From Exclusion to Glass Ceiling: A History of Women in Neonatal Medicine

被引:3
|
作者
Obladen, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Dept Neonatol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Gender pay gap; Glass ceiling; History; Sticky floor; Women in neonatology; Female career; Gender equity; ACADEMIC MEDICINE; NEWBORN; ADVANCEMENT; PHYSICIANS; INFANTS;
D O I
10.1159/000530311
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The 21st century's medicine is predominantly female: two thirds of medical students now are women. In 375 BCE, Plato argued for equal education for male and female professions, explicitly physicians. In Greece and Rome, tombstones testify for patients' gratitude to women physicians. Christianization opened an era of female subordination. When universities established faculties of medicine during the 13th century, women were excluded and had no place where they could study medicine. Since 1850, female medical studies have been debated. Zurich admitted women from 1864, Paris from 1866. Up until the 1920s, treatment of newborns - especially preterm infants - was in the domain of obstetricians. When pediatricians accepted responsibility for sick newborns, women founded hospitals and public health facilities for infants. After WW2, women took leading roles in research. Their share within pediatrics increased from below 10% to above 60%. But they achieved less than 20% of full professor or chair positions in Europe and less than 35% in the US. Female neonatologists reached fewer positions in editorial boards, authorships, h-factors, keynote lectures, and research grants than did male colleagues. Women pediatricians earned 24% less than did male colleagues. When adjusted for labor force characteristics, the pay gap was still 13%. Women can augment their career chances by setting targets, seeking mentorship, and strengthening self-confidence. Women's careers should be effectively accelerated by institutional support: research offers, part-time work, paid research time, maternity/paternity leave, and support for childcare. Research-oriented neonatology cannot afford to lose female talents.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 389
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Is There Still a Glass Ceiling for Women in Academic Surgery?
    Ying Zhuge
    Kaufman, Joyce
    Simeone, Diane M.
    Chen, Herbert
    Velazquez, Omaida C.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 253 (04) : 637 - 643
  • [32] Women Rule: Shattering the Executive Glass Ceiling
    Jalalzai, Farida
    POLITICS & GENDER, 2008, 4 (02) : 205 - 231
  • [33] The glass ceiling of women researchers: the incomplete science
    Sales Gutierrez, Laura
    ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2009, 19 (01): : 1 - 3
  • [34] Women blocked by glass ceiling still contribute
    Miller, M
    WORKFORCE, 1997, 76 (01): : 22 - 23
  • [35] Executive women Brazilian: Glass ceiling in question
    Mota Santos, Carolina Maria
    Tanure, Betania
    de Carvalho Neto, Antonio Moreira
    REVISTA ADMINISTRACAO EM DIALOGO, 2014, 16 (03): : 56 - 75
  • [36] Spanish Women Hepatologists: Breaking The Glass Ceiling?
    Giner, Remedios
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2018, 113 (04): : 622 - 623
  • [37] Women entrepreneurs: Moving beyond the glass ceiling
    Naughton, TJ
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 1998, 19 (04) : 429 - 430
  • [38] Spanish Women Hepatologists: Breaking The Glass Ceiling?
    Serrano, Trinidad
    HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 66 : 407A - 407A
  • [39] The glass ceiling: a perspective of women working in Durban
    Kiaye, Risper Enid
    Singh, Anesh Maniraj
    GENDER IN MANAGEMENT, 2013, 28 (01): : 28 - 42
  • [40] WOMEN AS LEADERS IN PSYCHIATRY: GLASS CEILING OR MYTH?
    Tomar, A.
    Loi, S.
    Galbally, M.
    Golding, P.
    Quadrio, C.
    Kulkarni, J.
    Elzahaby, N.
    Kinder, S.
    Adams, S.
    Vine, R.
    Moore, E.
    Mackersey, S.
    Silberberg, C.
    Arunogiri, S.
    Kotze, B.
    Brahmbhat, P.
    Jenkins, K.
    Cockram, A.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 56 (1_SUPPL): : 81 - 81