Prediction of water quality extremes with composite quantile regression neural network

被引:6
|
作者
Nguyen, Khanh Thi Nhu [1 ]
Francois, Baptiste [1 ]
Balasubramanian, Hari [2 ]
Dufour, Alexis [3 ]
Brown, Casey [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 130 Nat Resources Rd, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Univ Massachusetts Amherst, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, 160 Governors Dr, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[3] Climate Risk & Resilience, WSP, 1600 Blvd Rene Levesque West 11th Floor, Montreal, PQ H3H 1P9, Canada
关键词
Composite quantile regression neural network; Machine learning; Water quality; Water supply system; ORGANIC-CARBON; CLIMATE-CHANGE; PROBABILISTIC ESTIMATION; TURBIDITY PREDICTION; MODEL; HYDROLOGY; VARIABLES; SEDIMENT; EVENTS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-022-10870-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water quality extremes, which water quality models often struggle to predict, are a grave concern to water supply facilities. Most existing water quality models use mean error functions to maximize the predictability of water quality mean value. This paper describes a composite quantile regression neural network (CQRNN) model, which simultaneously estimates non-crossing regression quantiles by minimizing the composite quantile regression error function. This method can improve the prediction of extremes. This paper evaluates the performance of CQRNN for predicting extreme values of turbidity and total organic carbon (TOC) and compares with quantile regression (QR), linear regression (LR), and k-nearest neighbors (KNN) in an application to the Hetch Hetchy Regional Water System, which is the primary water supply for San Francisco, CA. CQRNN is superior to QR, LR, and KNN for predicting the mean trend and extremes of turbidity and TOC, especially for the non-Gaussian turbidity data. The performance of CQRNN is the most stable relative to other methods over different training sample sizes.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantile Regression Neural Network for Forecasting Inflow and Outflow in Yogyakarta
    Amalia, Farah Fajrina
    Suhartono
    Rahayu, Santi Puteri
    Suhermi, Novri
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STATISTICS, MATHEMATICS, TEACHING, AND RESEARCH 2017, 2018, 1028
  • [22] An Improved Quantile Regression Neural Network for Probabilistic Load Forecasting
    Zhang, Wenjie
    Quan, Hao
    Srinivasan, Dipti
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2019, 10 (04) : 4425 - 4434
  • [23] Modelling systemic risk using neural network quantile regression
    Georg Keilbar
    Weining Wang
    Empirical Economics, 2022, 62 : 93 - 118
  • [24] Robust prediction of network traffic using quantile regression models
    Wu, Wei Biao
    Xu, Zhiwei
    Wang, Yu
    IRI 2006: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION, 2006, : 220 - +
  • [25] Prediction of water quality indices by regression analysis and artificial neural networks
    Rene, E. R.
    Saidutta, M. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2008, 2 (02) : 183 - 188
  • [26] An Artificial Neural Network Model for Water Quality and Water Consumption Prediction
    Rustam, Furqan
    Ishaq, Abid
    Kokab, Sayyida Tabinda
    de la Torre Diez, Isabel
    Vidal Mazon, Juan Luis
    Lili Rodriguez, Carmen
    Ashraf, Imran
    WATER, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [27] Bayesian time-varying quantile regression to extremes
    Do Nascimento, Fernando Ferraz
    Bourguignon, Marcelo
    ENVIRONMETRICS, 2020, 31 (02)
  • [28] Spatial distribution of water quality based on generalized regression neural network
    Wang, Huibin
    Xu, Lizhong
    Sun, Shaohua
    Yang, Simon X.
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION ACQUISITION, VOLS 1 AND 2, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 1086 - 1090
  • [29] Bayesian composite quantile regression
    Huang, Hanwen
    Chen, Zhongxue
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL COMPUTATION AND SIMULATION, 2015, 85 (18) : 3744 - 3754
  • [30] ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK AND REGRESSION TECHNIQUES IN MODELLING SURFACE WATER QUALITY
    Merdun, Hasan
    Cinar, Oezer
    ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ENGINEERING, 2010, 36 (02): : 95 - 109