Risk Factors for Treatment Failure in Patients Who Have Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection Treated With Two-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty as Well as Their Fate

被引:6
|
作者
Chen, Yi-Chen [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Yu-Chih [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Chang, Chih-Hsiang [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Lee, Sheng-Hsun [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Chang, Yuhan [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Educ, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Bone & Joint Res Ctr, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 5,Fuxing St, Taoyuan, Taiwan
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2023年 / 38卷 / 02期
关键词
knee periprosthetic joint infection; 2-stage exchange arthroplasty; recurrent infection; prognosis; risk factor; REVISION; ANTIBIOTICS; DEBRIDEMENT; RETENTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.033
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is considered the gold standard treatment for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, there is a scarcity of research investigating the major risk factors for infection recurrence and the prognosis after infection recurrence.Methods: This study included 203 patients who underwent 2-stage exchange arthroplasty between June 22, 2010 and January 24, 2017. The need of reoperation for infection-related or PJI-related mortality was considered treatment failure. Participant age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, culture results, length of hospital stay, cause of treatment failure, operative procedure, and fate were analyzed.Results: Fifty-three patients experienced treatment failure (26.1%). Mean follow-up was 63 months (range, 26-103). Based on the multivariate analyses, risk factors for treatment failure included men and positive intraoperative culture during reimplantation. Recurrent infection was most commonly caused by Staphylococcus aureus (32.1%, 17/53), and new microorganisms caused recurrent infection in 34 of 53 (64.2%) patients. In 44 patients who had treatment failure, debridement, antibiotic therapy, irrigation, and retention of prosthesis (DAIR) performed within 6 months of reimplantation and at <3 weeks from symptom onset resulted in a significantly higher success rate than the use of other DAIR protocols (P 1/4 .031). Conclusion: Men and positive intraoperative culture are major risk factors for 2-stage exchange arthroplasty failure in patients who have knee PJI. Recurrent infection in these patients is usually caused by new microorganisms. DAIR within 6 months of reimplantation and at <3 weeks from symptom onset results in good outcomes in these patients.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The treatment of periprosthetic joint infection: safety and efficacy of two stage versus one stage exchange arthroplasty
    Palmer, Joseph R.
    Pannu, Tejbir S.
    Villa, Jesus M.
    Manrique, Jorge
    Riesgo, Aldo M.
    Higuera, Carlos A.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2020, 17 (03) : 245 - 252
  • [42] Plasma D-dimer Does Not Anticipate the Fate of Reimplantation in Two-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Preliminary Investigation
    Pannu, Tejbir S.
    Villa, Jesus M.
    Engh, Charles, III
    Patel, Arpan
    Levine, Brett R.
    Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
    Higuera, Carlos A.
    Riesgo, Aldo M.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 479 (07) : 1458 - 1468
  • [43] Restoration of the hip geometry after two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection
    Jan Hubert
    Frank Timo Beil
    Tim Rolvien
    Christian Ries
    Stephan Frosch
    Dominik Saul
    Thelonius Hawellek
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [44] Restoration of the hip geometry after two-stage exchange with intermediate resection arthroplasty for periprosthetic joint infection
    Hubert, Jan
    Beil, Frank Timo
    Rolvien, Tim
    Ries, Christian
    Frosch, Stephan
    Saul, Dominik
    Hawellek, Thelonius
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [45] Risk Factors and Treatment Options for Failure of a Two-Stage Exchange
    Fagotti L.
    Tatka J.
    Salles M.J.C.
    Queiroz M.C.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2018, 11 (3) : 420 - 427
  • [46] Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty
    Kubista, Bernd
    Hartzler, Robert U.
    Wood, Christina M.
    Osmon, Douglas R.
    Hanssen, Arlen D.
    Lewallen, David G.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 36 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [47] Reinfection after two-stage revision for periprosthetic infection of total knee arthroplasty
    Bernd Kubista
    Robert U. Hartzler
    Christina M. Wood
    Douglas R. Osmon
    Arlen D. Hanssen
    David G. Lewallen
    International Orthopaedics, 2012, 36 : 65 - 71
  • [48] Periprosthetic Infection Recurrence After 2-Stage Exchange Arthroplasty: Failure or Fate?
    Triantafyllopoulos, Georgios K.
    Memtsoudis, Stavros G.
    Zhang, Wei
    Ma, Yan
    Sculco, Thomas P.
    Poultsides, Lazaros A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (02): : 526 - 531
  • [49] Factors affecting range of motion following two-stage revision arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic knee infection
    Kim, Doo-Yeol
    Seo, Young-Chae
    Kim, Chang-Wan
    Lee, Chang-Rack
    Jung, Soo-Hwan
    KNEE SURGERY & RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (01)
  • [50] Factors affecting range of motion following two-stage revision arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic knee infection
    Doo-Yeol Kim
    Young-Chae Seo
    Chang-Wan Kim
    Chang-Rack Lee
    Soo-Hwan Jung
    Knee Surgery & Related Research, 34