The December 2020 magnitude (Mw) 6.4 Petrinja earthquake, Croatia: seismological aspects, emergency response and impacts

被引:8
|
作者
Atalic, Josip [1 ]
Demsic, Marija [1 ]
Banicek, Maja [2 ]
Uros, Mario [1 ]
Dasovic, Iva [3 ]
Prevolnik, Snjezan [3 ]
Kadic, Alen [2 ]
Novak, Marta Savor [1 ]
Nastev, Miroslav [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zagreb, Dept Engn Mech, Fac Civil Engn, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] Univ Zagreb, Croatian Ctr Earthquake Engn, Fac Civil Engn, Zagreb, Croatia
[3] Univ Zagreb, Dept Geophys, Fac Sci, Zagreb, Croatia
[4] Geol Survey Canada, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
关键词
Physical damage; Masonry buildings; Emergency response; Post-earthquake survey; Social impacts; SEISMICITY; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1007/s10518-023-01758-z
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
On December 29, 2020, nine months after the March Mw 5.4 Zagreb earthquake and amidst the COVID-19 lockdown, a devastating Mw 6.4 earthquake struck near the town of Petrinja, about 50 km SE from the country's capital Zagreb. It was preceded by the Mw 4.9 foreshock from the day before. The main shock claimed 7 fatalities and caused widespread damage. Historical centers of nearby cities with invaluable heritage buildings were significantly affected as were the many residential buildings, built mainly of unreinforced masonry. Damage was observed as far as 60 km from the epicenter. This paper summarizes the seismological aspects of the Mw 6.4 Petrinja earthquake, the emergency response and the main impacts to people and buildings. The description and findings are based on the field observations and a series of post-earthquake activities led by the team of the Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Zagreb. Typical damage to buildings and usability data are presented with examples based on 50,000 inspection results. By far the most affected were the unreinforced masonry buildings, followed by confined masonry, whereas reinforced concrete buildings were the least affected. The total direct and indirect losses are estimated to 4.8 billion EUR. The provided information represents a useful basis and impetus for improving emergency action and long-term disaster reduction plans in other regions with similar building exposure and seismotectonic settings.
引用
收藏
页码:5767 / 5808
页数:42
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Combined Geodetic and Seismological Study of the December 2020 Mw=4.6 Thiva (Central Greece) Shallow Earthquake
    Elias, Panagiotis
    Spingos, Ioannis
    Kaviris, George
    Karavias, Andreas
    Gatsios, Theodoros
    Sakkas, Vassilis
    Parcharidis, Issaak
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (13):
  • [22] Geotechnical Impacts of the January 7, 2020, Mw 6.4 Puerto Rico Earthquake and Associated Seismic Sequence
    Morales-Velez, Alesandra C.
    Hughes, K. Stephen
    GEO-EXTREME 2021: CASE HISTORIES AND BEST PRACTICES, 2021, 328 : 471 - 483
  • [23] Orientation and intensity of maximum response spectral ordinates during the December 20, 2022 Mw 6.4 Ferndale, California earthquake
    Girmay, Nathan
    Miranda, Eduardo
    Poulos, Alan
    SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 176
  • [24] Seismic Response of a Typical Shear-Wall Dominated High-Rise Condominium Building during the January 7, 2020, Mw6.4 Indios, Puerto Rico Earthquake
    Celebi, Mehmet
    Miranda, Eduardo
    Martinez-Cruzado, Jose A.
    JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 147 (12)
  • [25] Emergency response, intervention, and societal recovery in Greece and Turkey after the 30th October 2020, MW=7.0, Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake
    Mavroulis, S.
    Ilgac, M.
    Tunca, M.
    Lekkas, E.
    Puskulcu, S.
    Kourou, A.
    Sextos, A.
    Mavrouli, M.
    Can, G.
    Thoma, T.
    Manousaki, M.
    Karveleas, N.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 20 (14) : 7933 - 7955
  • [26] Emergency response, intervention, and societal recovery in Greece and Turkey after the 30th October 2020, MW = 7.0, Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake
    S. Mavroulis
    M. Ilgac
    M. Tunçağ
    E. Lekkas
    S. Püskülcü
    A. Kourou
    A. Sextos
    M. Mavrouli
    G. Can
    T. Thoma
    M. Manousaki
    N. Karveleas
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2022, 20 : 7933 - 7955