Comparison of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®)-29 and PROMIS global physical and mental health scores

被引:1
|
作者
Hays, Ron D. [1 ]
Herman, Patricia M. [2 ]
Rodriguez, Anthony [3 ]
Edelen, Maria Orlando [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med & Hlth Serv Res, 1100 Glendon Ave,Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] RAND Corp, Behav & Policy Sci, 1776 Main St, Santa Monica, CA 90401 USA
[3] RAND Corp, Behav & Policy Sci, 20 Pk Plaza 920, Boston, MA 02116 USA
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Value & Experience PROVE Ctr, Patient Reported Outcomes, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Physical health; Mental health; Convergent validity; PROMIS (R); QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SHORT-FORM; VALIDATION; VARIABLES;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-023-03559-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement and Information System (PROMIS (R)): includes the PROMIS-29 physical and mental health summary and the PROMIS global physical and mental health scores. It is unknown how these scores coincide with one another. This study examines whether the scores yield similar or different information.Methods The PROMIS-29 and the PROMIS global health items were administered to 5804 adults from Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk) in 2021-2022 and to 4060 adults in the Ipsos KnowledgePanel (KP) in 2022.Results The median age of those in MTurk (KP) was 36 (54) and 53% (50%) were male. Mean T-scores on the PROMIS-29 and PROMIS global physical health scales were similar, but PROMIS global mental health was 3-4 points lower than the PROMIS-29 mental health summary score. Product-moment correlations ranged from 0.69 to 0.81 between the PROMIS-29 physical health and PROMIS global physical health scales and 0.56-0.69 between the mental health scales. Multi-trait multimethod analyses indicated that only a small proportion of the correlations between the two methods of measuring mental health were significantly more highly correlated with one another than correlations between physical and mental health.Conclusions PROMIS-29 and PROMIS global mental health scales provide different information and, therefore, study conclusions may vary depending on which measure is used. Interpretation of results needs to consider that the PROMIS-29 mental health scale is a weighted combination of specific domains while the PROMIS global mental health scale is based on general mental health perceptions. Further comparisons of methods of assessing mental health are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 744
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing
    Elizabeth A. Hahn
    Robert F. DeVellis
    Rita K. Bode
    Sofia F. Garcia
    Liana D. Castel
    Susan V. Eisen
    Hayden B. Bosworth
    Allen W. Heinemann
    Nan Rothrock
    David Cella
    Quality of Life Research, 2010, 19 : 1035 - 1044
  • [32] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS): USING NEW THEORY AND TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE MEASUREMENT OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
    Czajkowski, Susan M.
    Riley, William
    Pilkonis, Paul A.
    Weinfurt, Kevin P.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2011, 41 : S145 - S145
  • [33] Interpretation Of Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) By Rheumatologists
    Nagaraja, Vivek
    Fox, David A.
    Francis, Sheeja
    Singer, Ora
    Khanna, Puja
    Laing, Timothy
    Marks, Rory
    Monrad, Seetha U.
    Ognenovski, Vladimir M.
    Phillips, Kristine
    Khanna, Dinesh
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2013, 65 : S813 - S813
  • [34] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS): USING NEW THEORY AND TECHNOLOGY TO IMPROVE MEASUREMENT OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN CLINICAL RESEARCH
    Czajkowski, Susan M.
    Cella, David
    Stone, Arthur A.
    Amtmann, Dagmar
    Keefe, Francis
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2010, 39 : 46 - 46
  • [35] Measuring social health in the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): item bank development and testing
    Hahn, Elizabeth A.
    DeVellis, Robert F.
    Bode, Rita K.
    Garcia, Sofia F.
    Castel, Liana D.
    Eisen, Susan V.
    Bosworth, Hayden B.
    Heinemann, Allen W.
    Rothrock, Nan
    Cella, David
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (07) : 1035 - 1044
  • [36] Language and age equivalence in the patient-reported outcomes information system (PROMIS®) physical functioning items
    Paz, Sylvia H.
    Spritzer, Karen L.
    Morales, Leo
    Hays, Ronald D.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2012, 21 : 116 - 116
  • [37] LANGUAGE AND AGE EQUIVALENCE IN THE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS®) PHYSICAL FUNCTIONING ITEMS
    Paz, S. H.
    Spritzer, K.
    Morales, L.
    Hays, R. D.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 386 - 386
  • [38] INTERPRETATION OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS®) BY RHEUMATOLOGISTS
    Nagaraja, V.
    Fox, D. A.
    Francis, S.
    Khanna, P.
    Laing, T.
    Marks, R. M.
    Monrad, S. U.
    Ognenovski, V.
    Phillips, K.
    Singer, O.
    Khanna, D.
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2014, 73 : 627 - 627
  • [39] Patient interpretations vary for PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) upper extremity questions
    Long, Chao
    Beres, Laura
    Wu, Albert
    Giladi, Aviram
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2021, 30 (SUPPL 1) : S90 - S90
  • [40] USE OF THE PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROMIS) IN RARE DISEASE CLINICAL TRIALS
    Poritz, J.
    Wiltshire, L.
    Hubscher, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (12) : S429 - S429