Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improves patient outcomes in free flap surgery for head and neck cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Nieminen, Teija [1 ,2 ,4 ,7 ]
Tapiovaara, Laura [3 ]
Back, Leif [3 ,4 ]
Lindford, Andrew [4 ,5 ]
Lassus, Patrik [4 ,5 ]
Lehtonen, Lasse [4 ,6 ]
Makitie, Antti [3 ,4 ,7 ]
Keski-Santti, Harri [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, HUS, Dept Perioperat & Intens Care Med, POB 340,Haartmaninkatu 4, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[2] Helsinki Univ Hosp, HUS, POB 340,Haartmaninkatu 4, Helsinki 00029, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Univ Helsinki, Dept Plast Surg, Helsinki, Finland
[6] Univ Helsinki, HUS Diagnost Ctr, Helsinki, Finland
[7] Univ Helsinki, Fac Med, Res Program Syst Oncol, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
ERAS; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Head and neck cancer; Free flap surgery; Microvascular reconstruction; FREE TISSUE TRANSFER; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MAJOR HEAD; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; RECONSTRUCTION; PROPHYLAXIS; OPERATIONS; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00405-023-08292-3
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Background In recent years, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines have been developed to optimize pre-, intra-, and postoperative care of surgical oncology patients. The aim of this study was to compare management outcome of patients undergoing head and neck cancer (HNC) surgery with free flap reconstruction at our institution before and after the implementation of the ERAS guidelines.Methods This retrospective study comprised 283 patients undergoing HNC surgery with free flap reconstruction between 2013 and 2020. Patients operated before and after the implementation of the ERAS protocol in October 2017 formed the pre-ERAS group (n = 169), and ERAS group (n = 114), respectively.Results In the pre-ERAS group the mean length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit length of the stay (ICU-LOS) were 20 days (range 7-79) and 6 days (range 1-32), and in the ERAS group 13 days (range 3-70) and 5 days (range 1-24), respectively. Both LOS (p < 0.001) and ICU-LOS (p = 0.042) were significantly reduced in the ERAS group compared to the pre-ERAS group. There were significantly fewer medical complications in the ERAS group (p < 0.003). No difference was found between the study groups in the surgical complication rate or in the 30-day or 6-month mortality rate after surgery.Conclusions We found reduced LOS, ICU-LOS, and medical complication rate, but no effect on the surgical complication rate after implementation of the ERAS guidelines, which supports their use in major HNC surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 914
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Standardisation of care improves patient outcomes
    Pico, Julien
    Sola, Chrystelle
    Saour, Anne Charlotte
    Chapron, Kevin
    Coruble, Lucie
    Bringuier, Sophie
    Dadure, Christophe
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (05)
  • [22] CORRELATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) GUIDELINES AND PATIENT OUTCOMES IN GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY
    Iniesta, M.
    Lasala, J.
    Rodriguez-Restrepo, A.
    Corzo, C.
    Siverand, A.
    Suki, T.
    Salvo, G.
    Munsell, M.
    Meyer, L.
    Ramirez, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2018, 28 : 62 - 62
  • [23] Early implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) protocol - Compliance improves outcomes: A prospective cohort study
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Kisialeuski, Mikhail
    Wierdak, Mateusz
    Stanek, Maciej
    Natkaniec, Michal
    Matlok, Maciej
    Major, Piotr
    Malczak, Piotr
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 21 : 75 - 81
  • [24] IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROTOCOL IN A BARIATRIC SURGERY UNIT Enhanced recovery in bariatric surgery
    Navarro Martinez, S.
    Sebastian Tomas, J. C.
    Diez Ares, J. A.
    Peris Tomas, N.
    Perianez Gomez, D.
    Martinez Mas, E.
    Trullenque Juan, R.
    Armananzas Villena, E.
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 : 578 - 578
  • [25] Complications and outcome after free flap surgery for cancer of the head and neck
    Lahtinen, S.
    Koivunen, P.
    Ala-Kokko, T.
    Kaarela, O.
    Ohtonen, P.
    Laurila, P.
    Liisanantti, J. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 56 (08): : 684 - 691
  • [26] Implementation and Outcomes of ERAS Protocol for Major Oncologic Head and Neck Surgery
    Murr, Alexander T.
    Sweeney, Craig
    Lenze, Nicholas R.
    Farquhar, Douglas R.
    Hackman, Trevor G.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2024, 134 (02): : 732 - 740
  • [27] Positive effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in DIEP flap breast reconstruction
    Gort, N.
    van Gaal, B. G., I
    Tielemans, H. J. P.
    Ulrich, D. J. O.
    Hummelink, S.
    BREAST, 2021, 60 : 53 - 57
  • [28] Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Mavrikis, Judene
    Witowski, Jan
    Adamos, Alexandros
    Major, Piotr
    Nowakowski, Michal
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 35 (06)
  • [29] Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery
    Michał Pędziwiatr
    Judene Mavrikis
    Jan Witowski
    Alexandros Adamos
    Piotr Major
    Michał Nowakowski
    Andrzej Budzyński
    Medical Oncology, 2018, 35
  • [30] Moving to a more restrictive transfusion protocol: Outcomes in head and neck free flap surgery
    Skoog, Hunter
    Chisolm, Paul
    Altonji, Samuel J.
    Moore, Lindsay
    Carroll, William R.
    Richman, Joshua
    Greene, Benjamin
    Grayson, Jessica W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2022, 43 (01)