The 3 Tiers Multiple-Choice Diagnostic Test for Primary Students' Science Misconception

被引:0
|
作者
Laeli, Cos Ma'arif Hidayatul [1 ]
Gunarhadi [1 ]
Muzzazinah [1 ]
机构
[1] Sebelas Maret Univ, 0271-646994,Ir Sutami 36 Kentingan St, Surakarta, Central Java, Indonesia
来源
PEGEM EGITIM VE OGRETIM DERGISI | 2023年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
misconception; primary student; science; 3 Tier Multiple-choice diagnostic tests; 3-TIER TEST;
D O I
10.47750/pegegog.13.02.13
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The goal of this study was to determine how the 3 Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test developed in primary students' scientific understanding. This research and development includes fundamental studies, model development, and model testing. 161 fourth-graders served as research subjects. Tests, surveys, and observations are all used to collect data. The Miles and Huberman interactive model was used to analyze qualitative data, and the paired sample t-test and N-Gain Score test were used to analyze quantitative data. The findings indicate that 3 Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test instrument has a V index of 0,80 and a Cronbach's Alpha value of 0,890, indicating that the instrument is valid. Thus, all test items are legitimate and dependable. The instrument was able to identify misconceptions regarding science learning in light material that fit the following profile based on the results of the trials: 28,7% of students do not grasp the idea of light sources; 43,3% have misunderstandings; 17,8% have incomplete comprehension with misconceptions; 20,2% have incomplete understanding without misconceptions; and 14,9% have complete understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 111
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] TEST-WISENESS STRATEGIES THAT STUDENTS USE TO ANSWER MULTIPLE-CHOICE CHEMISTRY EXAMS
    HAMBY, ML
    ROBINSON, WR
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 200 : 86 - CHED
  • [42] Development and application of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic test for high school students' understanding of cell division and reproduction
    Sesli, Ertugrul
    Kara, Yilmaz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION, 2012, 46 (04) : 214 - 225
  • [43] The test taker's fallacy: How students guess answers on multiple-choice tests
    Lee, Chan Jean
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING, 2019, 32 (02) : 140 - 151
  • [44] Nested diagnostic classification models for multiple-choice items
    Liu, Ren
    Liu, Haiyan
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 74 (02): : 257 - 285
  • [45] Intelligent diagnostic feedback for online multiple-choice questions
    Guo, R.
    Palmer-Brown, D.
    Lee, S. W.
    Cai, F. F.
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2014, 42 (03) : 369 - 383
  • [46] Intelligent diagnostic feedback for online multiple-choice questions
    R. Guo
    D. Palmer-Brown
    S. W. Lee
    F. F. Cai
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2014, 42 : 369 - 383
  • [47] Incorporation and evaluation of science practices in multiple-choice items
    Reed, Jessica
    Holme, Thomas
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 249
  • [48] An Investigation of Explanation Multiple-Choice Items in Science Assessment
    Liu, Ou Lydia
    Lee, Hee-Sun
    Linn, Marcia C.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2011, 16 (03) : 164 - 184
  • [49] STUDENTS DECISION-MAKING IN MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTS
    GALLOFRE, A
    FEYTMANS, E
    SWANECK, J
    [J]. REVISTA MEDICA DE CHILE, 1973, 101 (11) : 895 - 901
  • [50] STUDENTS EXPERIENCES IN STUDYING FOR MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTION EXAMINATIONS
    SCOULLER, KM
    PROSSER, M
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1994, 19 (03) : 267 - 279