; EFFICIENCY; REDUCTION; GREEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108274
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The water footprint (WF) of crop production is a measure of the volumes of blue water (irrigation water) and green water (effective precipitation) consumed during crop growth. Setting the WF benchmarks of crop pro-duction in an irrigation district, exploring the optimal tillage practices, and clearly specifying blue and green water-saving potentials (WSPs) are essential for efficient utilization and reasonable allocation of agricultural water resources. However, related studies disregarded the WF benchmark setting according to tillage practices and the corresponding WSPs at the irrigation district scale. Meanwhile, the evaluation of WSP is limited to blue water. Considering summer maize and winter wheat grown in Baojixia Irrigation District (BID) of Shaanxi Province in China as the study case, this study aims to evaluate the gross irrigation WSP, actual blue and green WSPs based on crop WF simulation and WF benchmark setting for the "best" tillage practice. Eighteen water -saving tillage practice scenarios were set considering three irrigation techniques, three irrigation strategies, and two mulching practices. Results show that crop responses to different tillage practices differ. Maize WF has low sensitivity whereas wheat WF shows a significant difference following a change in irrigation techniques. In the practice under 40% deficit irrigation with no mulching, there is the highest actual WSPs, but at the cost of at least 57% reduction in crop yield. Whereas the practice of 20% deficit irrigation, furrow irrigation, and mulching has no yield reduction and relatively low WF, which can save 20% blue water and 8-12% green water in the BID, which is the optimal balance point between the yield and water consumption of the two crops. From the perspective of crop WF, this study quantified the agricultural WSPs of different water resources, and formulated a method for evaluating agricultural WSPs based on set WF benchmarks, to provide reference for building a water -saving culture, and sustainable development.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of development in water-saving irrigation techniques on spatial-temporal variations in crop water footprint and benchmarking
    Wang, Wei
    Zhuo, La
    Li, Meng
    Liu, Yili
    Wu, Pute
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 577
  • [2] Water-saving and Production-increasing Effects of Different Tillage Methods for Wheat Field in Channel Irrigation District of Haihe Lowland Plain
    Yin, Bao-zhong
    Zhen, Wen-chao
    Ma, Yan-hui
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WATER RESOURCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION WREP 2014, 2014, : 45 - 57
  • [3] AGRICULTURAL WATER-SAVING POTENTIAL FOR GUANZHONG IRRIGATION AREAS UNDER DIFFERENT GUARANTEED RATES OF PRECIPITATION
    Yin, J.
    Fu, Q.
    Xing, Z. X.
    Lu, Y.
    Ou, Z. F.
    [J]. APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 15 (04): : 1255 - 1274
  • [4] The impacts of interannual climate variability and agricultural inputs on water footprint of crop production in an irrigation district of China
    Sun, Shikun
    Wu, Pute
    Wang, Yubao
    Zhao, Xining
    Liu, Jing
    Zhang, Xiaohong
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 444 : 498 - 507
  • [5] Water-Saving Potential of Different Agricultural Management Practices in an Arid River Basin
    Zhang, Wang
    Tian, Yong
    Feng, Yu
    Liu, Jie
    Zheng, Chunmiao
    [J]. WATER, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [6] Agricultural water-saving and sustainable groundwater management in Shijiazhuang Irrigation District, North China Plain
    Hu, Yukun
    Moiwo, Juana Paul
    Yang, Yonghui
    Han, Shumin
    Yang, Yanmin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2010, 393 (3-4) : 219 - 232
  • [7] Research on Agricultural Water-Saving Irrigation Engineering in Shandong Province
    He, Fangding
    Tao, Xiuyu
    Xiang, Dong
    Wang, Aiwen
    [J]. Resilient Railroad Materials and Structures to Mitigate Climate Change, 2016, (268): : 71 - 75
  • [8] Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation on Hydrological Cycle in an Irrigation District of Northern China
    Zhang, Manfei
    Wang, Xiao
    Zhou, Weibo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [9] Precision irrigation perspectives on the sustainable water-saving of field crop production in China: Water demand prediction and irrigation scheme optimization
    Peng, Yaoqi
    Xiao, Yingxin
    Fu, Zetian
    Dong, Yuhong
    Zheng, Yongjun
    Yan, Haijun
    Li, Xinxing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 230 : 365 - 377
  • [10] Crop Production, Export of Virtual Water and Water-saving Strategies in Arizona
    Bae, Jinwon
    Dall'erba, Sandy
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 146 : 148 - 156