Is preoperative hypoalbuminemia or hypoproteinemia a reliable marker for anastomotic leakage risk in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program?

被引:1
|
作者
Choi, Joseph Do Woong [1 ,2 ]
Kwik, Charlotte [1 ]
Vivekanandamoorthy, Nurojan [1 ]
Shanmugalingam, Aswin [1 ]
Allan, Lachlan [1 ]
Gavegan, Fiona [1 ]
Shedden, Karen [1 ]
Peters, Ashleigh [1 ]
Khoury, Toufic El [1 ,3 ]
Pathmanathan, Nimalan [1 ,2 ]
Toh, James Wei Tatt [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Westmead Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Corner Hawkesbury Rd & Darcy Rd, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Sch Med, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
Anastomotic leak; Hypoalbuminemia; Hypoproteinemia; Immunonutrition; MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS; SERUM-ALBUMIN; RESECTION; CANCER; IMMUNONUTRITION; METAANALYSIS; COLON;
D O I
10.1007/s00384-023-04450-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
PurposePreoperative hypoalbuminemia has traditionally been used as a marker of nutritional status and is considered a significant risk factor for anastomotic leak (AL).MethodsThe Westmead Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (WERAS) prospectively collected database, consisting of 361 patients who underwent colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis, was interrogated. Preoperative serum albumin and protein levels (measured within 1 week of surgery) were plotted on receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) and statistically analyzed for cutoff values, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV).ResultsThe incidence of AL was 4.4% (16/361). Overall mortality was 1.4% (5/361), 6.3% (1/16) in the AL group, and 1.2% (4/345) in the no AL group. The median preoperative albumin and protein level in the AL group were 39 g/L and 75 g/L, respectively. The median preoperative albumin and protein level in the no AL group were 38 g/L and 74 g/L, respectively. The Mann-Whitney U test showed no statistically significant difference in albumin levels (p = 0.4457) nor protein levels (p = 0.6245) in the AL and no AL groups. ROC curves demonstrated that preoperative albumin and protein levels were not good predictors of anastomotic leak. Cutoff values for albumin (38 g/L) and protein (75 g/L) both had poor PPV for AL (4.8% and 3.8% respectively).ConclusionIn patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery as part of an ERAS program, preoperative serum albumin and protein levels are not reliable in predicting AL. This may be because of nutritional supplementation provided as part of an ERAS program may correct nutritional deficits to protect against AL or that low albumin/protein is not as robust a marker of AL as previously reported.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is preoperative hypoalbuminemia or hypoproteinemia a reliable marker for anastomotic leakage risk in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program?
    Joseph Do Woong Choi
    Charlotte Kwik
    Nurojan Vivekanandamoorthy
    Aswin Shanmugalingam
    Lachlan Allan
    Fiona Gavegan
    Karen Shedden
    Ashleigh Peters
    Toufic El Khoury
    Nimalan Pathmanathan
    James Wei Tatt Toh
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [2] Association of perioperative immunonutrition with anastomotic leak among patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery within a robust enhanced recovery after surgery program
    Younan, Samuel A.
    Ali, Danish
    Hawkins, Alexander T.
    Bradley III, Joel F. Bradley
    Hopkins, M. Benjamin
    Geiger, Timothy
    Jayaram, Jennifer
    Khan, Aimal
    SURGERY, 2025, 181
  • [3] Cost Saving Analysis of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Program for Elective Colorectal Surgery in an ERAS Qualified and Training Center
    Bertocchi, Elisa
    Brunelli, Davide
    Squaranti, Thomas
    Campagnola, Diego
    Camparsi, Sara
    Tessari, Roberto
    Menestrina, Nicola
    Gentile, Irene
    Sanfilippo, Lorenza
    De Santis, Nicoletta
    Guerriero, Massimo
    Ruffo, Giacomo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025,
  • [4] OUTCOMES OF OBESE PATIENTS UNDERGOING GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY ON AN ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROGRAM
    Harrison, R.
    Iniesta, M. D.
    Cain, K.
    Siverand, A.
    Pitcher, B.
    Lasala, J.
    Ramirez, P. T.
    Meyer, L. A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2019, 29 : A154 - A154
  • [5] Audit of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Guideline Adherence in Elective Colorectal Surgery
    Mehl, Lyons L.
    Waldron, R.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2016, 185 : S206 - S206
  • [6] Future direction of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program in colorectal surgery
    Park, In Ja
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2022, 38 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [7] The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a metaanalysis of randomised controlled trials
    Varadhan, Krishna K.
    Neal, Keith R.
    Dejong, Cornelius. H. C.
    Fearon, Kenneth. C. H.
    Ljungqvist, Olle
    Lobo, Dileep N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 : 35 - 36
  • [8] Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Improving Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Major Colorectal Surgery
    Turaga, Anjani H.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [9] THE IMPACT OF A PREHABILITATION AND ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROGRAM ON PATIENTS UNDERGOING SURGERY FOR ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
    Teixeira, Natalia
    Farres Rubi, Alba
    Soler Moreno, Cristina
    Munoz Sanchez, Raquel
    Gine Servent, Marta
    Paniagua Iglesias, Pilar
    Rovira Negre, Ramon
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2023, 33 : A156 - A157
  • [10] Audit of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol in Elective Colorectal Surgery (A Loop Audit)
    Akhtar, M. A. B.
    Zeeshan, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110